Skip to content

Africa

Chinese telecom giant Huawei active in espionage; collaborates with African dictators

Is Huawei wiring Africa for surveillance? Or just for money?

By John Reed | Foreign Policy

Huawei

Chinese telecommunications giant Huawei may have been all-but-barred from doing business in the U.S. over allegations that it’s basically an intelligence agency masquerading as a tech business. In Africa, however, Huawei is thriving.

From Cairo to Johannesburg, the Chinese telecom has offices in 18 countries and has invested billions of dollars in building African communications networks since the late 1990s. The company’s cheap cellular phones today dominate many of Africa’s most important markets — and that was before Huawei teamed up with Microsoft earlier this year to launch a low-cost smartphone on the continent. Just in the past few months, the firm closed a pair of telecommunications deals in Africa each worth more than $700 million, part of an African business that brings in more than $3.5 billion annually for the Chinese firm. According to Huawei’s marketing materials, the projects are all part of a mission of “Enriching [African] Lives through Communication.” But current and former U.S. officials — as well as outside security analysts — worry there could be another agenda behind Huawei’s penetration into Africa. They suspect that the Chinese telecom could be wiring the continent for surveillance.

“There’s a great deal of concern about Huawei acting to advance the interests of the Chinese government in a strategic sense, which includes not only traditional espionage but as a vehicle for economic espionage,” former Department of Homeland Security secretary Michael Chertoff told FP. “If you build the network on which all the data flows, you’re in a perfect position to populate it with backdoors or vulnerabilities that only you know about, you’re upgrading it, each time you upgrade the network or service it, that’s an opportunity” to install spyware.

“That’s a strategic issue for the countries in Africa and a strategic issue for us,” added Chertoff.

Huawei spokesman William Plummer called such concerns “silliness,” noting that the company “did $35 billion in business last year, 70 percent outside of China. We will not compromise our commercial success for any government.”

China has made no secret of its interest in Africa, investing more than $67 billion into large-scale projects on the continent from 2006 to 2012. Hundreds of Chinese troops are helping keep the peace in Mali, while Beijing’s warships have contributed to the fight against pirates off the coast of Somalia for years. And no wonder: China is becoming increasingly dependent on Africa’s farms to feed its people, on Africa’s minerals to run its industries, and on Africa’s oil to fuel its cars. China needs Africa as a partner — the closer, the better.

Enter Huawei.

“Across Africa — but especially in demographically large or resource-rich nations — Huawei is offering exceptionally competitive prices, generous financing, and fully managed systems to governments that otherwise have grave difficulty expanding into broadband (and the internet in general),” Chris Demchak, co-director of the Center for Cyber Conflict Studies at the U.S. Naval War College, told Foreign Policy in an email.

Huawei isn’t just providing cell phones, towers and fiber-optic cable and then turning them over to local businesses. The telecom giant — and sometimes its Chinese rival ZTE — is often running these networks for the local communications providers and the government.

“Generally, most of the employees operating these systems are Chinese and the arrangements usually include delegating maintenance and decisions about future updates to Huawei as well, thus ensuring the Chinese firm’s control of the basic technological architecture’s foundation, evolution, and operations,” Demchak noted.

Devil Incarnate: TPLF and its historic venom against Christian & Muslim Ethiopians

TPLF:  Who were they then? Who are they now?

August 4, 2013

Gog Magog
Gog Magog

 

Gebremedhin Araya, a former top leader of the Tigrai People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), details the violence this rogue group directed in its early days against Ethiopia’s two prominent religions, Christianity and Islam.  Ignorance, greed and the lust for power sprinkled with shallow Albanian Marxism, were behind the TPLF’s assault on Ethiopia’s spiritual and cultural heritage.

The combination of ignorance and arrogance continues to this day.  The legitimate Ethiopian Orthodox  Tewahdo Church has been exiled.  The TPLF is now threatening to tear down Waldeba Monastery, one of the most revered places in Ethiopian Christendom.  The regime is also waging a relentless war of propaganda, imprisonment and murder against Ethiopian Muslims.  Their only fault is demanding the government to stay out of religious affairs.

 Please click on link below to read the English translation of Ato Gebremdhin Araya’s expose.

TPLF CRIMES AGAINST RELIGION

Ethiopia: Lives for Land in Gambella

Posted on

Donor duplicity and complicity in Ethiopian government crimes

By Graham Peebles | Counterpunch.org

August 2, 2013

“Three quarters of worldwide land acquisitions have taken place in Sub-Saharan Africa, where poverty ridden and economically vulnerable countries (many run by governments with poor human rights records) are ‘encouraged’ to attract foreign investment by donor partners and their international guides. The World Bank, International Monetary Fund (IMF) and donor partners, powerful institutions that by “supporting the creation of investment-friendly climates and land markets in developing countries” have been a driving force behind the global rush for agricultural land, the Oakland Institute (OI) report.”

