Skip to content

We Went, We Saw, We Got Chased Out…

Alemayehu G. Mariam

Following the Battle of Zela in 47 B.C. (present day Zile, Turkey), Julius Caesar claimed victory by declaring: “I came; I saw; I conquered.” In 2011, Caesar Meles Zenawi, the dictator-in-chief in Ethiopia, scattered his top henchmen throughout the U.S. and Europe to declare victory in the propaganda war on Diaspora Ethiopians. But there was no victory to be had, only {www:ignominious} defeat at the hands of Zenawi’s {www:tenacious}, resolute and dogged opponents. No victory dances; only a speedy shuffle back to the capo di tutti capi (boss of all bosses) to deliver the message: “We went; We saw; We got chased the hell out of Dodge!”

The purpose of the recent official travelling circus was to introduce and generate support among Diaspora Ethiopians for Zenawi’s five-year economic program pretentiously labeled “Growth and Transformation Plan”. In city after city in North America and Europe, Zenawi’s crew received defiant and pugnacious reception. Ethiopians made the various meeting venues and sites virtual mini-Tahrir Squares (Egypt). Ethiopian men and women, Christians and Muslims, young and old, professionals and service workers, students and teachers and members of various political groups and parties showed up in a united front to confront and challenge Zenawi’s henchmen. One need only view any one of the numerous videotapes online to appreciate the intensity, depth and strength of Diaspora Ethiopian opposition to Zenawi’s regime.

In Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Atlanta, Dallas, Seattle, New York, Toronto, London and various other cities, Ethiopians came out in full force and tried to gain admission into the meetings.  Many were singled out and turned back. In a widely-disseminated and cogently argued “open letter”,Fekade Shewakena, a former professor at Addis Ababa University, wrote Girma Birru, Zenawi’s official representative in the U.S., complaining about his discriminatory treatment in being refused admission at the meeting held on the campus of Howard University:

I was formally invited by an [Ethiopian] embassy staffer… I faced the wrath of the protestors as I was crossing their picket lines [to attend the meeting]. Then I met the people who were deployed by the [Ethiopian] embassy to man the gate, and do the sad job of screening participants and deciding what type of Ethiopian should be let in and what type should be kept out. I was told I was ineligible to enter and saw many people being returned from entering. One screener told me… “ante Tigre titela yelem ende min litisera metah” [Tr. Do you not hate Tigreans? What business do you have here?…]

The ethnic stripe test was the last straw for many of the protesters who denounced Zenawi and his crew as “murderers”, “thieves” (leba) and “opportunists” (hodams). Inside the meeting halls, those who asked tough questions were singled out and ejected by the organizers, often violently. Some were physically assaulted requiring emergency medical assistance. Nearly all of the meetings were disrupted, cancelled, stopped or delayed. To sum it up, those who made peaceful dialogue impossible, made angry verbal exchanges inevitable.

Zenawi in September, His Troops in April?

It will be recalled that in September 2010 when Zenawi came to the U.S. to speak at the World Leader’s Conference at Columbia University, he set off a firestorm of opposition among Ethiopians in the U.S. Busloads of Ethiopian activists descended on New York City to confront Zenawi, but they were kept away from the campus. A massive campaign (reminiscent of the anti-war protest days at Columbia in the late 1960s) was undertaken to mobilize Columbia students, faculty and staff to put pressure on the university administration to disinvite Zenawi.

Zenawi’s invitation also provoked strong reaction among non-Ethiopians. Prof. Ted Vestal, the distinguished and respected scholar on Ethiopia, outraged by Zenawi’s invitation wrote Columbia President Lee Bollinger: “The only way you can redeem the damaged reputation of the World Leaders Forum is by publicly making known the shortcomings of Prime Minister Meles and his government in your introductory remarks–a refutation similar to what you did in introducing President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran in 2007.”

World-renowned Columbia economist Prof. Jagdish Bagwati wrote in disgust: “It seems probable that the President’s [Bollinger] office was merely reproducing uncritically the rubbish that was supplied by one of these Columbia entrepreneurs [Columbia Professors Joseph Stiglitz (Zenawi’s sponsor) and  Jeffrey Sachs] whose objective is to ingratiate himself with influential African leaders regardless of their democratic and human-rights record, to get PR and ‘goodies’ for themselves at African summits, at the UN where these leaders have a vote, etc.”

I vigorously defended Zenawi’s right to speak at Columbia because I believed the opportunity could offer him a teachable moment in the ways of free people:

I realize that this may not be a popular view to hold, but I am reminded of the painful truth in Prof. Noam Chomsky’s admonition: ‘If we don’t believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don’t believe in it at all.’ On a personal level, it would be hypocritical of me to argue for free speech and press freedoms in Ethiopia and justify censorship or muzzling of Zenawi stateside. If censorship is bad for the good citizens of Ethiopia, it is also bad for the dictators of Ethiopia.

