By Jeffrey Gettleman
NAIROBI, Kenya: With the results from Kenya’s closely contested elections still up in the air and evidence growing of election mischief, riots erupted across the country on Saturday.
Columns of black smoke boiled up from the slums ringing Nairobi, the capital, as supporters of Raila Odinga, the leading presidential challenger, poured into the streets to protest what they said was a plot by the government to steal the vote.
The demonstrators clashed with police officers in riot gear and tore apart metal shanties with their bare hands. The scene replayed itself in Kisumu, Kakamega, Kajiado, Eldoret and other towns across Kenya, with several people killed.
Just 12 hours before, Odinga, a flamboyant politician and businessman, had been cruising to victory, according to preliminary results. He was leading Kenya’s president, Mwai Kibaki, by about one million votes in an election that was predicted to be the most fiercely fought in Kenya’s history and perhaps the greatest test yet of this young, multiparty democracy.
But that lead nearly vanished overnight. On Saturday morning, the gap had been cut to about 100,000 votes, with Odinga still ahead, but barely, with 47 percent of the vote compared with 46 percent for Kibaki. By Saturday night, with about 90 percent of the vote counted, Odinga’s lead had shrunk to a mere 38,000 votes.
But those results may not be valid. According to Kenya’s election commission, which is considered somewhat independent from the government, at least three areas from Kibaki’s stronghold of central Kenya reported suspiciously high numbers. In one area, Kibaki received 105,000 votes, even though there were only 70,000 registered voters. In another, the vote tally was changed, at the last minute, to give the president an extra 60,000 votes. In a third area, the turnout was reported at 98 percent.
Samuel Kivuitu, the chief of Kenya’s election commission, said his officers would investigate.
“We have powers to refuse results if they have obvious defects,” he said. He delayed announcing final results until Sunday.
Kibaki’s party denied it did anything wrong and said it had simply gained many votes from areas where the president is immensely popular.
But the sudden reversal immediately ignited suspicions, especially after results showed that many members of Parliament close to the president — including the vice president, the military minister, the foreign minister and more than 10 other cabinet members — were voted out of office in a wave of seeming dissatisfaction with the government.
Several foreign observers said they feared that the government was using its muscle to swing the election and stay in power, which could be a recipe for chaos, with the results rejected by millions of people and Kenya’s cherished stability in danger of collapsing.
Kenya is one of the most developed countries in Africa, but this election has exposed its ugly tribal underbelly.
Odinga is a Luo, a big tribe in Kenya that feels marginalized from the country’s Kikuyu elite that has dominated business and politics since independence in 1963. Kibaki is a Kikuyu, and the voting so far has split straight down tribal lines, with each candidate winning big in his tribal homeland.
On Saturday, the first signs of a tribal war flared up in Nairobi, with Luo gangs sweeping into a shantytown called Mathare and stoning several Kikuyu residents. In Kibera, another huge slum, supporters of Odinga burnt down kiosks that they said belonged to Kikuyu businessmen.
“No Raila, no Kenya!” they screamed, with the fires crackling behind them.
The streets were a collage of destruction, strewn with burning tires, broken bottles, fist-size rocks and fresh shell casings from soldiers who fired in the air to scare the demonstrators off. Some men sharpened machetes on the asphalt, vowing to shed blood should Odinga lose.
Kikuyus responded by forming packs of vigilantes to patrol their neighborhoods. As night fell, the gangs waited on corners, armed with machetes and lengths of wood.
Many Kenyans seemed distressed about what was happening. In Kibera, one man in a suit guided a young girl, her face a mask of panic, through the embers of burning tires.
“Unless they announce the winner soon,” said Lionel Joseph Ochieng, a Kibera resident, “this will only get worse.”
Election officials seemed to feel the clock ticking. They said they were trying to count the votes from Thursday’s election as quickly as possible but that they have been hampered by logistical problems and a record turnout, possibly upward of 70 percent.
Both political parties declared victory on Saturday, saying that by their calculations they had won the most votes. But by 1 p.m., the election commission had counted only 8 million votes out of a projected 10 to 11 million. The hush inside the heavily guarded election headquarters was a marked contrast to the raging street battles not far away.
The foreign diplomats who initially praised the election as being free and fair were beginning to change their tone.
Michael Ranneberger, the American ambassador to Kenya, rushed to the election headquarters at midnight on Friday because he said he had heard reports about vote rigging, though he declined to provide details. He urged voters to remain calm.
“This is a time for Kenyans to come together,” he said.
The head of the European Union’s election observer mission said that several election officials in the pro-Kibaki areas of central Kenya had initially kept their poll results secret, which is against Kenyan law.
“This is something we witnessed ourselves,” said Alexander Graf Lambsdorff, chief of the European delegation. “It’s clearly disturbing.”