 

Paradise-like land in Gambella is sold to foreigners as indigenous people are forced out
Paradise-like land in Gambella is sold to foreigners as indigenous people are forced out

To many people land is much more than a resource or corporate commodity to be bought, developed and sold for a profit. Identity, cultural history and livelihood are all connected to ‘place’. The erosion of traditional values and morality (which include the observation of human rights and environmental responsibility) are some of the many negative effects of the global neo-liberal economic model, with its focus on short-term gain and material benefit. The commercialisation of everything and everybody has become the destructive goal of multi-nationals, and their corporate governments manically driven by the desire for perpetual growth as the elixir to life’s problems.

Land for Profit

Since the food crisis in 2008 agricultural land in developing countries has been in high demand. Seen as a sound financial investment by foreign brokers and agrochemical firms, and as a way to create food security for their home market by corporations from Asia and the Middle East in particular.

Three quarters of worldwide land acquisitions have taken place in Sub-Saharan Africa, where poverty ridden and economically vulnerable countries (many run by governments with poor human rights records) are ‘encouraged’ to attract foreign investment by donor partners and their international guides. The World Bank, International Monetary Fund (IMF) and donor partners, powerful institutions that by “supporting the creation of investment-friendly climates and land markets in developing countries” have been a driving force behind the global rush for agricultural land, the Oakland Institute (OI) report in Unheard Voices (UV).

Poor countries make easy pickings for multi-nationals negotiating deals for prime land at giveaway prices and with all manner of government sweeteners. Contracts sealed without consultation with local people, which lack transparency and accountability, have virtually no benefit for the ‘host’ country (certainly none for indigenous groups), and as Oxfam make clear “have resulted in dispossession, deception, violation of human rights and destruction of livelihoods.”

Ethiopia is a prime target for investors looking to acquire agricultural land. Since 2008 The Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) government has leased almost 4 million hectares, for commercial farm ventures. Land is cheap – they are virtually giving it away, tax is non-existent and profits (like the food grown) are smoothly repatriated. Local people are swept aside by a government unconcerned with human rights and the observation of federal, or international, law. A perfect environment then, where shady deals can be done and large corporate profits made. In their desperation to be seen as one of the ‘growth gang’ and “to make way for agricultural land investments”, the Ethiopian government has “committed egregious human rights abuses, in direct violation of international law,” OI state.

Forced From Home

Bordering South Sudan the fertile Gambella region (where 42% of land is available), with its lush vegetation and flowing rivers, is where the majority of land sales in the country have taken place. Deals in the region are made possible by the EPRDF’s ‘villagisation programme’. This is forcibly clearing indigenous people off ancestral land and herding them into State created villages. The plan has been intensely criticised by human rights groups, and rightly so – 1.5 million people nationwide are destined to be re-settled, 225,000 (over three years) from Gambella.

More concerned to be seen as corporate buddy than guardian of the people, the Ethiopian government guarantees investors that it will clear land leased of everything and everyone. It has an obligation, OI says, to “deliver and hand over the vacant possession of leased land free of impediments”, swept clear of people, villages, forests and wildlife, and fully plumbed into local water supplies. Bulldozers are destroying the “farms, and grazing lands that have sustained Anuak, Mezenger, Nuer, Opo, and Komo peoples for centuries”, Cultural Survival (CS records: and dissent, should it occur, is brutally dealt with by the government, that promises to “provide free security against any riot, disturbance or any turbulent time.” (OI) ‘Since you do not accept what government says, we jail you.’” The elder told from Batpul village told Human Rights Watch (HRW). He was jailed without charge in Abobo, and held for more than two weeks, during which time “they turned me upside down, tied my legs to a pole, and beat me every day for 17 days until I was released.”

Hundreds of thousands of villagers, including pastoralists and indigenous people are being forcibly moved by the regime, HRW reports, they are “relocating them through violence and intimidation, and often without essential services”, such as education (denying children ‘the right to education’), water, and health care facilities – public services promised to the people and championed to donor countries by the government in their programme rhetoric.

Murder, rape, false imprisonment and torture are (reportedly) being committed by the Ethiopian military as they implement the federal governments policy of land clearance and re-settlement in accordance with its ‘villagisation programme’. ”My village was forced by the government to move to the new location against our will. I refused and was beaten and lost my two upper teeth”. This Anuak man told the NGO Inclusive Development International (IDI), His brother “was beaten to death by the soldiers for refusing to go to the new village. My second brother was detained and I don’t know where he was taken by the soldiers”.