Following the Columbia episode, one has to wonder why Zenawi would send hordes of his top officials to the U.S. and elsewhere to evangelize on behalf of his regime. It is logical to assume that Zenawi conducted a “vulnerability analysis” of Diaspora Ethiopians before sending out his crew. It is likely that he studied Diaspora attitudes and perceptions toward his regime and the current situation in the country, the ethnic and political divisions and tensions in the Diaspora, the strength of Diaspora elite cooperation and intensity of conflict among them, etc. and decided to make his move. He likely concluded that any potential opposition to the meetings could be handled by utilizing an “ethnic filter” at the door of the meeting halls.

But what are Zenawi’s real reasons for sending his top cadre of officials to North America and Europe? There could be several answers to this deceptively simple question.

Zenawi’s Arsenal of Weapons of Mass Distraction

Careful evaluation of Zenawi’s propaganda strategy shows that the dispatch of officials to the to the U.S. and Europe is part of a broader integrated campaign to undermine opposition in the Diaspora, energize supporters and reinforce favorable perception and action by  foreign donors and banks. Manifestly, the mission of the crew sent to “dialogue” with the Ethiopian Diaspora was to divert attention from the extreme domestic economic, political and social problems in the country and to exude public confidence in the fact that the upheavals in North Africa are of no consequence in Ethiopia. The other elements in this propaganda campaign of mass distraction include belligerent talk of regime change in Eritrea, {www:inflammatory} water war-talk with Egypt, wild allegations of terrorist attacks, wholesale jailing and intimidation of opponents, proposals for the construction of an imaginary dam, attacks on international human rights organizations that have published critical reports on the regime (just a day ago, Zenawi’s deputy said he “dismisses” the 2010 U.S. Human Rights Report as “baseless”) and so on.  The hope is that the more Diasporans talk about the manufactured issues, the less they will talk about the real issues of stratospheric inflation, food shortages, skyrocketing fuel costs, massive repression, information and media suppression, etc. in Ethiopia.

By alternating propaganda topics from day today, Zenawi hopes to keep his opponents and critics talking reflexively about his issues and off-balance. The more outrageous his claims, the more reaction he is likely to elicit from his opponents and critics, and be able to better control the debate and the minds of those engaged in it. To be sure, by sending his travelling circus to the U.S., Zenawi has succeeded in angering, inflaming and riling up his Diaspora opponents. He knows just how to “get their goat”. He manipulates that outpouring of anger, rage and frustration to keep his opponents’ eyes off the prize.

The Propaganda Value of “In-Yo’-Diaspora-Face” Confrontation

By sending a large delegation into the Ethiopian Diaspora, Zenawi is also sending an unmistakable message: “In yo’ face, Ethiopian Diaspora! I can do what I am doing in Ethiopia just as easily in your neck of the woods.” It is a confrontational propaganda strategy tinged with a tad of arrogance. Zenawi seems to believe that the Ethiopian Diaspora is so divided against itself and inherently dysfunctional that it is incapable of mounting an effective opposition to his regime or even his crew’s visit. By unleashing swarms of regime officials in the Diaspora, Zenawi likely intended to further degrade the Diaspora’s ability to conduct or sustain opposition activities, {www:demoralize} and disconcert them and confuse their leadership. On the other hand, if he can muster a successful foray with his crew, he could establish his invincibility and spread pessimism and despair in the Diaspora. But the whole affair proved to be a total failure as have all previous efforts to stage “in yo’ face” confrontation with Diaspora Ethiopians. The Diaspora may be divided but not when it comes to Zenawi’s regime.

Effective Propaganda Tool Against the “Extreme Diaspora”

The other less apparent side of “in yo’ face” confrontation is to make a record of the “extreme Diaspora”. Zenawi will no doubt use this episode to show American and European  policy makers that he is reasonable and statesman-like while the opposition, particularly in the Diaspora, consist of an assortment of wild-eyed, hysterical, fanatical, intolerant, irrational, hateful and mean-spirited extremists. He will argue to American policy makers that he sent his top leaders to engage Diasporan Ethiopians in civil dialogue only to be attacked, insulted and berated. He will hand them copies of  well-edited videotapes of agitated protesters titled: “Behold the Ethiopian Diaspora!” In short, Zenawi will use the protest videos as Exhibit A to demonize, discredit, dehumanize, marginalize, categorize and sermonize about the Evil Extreme Ethiopian Diaspora. At the end, he will offer American policy makers a simple choice: “I am your man! It’s me or these raving lunatics.” Based on historical experience and empirical observations, some American policy makers may actually buy his argument.