The European Union is also investigating the high turnouts in the Kikuyu highlands north of Nairobi, where few have broken ranks with Kibaki’s party and some areas have voted nearly 100 percent in favor of the president.
The scenario that may be unfolding is the exact one that many foreign diplomats were dreading: a questionable razor-thin margin for the president, who had been trailing in just about every pre-election poll. It is not that Kibaki, 76, is so disliked himself. He has been in government since independence and is known as a courtly gentleman and economics whiz.
But he is seen by many Kenyans as continuing an unfair political system that has favored the Kikuyu at the expense of Kenya’s 30-plus other ethnic groups. Odinga, 62, boosted his popularity by tapping into those frustrations and building a coalition of many other tribes. His party has already demanded a recount in several districts and said it will not concede defeat if it loses.
6 thoughts on “Riots erupt across Kenya as rivals declare victory”
What do we learn from the voters of our neighbours?
how come we dont see kenyans shooting demonstrators?
goog magoog, I don’t think it makes any diference who wins this election for they may be competing on which one of them is the best slave to US interest?
during the pre-election around 200 kenyans were killed. but after the election, kenya will step up and become a positive example.
Just like Ethiopia’s 2005 election, this Kenyan election was already predetermined, actually the people who choose the winner are not the poor Kenyans but the real bosses at the US embassy in Nairobi. Most if not all African “multi party democracies” are not really democracies. That is a show for western neo-colonial cover, to make it seem a certain country is “democratic”.
What Africans need is not this sham western prescribed democracy but an indigenous home grown form of democracy that works for the benefit of its people. Look at Kenya, despite having been free since 1960, what have they accomplished besides some shiny buildings that serve western NGO’s, western companies and intelligence agencies. The rural and poor urban population is forgotten and still looking for handouts to survive on a day to day basis. It is about time Africans wised up, stop wasting their time immitating western “democracy” and start working to develop the majority of their population.
Our neighbors’ problem is our problem and their joy our joy.
Ethiopia and Kenya have been good friends since that great leader and liberator of Kenya – Jomo Kenyatta of Kikuyu tribe. Ethiopia demonstrated its friendship to Kenya by helping the Mau Mau independence movement against the British rule and by giving a helping hand to Jomo Kenyatta’s family in crisis at that time. With such heartily felt kindness, Ethiopia has cemented, perhaps, a lasting peace with its neighbor, Kenya. For such reason, the world should commend Ethiopia and Kenya for developing a peaceful coexistence between them and strengthening it without having any conflict between the two for such a long time. They may have some cattle thieves at their boarders on both sides but this problem has been always solved by discussion conducted by the elders of the two countries. Other than the cattle theft, there have been no other concrete major problems between the two lovely and peaceful neighbors.
Of course, for Ethiopia and Kenya tribalism has been a major disturbing issue within each country. When one tribe is in power, there is always a suspicion that the tribe in power is benefiting his own tribe, ignoring the other tribes. For example, the Amhara tribe in Ethiopia has been in power for a long time and has been blamed for neglecting the other tribes such as the Oromo tribe, the Tigre tribe, the Wollo tribe, and the others. In reality though, the Amhara tribe may have helped a handful of people from its own tribe; the rest of its tribe have remained as poor as the other tribes till this day. The vivid example how tribalism helps its own tribe, however, is the Meles Zenawi regime in Ethiopia. Meles is from the Tigre tribe and Mekelle is in Tigre, and since Meles has been in power, Mekelle, they say, has been the most prosperous town in the other Ethiopian towns.
We also hear that in Kenya the Kikuyu tribe has been in power since the founding father of the Kenyan nation – Jomo Kenyatta, himself a Kikuyu. In this case, it is fair to say that the other tribes such as the Masai, the Bantu, the Luo, and many others may have felt marginalized by the ruling party – the Kikuyu. One of the complaints we hear from one of the Kenyan tribes, especially from the Luo tribe in this Kenyan presidential election is that the Kikuyu government offers high paying jobs and big businesses to his own tribe at the cost of the other tribes. If this is the case, I think, it is time for the Kikuyu leader, Mr. Mwai Kbaki, who has been in politics throughout his life, to consider giving power to his rival Mr. Raila Odinga, a Luo, a neglected tribe by the ruling party. After all, Odinga, 62, is younger than Kibaki, 76. In Scripture we read: “The length of our days is seventy years….” (Psalm 90:10) So it is time for Mr. Kibaki to think twice about his age, and especially more important than age to think about the needs of all the Kenyan people rather than the needs of just one tribe – the Kikuyu.
I’m not, however, trying to muddle with Kenyan internal politics; I know the Kenyans are capable of solving their own problems, but as a neighbor, I’m just offering a neighbor’s friendly advice to my Kenyan friends in Kenya.