To the Anuak People, who are the majority tribal group in the affected areas, their land is who they are. It’s where the material to build their homes is found it’s their source of traditional medicines and food. It’s where their ancestors are buried and where their history rests. By driving these people off their land and into large settlements or camps, the government is not only destroying their homes, in which they have lived for generations, it is stealing their identity. Indigenous people tell of violent intimidation, beatings, arbitrary arrest and detention, torture in military custody, rape and extra-judicial killing. State criminality breaching a range of international and indeed federal laws, that Genocide Watch (GW) consider “to have already reached Stage 7 (of 8), genocide massacres”, against the Anuak, as well as the people of Oromia, Omo and the Ogaden region.

The Ethiopian government is legally bound to obtain the ‘free, informed and prior consent’ of the indigenous people it plans to move. Far from obtaining consent, Niykaw Ochalla in Unheard Voices, states that, “when [the government] comes to take their land, it is without their knowledge, and in fact [the government] says that they no longer belonged to this land, [even though] the Anuak have owned it for generations”. Consultation, consent and compensation the ‘three c’s required by federal and international law. Constitutional duties and legal requirements, which like a raft of other human rights obligations the regime dutifully ignores. Nyikaw Ochalla confirms that “there is “no consultation at all”, sometimes people are warned they have to move, but just as often OI found the military “instruct people to get up and move the same day”. And individuals receive no compensation “for their loss of livelihood and land.“ In extensive research The Oakland Institute “did not find any instances of government compensation being paid to indigenous populations evicted from their lands”, this despite binding legal requirements to do so.

‘Waiting here for death’

The picture of state intimidation in Gambella is a familiar one. Refugees in Dadaab, Kenya, from the Ogaden region of Ethiopia, recount stories of the same type of abuse, indeed as do people from Oromia and the Lower Omo valley. Tried and tested Government methodology used to enforce repressive measures and create fear amongst the people. “The first mission for all the military and the Liyuu is to make the people of the Ogaden region afraid of us”, a former commander of the Liyuu police told me. And to achieve this crushing end, they are told “to rape and kill, to loot, to burn their homes, and capture their animals”. From a wealth of information collated by HRW and the OI, it is clear that the Ethiopian military in Gambella is following the same criminal script as their compatriots in the Ogaden region.

We were at home on our farm, a 17-year-old girl from Abobo in Gambella (whose story echoes many), told HRW “when soldiers came up to us: ‘Do you accept to be relocated or not?’ ‘No.’ So they grabbed some of us. ‘Do you want to go now?’ ‘No.’ Then they shot my father and killed him”, a villager from Gooshini, now in exile in South Sudan, described how those in his settlement “that resisted…. were forced by soldiers to roll around in the mud in a stagnant water pool then beaten”.

The new settlements that make up the villagisation programme, are built on land that is “typically dry and arid”, completely unsuitable for farming and miles from water supplies, which are reserved for the industrial farms being constructed on fertile ancestral land. The result is increased food insecurity leading in some cases to starvation. HRW documented cases of people being forced off their land during the “harvest season, preventing them from harvesting their crops”. With such levels of cruelty and inhumanity the people feel desperate, “as one displaced individual told Human Rights Watch, “The government is killing our people through starvation and hunger . . . we are just waiting here for death”.

And should families try to leave the new settlement (something they are discouraged from doing), and return to their village homes, the government destroys them totally, burning houses and bulldozing the land. “The government brought the Anuak people here to die. They brought us no food, they gave away our land to the foreigners so we can’t even move back,” HRW record in ‘Waiting Here for Death’. People forced into the new villages are fearful of government assault, parents “are afraid to send their children to school because of the increased army presence. Parents worry that their children will be assaulted”. (UV)

In the face of such government atrocities the people feel powerless; but like many suffering injustice throughout the world, they are awakening demanding justice and the observation of fundamental human rights. “We don’t have any means of retrieving our land” Mr.O from the village of Pinykew in Gambella, told The Guardian (22/01/2013). “Villagers have been butchered, falsely arrested and tortured, the women subjected to mass rape”. Enraged by such atrocities, he is bringing what could be a landmark legal case against Britain’s Department for International Development (DfiD). Leigh Day & Co, solicitors based in London, have taken the case, “arguing that money from DfiD is funding the villagisation programme”, that “breaches the department’s own human rights policies.” DfiD administer the £324 million given by the British government to Ethiopia, making it the biggest recipient of aid from the country. They deny supporting forced re-location, but their own documents reveal British funds are paying the salaries “of officials implementing the programme and for infrastructure in new villages”, The Daily Mail 25/05/2013 reports. Allegations reinforced by HRW, who state that “British aid is having an enormous, negative side effect – and that is the forcible ending of these indigenous people’s way of life”. (Ibid)

In an account that rings with familiarity, Mr.O, now in Dadaab refugee camp, says he was forced from his village at gunpoint by the military. At first he refused to leave, so “soldiers from the Ethiopian National Defence Force (ENDF) beat me with guns.” He was arrested, imprisoned in military barracks and tortured for three days, after which time he was taken to the new village, which “did not have water, food or productive fields”, where he was forced to build his house.