Pandering to the U.S., IMF, E.U.

A third objective of the dog and pony show about the “Growth and Transformational Plan” is to please (hoodwink) the U.S., the International Monetary Fund, the European Union and others. It is an elaborately staged drama for this audience to show that Zenawi has a real economic plan for Ethiopia that exceeds the “Millennium Goals” (e.g. eradicate extreme poverty, reduce child mortality, fight AIDS, form global partnership, etc. by 2015). By making gestures of engagement with the Ethiopian Diaspora, Zenawi is trying to build credibility for his “economic plan” and that it has broad support within and outside the country. He deserves billions more in in loans and economic aid. Zenawi knows exactly what buttons to push to get the attention and approval of donors and loaners.

The “economic plan” itself floats on a sea of catchphrases, clichés, slogans, buzzwords, platitudes, truisms and bombast. Zenawi says his plan will produce “food sufficiency in five years.” But he cautions it is a “high-case scenario which is clearly very, very ambitious.” He says  the “base-case” scenario of “11 percent average economic growth over the next five years is  doable” and the “high-case” scenario of 14.9 percent is “not unimaginable”. The hype of super economic growth rate is manifestly detached from reality. The Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative Multidimensional Poverty Index 2010 (formerly annual U.N.D.P. Human Poverty Index) ranks Ethiopia as second poorest (ahead of famine-ravaged Mali) country on the planet. Six million Ethiopians needed emergency food aid last year and many millions will need food aid this year. An annual growth rate of 15 percent for the second poorest country on the planet for the next five years goes beyond the realm of imagination to pure fantasy. The IMF predicts a growth rate of 7 percent for 2011, but talking about economic statistics on Ethiopia is like talking about the art of voodoo.

Dialogue, Like Charity, Begins at Home

Like charity, dialogue begins at home. Zenawi should allow free and unfettered discussion of his economic plan as well as human rights record within Ethiopia first before sending his troupe into the Diaspora.  Conversation is a two-way street. If Zenawi wants to talk about his economic plan to Diaspora Ethiopians, he must be prepared to listen to their human rights concerns.

There is not a single Ethiopian who will oppose food sufficiency in that hungry country by 2015 or decline to contribute to the prosperity and development of Ethiopia. Reasonable people could disagree on Zenawi’s “growth and transformation plan”. History shows that similar schemes based on foreign agricultural investments in Latin America have produced Banana Republics. Whether Zenawi’s economic plan will produce a Barley or Rice Republic in Ethiopia is an arguable question. But there can be no development without freedom. There can be no development in a climate of fear, loathing and intimidation, and one-party, one-man domination. Most certainly, there can be no development without respect for fundamental human rights and the rule of law. Though it is very possible to pull the wool over the eyes of people who have very little access to information, it is impossible to fool a politically conscious, active and energized Ethiopian Diaspora community by putting on a dog and pony show.



9 thoughts on “We Went, We Saw, We Got Chased Out…

  1. “.. But there can be no development without freedom…”

    It is known that Dictatorships have the flexibility to establish the proper incentives to attract Foreign Direct Investment.

    As the Chinese example shows us using a strict GTP scheme moved 400 million Chinese from poverty to a middle class. In the last 10 years the average growth rate was 10 % a year.

    When a country like Ethiopia where there are tensions with Liberation Movements fighting to separate etc. the present dictatorship seems to be resolving these conflicts. I just saw a video of Meeting in Atlanta where OLF is clearly calling for all Ethiopian struggle. That was not the case in the past.

  2. As usual, an excellent piece. I only hope that Mr. Zenawi, who fools himself by thinking that he knows it all, will listen to his betters like Prof. Alemayehu and learn a thing or two about leadership.

    If we had democratic leaders like Prof. Al or Birtukan Mideksa, who make all Ethiopians feel like Ethiopians, we wouldn’t have opposition from the Diaspora; instead all of Diaspora members would unite with the home government for the development of their beloved country.

    But what we see now in Ethiopia is a regime which is alien to the citizens — and whose leader is afraid of the people he rules and would not even dare to venture out to go a restaurant or walk on Addis Ababa’s streets freely.

    What kind of life is Meles and his family are leading? You know, actually, in this regard, one can say most of the Ethiopian people are more free than Zenawi and his closest associates, for the latter always live in fear because of the crimes they committed against the people of Ethiopia.