Government Duplicity, Donor Complicity

The government unsurprisingly denies all allegations of widespread human rights abuse connected with land deals and the ‘villagisation programme’ specifically. They continue to espouse the ‘promised public service and infrastructure benefits’ of the scheme that “by and large” OI assert, “have failed to materialise”. The regime is content to ignore documentation provided by human rights groups and NGOs and until recently had refused to cooperate with an investigation by the World Bank into allegations of abuse raised by indigenous Anuak people. The Bank incidentally that gives Ethiopia more financial aid than any other developing country, $920 million last year alone. Former regional president Omod Obang Olum oversaw the plan in Gambella and assures us resettlement is “voluntary” and “the programme successful”. Predictable duplicitous comments that IDI said “are laughable”.

An independent non-profit group working to advance human rights in development, IDI, has helped the Anuak people from Gambella “submit a complaint to the World Bank Inspection Panel implicating the Bank in grave human rights abuses perpetrated by the Ethiopian Government“. The complaint alleges, “that the Anuak people have been severely harmed by the World Bank-financed and administered Providing Basic Services Project (PBS)”. A major development porgramme, which is described as “expanding access and improving the quality of basic services in education, health, agriculture, water supply and sanitation”, OI report. However IDI make clear that “villagisation is the principle vehicle through which PBS is being implemented in Gambella”, and claim “there is “credible evidence” of “gross human rights violations” being committed in the region by the Ethiopian military. Human Rights Watch (HRW) found that donors are “paying for the construction of schools, health clinics, roads, and water facilities in the new [resettlement] villages. They are also funding agricultural programs directed towards resettled populations and the salaries of the local government officials who are implementing the policy”. (Ibid)

IDI’s serious allegations further support those made by many people from the region and Mr.O in his legal action against the DfID. The Banks inspection panel have said the “two programmes (PBS and villagisation) depend one each other, and may mutually influence the results of the other.” The panel found “there is a plausible link between the two programmes but needs to engage in further fact-finding”. It is imperative the bank’s Inspection Panel have unrestricted access to Gambella and people feel safe to speak openly about the governments brutality.

All groups involved in land sales have both a moral duty – a civil responsibility and – a legal obligation to the people whose land is being leased. The Ethiopian government, the foreign corporations leasing the land and the donors – the World Bank and DfID, who, through PBS are funding the villagisation programme.

The Ethiopian government is in violation of a long list of international treatise that, in- keeping with their democratic pretentions, they are happy to sign up to, but less enthusiastic to observe. From the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and all points legal in between. Investors if not legally obliged, are certainly morally bound by the United Nations (UN) “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework, which, amongst other things, makes clear their duty to respect and work within human rights. Donor’s responsibility first and last is, to the people of Ethiopia, to ensure any so-called ‘development’ programmes (that commonly focus on economic targets), support their needs, ensures their wellbeing and observes their fundamental human rights.

To continue to turn a blind eye to widespread government abuse, and to support schemes, whether directly or indirectly, that violate human rights and cause suffering to the people is to be complicit to State criminality that is shattering the lives of hundreds of thousands of indigenous people, in Gambella and indeed elsewhere in the country.

Graham Peebles is director of the Create Trust. He can be reached at: [email protected]

ለዚህ መንግሥት ታላቅ ክብር አለኝ — ሻለቃ ሃይሌ ገ/ሥላሴ

Posted on

By Goolgule.com

July 24, 2013

haile-gebreselasse

 

የዛሬ 10 ወር የሻለቃ ሃይሌ ገ/ሥላሴ ወደ ፖለቲካ የመምጣት ሁኔታን አስመልክቶ ጎልጉል የድረገጽ ጋዜጣ ሃተታ አቅርቦ ነበር፡፡ (እዚህ ላይ ይመልከቱት) ሰሞኑን አትሌቱ ወደ ፖለቲካው የመግባት ፍላጎቱንና “በምርጫ” ለመወዳደር መፈለጉ ብዙ እየተባለበት ይገኛል፡፡ ከዚህ አንጻር አሁን ላለው ሁኔታ ግንዛቤ ይሰጣል በማለት ከዚህ በፊት ያቀረብነውን ሃተታ በድጋሚ አትመነዋል፡፡


“ለኢትዮጵያ የጥምር መንግስት ያስፈልጋታል” በማለት በ1997 ምርጫ አጥብቆ ሲከራከር የነበረውና በአሁኑ ወቅት በከፍተኛ ደረጃ ኢንቨስትመንት ውስጥ የገባው ሻለቃ ሃይሌ ገብረስላሴ በኢትዮጵያ ቀደም ሲል ከነበሩት መንግስታትና ትውልዶች ይልቅ አሁን ላለው ትውልድ ከበሬታ እንዳለው በመግለጽ አስተያየቱን ሰነዘረ። የክብር ሪኮርዶቹን በሙሉ ለቀነኒሳ ያስረከበው ሃይሌ በእጁ የሚገኘውን ብቸኛ ሃብቱን (የህዝብ ክብር) እያሟጠጠ መሆኑ እየተገለጸ ነው።

ሃይሌ ይህንን የተናገረው መስከረም 12 ቀን 2004 ዓ ም ከተለያዩ አስተያየት ሰጪዎች ጋር በመንግስት ቴሌቪዥን (ኢቲቪ) አስተያየት በሰጠበት ወቅት ነበር። የቀድሞውን ስርዓትና ትውልድ “ድንጋይ ዳቦ በነበረበት፣ ፍራፍሬ ከጫካ ያለምንም ድካም ከሚሰበሰብበት” ዘመን ጋር ያወዳደረው ሃይሌ፣ “የአሁኑ ትውልድ” በማለት ያሞካሸውን ስርዓት ከተፈጥሮ ጋር ጦርነት በማካሄድ ለውጥ ማስመዝገበ መቻላቸውን አስምሮበታል።

“የባለ ራዕዩ መሪ” አቶ መለስ ገድል ለመዘከር በተዘጋጀ ቅንብር ላይ  በተደጋጋሚ አስተያየት ሲሰጥ የታየው ሃይሌ “አሁን የት ነው ያለነው?” በማለት ጠይቆ “አሜሪካ ኤምባሲ ቪዛ ለማግኘት ነው የምንጋፋው? አውሮፓ ሄደን እዛው ለመቅረት ነው…” በማለት ስደትን መርጠው ከአገራቸው የሚወጡትን ሸርድዶ አልፏል። አሁን ባለው የኢትዮጵያ ወቅታዊ ሁኔታ ለስደት የሚዳርግ ጉዳይ የለም ወደ ማለት አዝምሞ ተናግሯል። ሃይሌ ይህን ይበል እንጂ በተቃራኒው እስረኞች እንዲፈቱና የፖለቲካ እርቅ እንዲሰፍን እሰራለሁ ከሚሉት ፕሮፌሰር ይስሃቅ ጋር በሽምግልና እያገለገለ መሆኑ በአገሪቱ ውስጥ የሚታው እስርና እንግልት ከፍተኛ ደረጃ ላይ መድረሱን የሚጠቅሱ አስተያየት ሰጪዎች የሃይሌን አስተያየት “ለንብረት ዋስትና የሚከፈል የንግግር ቫት” በማለት አጣጥለውታል።

ከኤርትራ ጋር ከተደረገው በቀር በኢትዮጵያ ይህ ነው የሚባል ጦርነት እንዳልተካሔደ ኢህአዴግን የሰላም አባት አስመስሎ ሃይሌ አመልክቷል። በዚሁም ምክንያት ቀደም ሲል ለጦርነት ይውል የነበረው የአገሪቱ በጀት ሙሉ በሙሉ ወደ ልማት ዞሯል ብሏል። የኢህአዴግ ተወካይ መስሎ አስተያየት የሰጠው ሃይሌ “ይህ አሁን የታየው ለውጥ በአስርና አስራ አንድ ዓመት ውስጥ የታየ ነው። አሁን ባለው አካሄድ ከአስር ዓመት በኋላ እንደርሳለን?” ሲል የራሱን ትንቢት አስቀምጧል።

ተቆራርጦ በሚቀርበው አስተያየት እነ ፕሮፌሰር እንድሪያስን በማጀብ ሃይሌ  በመዝገበ ቃላት ላይ ኢትዮጵያን “ረሃብ” በማለት የሚተረጉማት ቃል እንደሚቀየር በልበ ሙሉነት ተናግሯል። “ከሃያ ዓመት በኋላ” አለ ሃይሌ “በመዝገበ ቃላት ላይ የኢትዮጵያ ውርስ ትርጉም ሃብታም በሚል ይቀየራል” ብሏል።

“ድሮ ትረዱን ነበር፤ እናመሰግናለን። አሁን ደግሞ እንረዳችሀዋለን እንላቸዋለን” ሲል አውሮፓና አሜሪካን የመሳሰሉ ታላላቅ አገሮች የኢትዮጵያን እጅ እንደሚናፍቁ ሃይሌ ከምኞት ባለፈ ስሜት ውስጥ ሆኖ ተናግሯል። አገሪቱን ለሃያ አንድ ዓመታት ሲመሩ የነበሩት አቶ መለስ ባልገለጹበት ሁኔታ ሃይሌ ከአስር እስከ ሃያ ዓመት ኢትዮጵያ ሃብታም አገር እንደምትሆን መናገሩ ከምን የመነጨ እንደሆነ ሊገባቸው እንዳልቻለ ብዙዎች እየገለጹ ነው።