  3. The people who were chanting ‘Thief’,’Thief’ and ‘Hodam’, ‘Hodam’ to the Ethiopian officials and to the attendees of the meeting are against democracy and human rights. If the guys who were bullying have any evidence about theft committed by the ethiopian officals, then they should follow the accepted legal procedures. Just calling names and disturbing meetings is the work of gangesters and mafias. The other point is that of being the advocate of democracy, democracy and development,development but working day and night to deny the poor ethiopian people the right to get foreign assistant because the leaders of the gangesters are not in power in Ethiopia. It is up to the individual to attend the meeting or not to attend the meeting or in other words to support the present government or to oppose the present government. This deadly idea of being the perfect, being the ultimate prophet to the Ethiopian people is an insult to the Ethiopian people. Being a professor in North America doesn’t entitle anyone to speak in behalf of the Ethiopian masses.

  4. Let’s not be trapped by Woyane poor tactics to divert the attention from main issue, uprising. They tried, if you see it carefully it was chronological, first they begun mass arrest in the name of “ being OLF member trained in Asmara” that couldn’t gave them necessary attention because arresting with false pretext is Woyane’s daily habit for the past 20 years, then jumped to war mongering which this one also habitual for them from their existence, this time again with Asmara it doesn’t get needed ears you can’t fool people twice, finally someone may be “ one of the genius Woyane” he the one may saw it in his dream or found in his pocket “Nile Dam project” which was not any where in the so called GTP, as mentioned in this article, to pull the wool over the eyes of people who have very little access to information.

    We gave them needed attention because they came to us to our doors we taught them a lesson even though they do not have ability or willing to learn from their failures for the past 20 years, let’s focus on the main issue, replacing dictatorial government with democratically elect by people.

    I also realized that some of us, members of Diaspora who are innocently thinking that the things back home is alright not because we believed deeply in the system, however due to the activities of the day to day life to make better future for our children here & in the process we luck information what is on the ground back home. The means of information is available but it is matter of time, some of us just turn on “Ethiopian TV” for the sake of NAFQOT we end up with Woyane misinformation propaganda.

    Those of us who happen to be getting little bit spare time than other to get access to unbiased information have to share with other in the form of discussion, email, face book, tweeter etc. to let them know what is the reality beyond Woyane cooked number of growth percentage.

    Thank you professor Al for you grate contribution, one day all Ethiopian will get access to unbiased information to find the truth, that day will not be far away if we work together beyond our deferences.

    God bless Ethiopia

  5. we all enjoy reading those so many articles written by many educated ethiopians, and almost all ethiopians agree the description of Meles.
    He along with his enabler are trying their best to destroy our country and this is clear to everyone even the goat herder. What we need here from our educated brothers and sisters is a leadership to guid us so the avrage person like me can contribute to help our people to be free from this khadi geverment. Please creat civic organization who can organiz us so we can come together and expose the wyane cadre who live in the democratic country but work so hard to help Meles kill our people and give our lad to whom ever he want.

  6. The truth is Meles Zenawi’s five-year economic program pretentiously labeled “Growth and Transformation Plan” is still going well and transforming Meles & Co. according to thier own satisfaction .
    When Meles Zenawi says Ethiopia’s growth he is refering to himself and the thugs around him personal economic growth . When we hear the world Ethiopia we have to interprate it upto whose mouth it came out of, to know exactly who/what they are refering to . When Meles Zenawi and his cadres say Ethiopia’s economy they are refering to Zenawi’s and his individual cadres private economic standard which is growing double digits or more while the rest of the people in Ethiopia are considered as some domestic animals which do not count for calculation in the Ethiopia’s growth and transformation . That is why many were not even allowed into the meetings because they were considered less human by the cadres .

  7. Critical reports like this shall be credited regardless of their contents and conclusion as it posetively contributes to our ambition of building truly democratic,strong and properious nation. However,it may be worthwhile to pose questions like . . . why did we failed to build human and democratic rights base as better as we wish?, what is needed and what we lack to prevail democracy in our country?, why did popular uprisings in countries like Egypt succeeded?,what is the relationship between education attainment and income level with democracy?…etc… Had we searched possible answers path for these questions,we would have at least managed to set clear future destiny of our country. In my oppinion, level of income and education attainment of citizens are important foundations that determine democratization of nation better than any other numerous factors. Thus,it may be possible to claim that these factors have positive relation with democracy. In support of this argument, sufficiantly large number of political economists believe the fact that there is minimum level of income to ensure democracy in a given country. The claim is not meerely theoretical, but could well be supported with empirical evidence. For instance, the recent successful Egyptian revolution was believed to be orchestrated and masterminded by middle income educated youth. This shows that better educated people with moderate access to income doesn’t tolerate suppression and tyranny. Unfortunately, our ambitious need for democracy is far below the reality of our country with respect to the above requirements. Finally,we arrive at ‘unhappy conclussion to some of us’ that the currently accelerating economic and social progress of our country will likely lay cornerstone for citizen friendly democratic system which accomodate our diversity.

Leave a Reply