“ሙስና ከፍተኛ ደረጃ ደርሷል” ሲል ኢህአዴግን የመከረው ሃይሌ የበታች ባለስልጣናት መንግስትን እንዳያሰድቡ መክሯል። “መንግስት ይህንን አድርጉ ላይል ይችላል” የሚለው ሃይሌ የበታች ባለስልጣኖች የሚፈጽሙት ሙስና “መንግስትን ያስወቅሰዋል” በሚል ተቆርቋሪነቱን በይፋ አስታውቋል። ዋናዎቹን የሙስና ተዋናዮች ነጻ በማውጣት የታች ባለስልጣኖችን “እያንገዋለለ” አሳጥቷቸዋል።

“… ለህሊናቸው ሲሉ እንደ መንግስት በማሰብ መስራት አለባቸው” ሲል ትዕዛዝ አዘል ምክርና ማሳሰቢያ ለበታች ባለስልጣናት ያስተላለፈው ሃይሌ የአስተያየቱ መነሻ ከኢህአዴግ ጋር የፈጠረው ዝምድና ውጤት እንደሆነ እየተነገረ ነው። አንድ አስተያየት ሰጪ “ሃይሌ ሃብቱ እየበዛ ሲሄድና የተበደረው ገንዘብ ሲጨምር ኢህአዴግን ወክሎ መናገር ጀመረ” ብለዋል።

አትሌቶችን ሰብስቦ የአቶ መለሰን ሃዘን ሳግ በያዘው ድምጽ እያለቀሰ የገለጸው ሃይሌ ነፍሳቸውን ይማረውና በአቶ መለስ አይወደድም ነበር። በህይወት እያሉም በተደጋጋሚ ያናንቁት ነበር። ሃይሌን እንደሚያደንቁት ተጠይቀው አርቲስት ቻቺን በማሞገስ ጭራሹኑ እንደማያወቁት ዘለውት አልፈውት ነበር። ኢህአዴግ በተለይም ህወሃት ለሃይሌ ቁብ እንደሌላቸው የሚያውቀው ሃይሌ ከአንድ ማስታወቂያ ሰራተኛ ልቆ በፕሮፓጋንዳ ተግባር ላይ መሰማራቱ በቅርብ ጓደኞቹና በአድናቂዎቹ ዘንድ መነጋገሪያ አድርጎታል።

በአዳማው የኢህአዴግ ጉባኤ ላይ በመገኘት ውድ ሽልማቱን ለሟቹ ጠቅላይ ሚኒስትር በማበርከት የመንግስት ቴሌቪዥን ላይ የታየው ሃይሌ፤ በዚያው ጉባኤ ላይ አቶ መለስንና ኢህአዴግን ማሞገሱ በወቅቱ በርካታ አስተያየት እንዲሰነዘርበት ምክንያት መሆኑ አይዘነጋም። የጎልጉል የአዲስ አበባ መረጃ አቀባይ ያነጋገራቸው እንዳሉት ሃይሌ ወደ ፖለቲካው መንደር በፍጥነት እየተንደረደረ መሆኑን በማስረዳት የሚያውቁትንም ተናግረዋል።

ጣና ሃይቅ ዳርቻ ከልማት ባንክ በአርባ ሚሊዮን ብር የገዛውን ሆቴል ከሁለት ወር በኋላ ሼኽ መሃመድ አላሙዲ በትዕዛዝ እንደነጠቁት በታላቅ ቅሬታ ለህዝብ አስታውቆ የነበረው ሃይሌ የባህር ዳርን ቤተ መንግስት የመጠቅለል ታላቅ ፍላጎት እንዳለው ነው የቅርብ ወዳጁ ለመረጃ አቀባያችን የተናገሩት።

በኦሜድላ ስፖርት ክለብ ውስጥ ሰራተኛ የነበሩትና ለደህንነታቸው ሲሉ ስማቸው እንዳይጠቀስ የጠየቁ የሃይሌ ቅርብ ሰው “ሃይሌ ቤተመንግስትን ይወዳል። ኢትዮጵያንም የመምራት ህልም አለው” በማለት ጭራሽ ተሰምቶ በማያውቀው ጉዳይ አስተያየታቸውን ይጀምራሉ።

የአማራ ክልል መንግስት ለሲድኒ ኦሊምፒክ ጀግኖች ግብዣ ባደረገበት ወቅት የባህር ዳር ቤተ መንግስት ጎብኝተው እንደነበር አስተያየት ሰጪው ያስታውሳሉ። ሃይሌ የጃንሆይን መኝታ ክፍል ከተመለከተ በኋላ አሰበ። ከአፍታ በኋላ አልጋቸው ላይ ተቀመጠ። አልጋውን ወደ ላይ ወደታች ካወዛወዘው በኋላ “… ይህንን ቤተ መንግስት…” በማለት እንደሚኖርበት መዛቱን አስታውሰው ተናግረዋል።

ሃይሌ ዝም ብሎ እንደማይናገር ያወሱት እኚሁ በቅርብ የሚያውቁት ሰው ሃይሌ ይህንኑ ህልሙን ተግባራዊ ለማድረግ ዘመቻ የጀመረ እንደሚመስላቸው አስታውቀዋል። በቀጣዩ 2005 ምርጫ ሃይሌ እንደሚሳተፍ በርግጠኛነት ተናግረዋል። ሃይሌ ሁለት ጊዜ በግል ፓርላማ ለመግባት እንደሚወዳደር ካስታወቀ በኋላ ባልታወቀ ምክንያት ራሱን ከምርጫ ዘመቻ ማግለሉን መግለጹ ይታዋሳል።

ሃይሌ ፖለቲከኛ የመሆን የኖረ ህልም እንዳለው ያወሱት ባልደረባው ከተናገሩት በተቃራኒ ሃይሌ የፈለገውን መሆንና ማድረግ የግል ውሳኔው እንደሆነ የሚከራከሩለት አልጠፉም። ሃይሌ ሃብት አለው፣ ከፍተኛ ዝና ገንብቷል። ኢትዮጵያዊያን የማይረዱት እውቅናና ክብር በውጪው ዓለም እንዳለው የሚገልጹት ተከራካሪዎች “አንድ ሰው በተናገረ ቁጥር ለንግግሩ ቀንድና ጭራ መቀጠል ነውር ነው። ሰዎች የመሰላቸውን እንዳይናገሩም የሚገድብ ክፉ ልምድ ነው” ባይ ናቸው። “አያይዘውም ሃይሌ የኢህአዴግ አባል ቢሆን እንኳ አስገራሚ አይሆንም” በማለት ጠርዝ ደርሰው ይሟገታሉ።

በርካታ አትሌቶች የኦህዴድ አባላት እንደሆኑ የሚጠቁሙት እነዚህ የሃይሌ ተከራካሪዎች “ሃይሌ ኢህአዴግን ቢቀላቀል መነጋገሪያ የሚሆነው ጉዳይ ብአዴን ወይስ ኦህዴድ ይሆናል የሚለው ነው” ብለዋል። አርሲ የተወለደው ሃይሌ በሩጫ ከተሳካለት በኋላ በተለያዩ ጉዳዮችና መጠነኛ ግንባታ ወደ ባህር ዳር መጠጋጋቱ በትውልድ አካባቢው ተወላጆች ቅሬታ እንዳስነሳበት በተለያዩ ጊዚያቶች መዘገቡ የሚታወስ ነው።

ጴጥሮስ ያቺን ቃል!

Posted on

By Goolgule.com

July 30, 2013

ፋሺስቶች ያገራችንን አርበኞች ሽፍታ ቢሏቸው እውነት እንዳይመስላችሁ፡፡ ሸፍታ ማለት ያለ አገሩ መጥቶ የሰውን አገር የሚወር ይህ በመካከላችሁ መጥቶ የቆመ አረመኔው የኢጣሊያ ፋሺስት ነው፡፡ የኢትዮጵያ ሕዝብ ለእርሱ እንዳይገዛ ውጉዝ ነው፡፡ የኢትዮጵያ መሬት እንዳትቀበለው የተገዘተች ትሁን፡፡” አቡነ ጴጥሮስ፡፡

Abune Petros hawult

 

ዛሬ ሐምሌ 22 ቀን ጀግናው ሰማዕት አቡነ ጴጥሮስ በግፍ የተገደሉበት ቀን ነው፡፡ እኒህ ታላቅ አባት ለሰማዕትነት ያበቃቸው ዋናው ምክንያት በወቅቱ ለተጠየቁት ቀላል ለሚመስል ጥያቄ “ቃሌን አልክድም” ብለው በመቆማቸው ነበር፡፡

ፋሺስት ኢጣሊያ አገራችንን ወርሮ ሕዝቡን ባስጨነቀ ጊዜ አቡነ ጴጥሮስ ከአርበኛው ጋር በመቆም የጣሊያንን ሠራዊት በድፍረት ሲቃወሙና አርበኛውንም ሲደግፉ ቆይተዋል፡፡ ሆኖም ከጊዜያት በኋላ በፋሺስቶች ቁጥጥር ሥር ከዋሉ በኋላ ጣሊያኖች ራሳቸው በሰየሟቸው ዳኞች ፊት አቡኑን ለፍርድ በማቅረብ ከላይ ሲታይ በጣም ቀላል የሚመስል ጥያቄ ያቀርቡላቸዋል፡፡ የጥያቄው ዓላማ አቡኑን የጣሊያን ተገዢ ለማድረግ ብቻ ሳይሆን በወቅቱ የነበረውን ሕዝባዊ ዓመጽ ለማብረድ ቢቻልም ደግሞ የብዙሃኑን ድጋፍ ለማግኘት የታሰበበት ነበር፡፡

ስለዚህም የግራዚያኒ ዳኞች አቡነ ጴጥሮስን ለፍርድ ባቀረቧቸው ጊዜ የጠየቋቸው “ሊቀጳጳሱ አቡነ ቄርሎስ እንዲሁም ሌሎች የጣሊያንን የበላይነት ተቀብለዋል፤ እርስዎም እንዲሁ ተቀብለው ሌሎችም እንዲቀበሉ ቢያደርጉ ይሻላል፤ ብቻዎን ማመጽ ምንም አይሰራልዎትም፤ ይህንን ቢያደርጉ ምን ይመስልዎታል …” የሚል እንድምታ ነበረው፡፡ … አቡኑም “ከመሞት መሰንበት” በማለት የቀረበላቸውን ምክር አዘል አስተያየት መቀበል አላቃታቸውም፡፡ ሆኖም ለእምነታቸውና ለሕዝባቸው የገቡትን ቃል ከሚክዱ ሞትን እንደሚመርጡ በድፍረት ለዳኞቹ መለሱላቸው፤ እንዲህም አሉ፤

“አቡነ ቄርሎስ ግብጻዊ ናቸው፤ ስለኢትዮጵያና ኢትዮጵያዊያን የሚገዳቸው ነገር የለም፡፡ እኔ ግን ኢትዮጵያዊ ነኝ … ስለ አገሬና ስለ ቤተክርስቲያኔ እቆረቆራለሁ … እኔን ለመግደል እንደወሰናችሁ አውቃለሁ፡፡ በእኔ ላይ የፈለጋችሁትን አድርጉ” የሚል ነበር፡፡ (ጳውሎስ ኞኞ “የኢትዮጵያና የኢጣሊያ ጦርነት” አ.አ. 1980፤ ገጽ 157)

ረቡዕ ሐምሌ 22 ቀን 1928ዓም (July 29, 1936) አቡነ ጴጥሮስ ከፊት ለፊታቸው የተደገነውን የጣሊያንን መትረየስ ሳይፈሩ ከመገደላቸው ከጥቂት ደቂቃዎች በፊት የሚከተለውን በመናገር የመጨረሻ ቃላቸውን ሰጡ፡፡

“ፋሺስቶች ያገራችንን አርበኞች ሽፍታ ቢሏቸው እውነት እንዳይመስላችሁ፡፡ ሽፍታ ማለት ያለ አገሩ መጥቶ የሰውን አገር የሚወር ይህ በመካከላችሁ መጥቶ የቆመ አረመኔው የኢጣሊያ ፋሺስት ነው፡፡ የኢትዮጵያ ሕዝብ ለእርሱ እንዳይገዛ ውጉዝ ነው፡፡ የኢትዮጵያ መሬት እንዳትቀበለው የተገዘተች ትሁን፡፡” (ዝ.ከ.፤ ገጽ 157)

አቡነ ጴጥሮስ ይህንን ከተናገሩ በኋላ የፋሺስት የጦር መኮንኖችና ጄኔራሎች በተሰበሰቡበት አደባባይ የተሰማው የማያቋርጥ የጥይት እሩምታ ነበር፡፡ በእጃቸው ከያዙት መስቀል በቀር “መሣሪያ” በእጃቸው ያልነበራቸው የሃይማኖት አባት የተናገሩት ቃልና ያደረጉት ቆራጥ ውሳኔ የግራዚያኒን ጦር ወኔ ሰለበው፡፡ ለአቡኑ አንድ ጥይት አልበቃ ብሏቸው የመትረየስ እሩምታ ተኩስ በመልቀቅ በግፍ ረሸኗቸው፡፡

abune_petros removed

የአቡነ ጴጥሮስ ሃውልት ሲነሳ (ፎቶ Fortune)

ፍርሃት ለአንድ ሰው መትረየስ ያስተኩሳል፤ ለአይጥ ታንክ ያሰልፋል፤ “ለቄጠማ ሰይፍ ያስመዝዛል”፤ የመናገርና የመጻፍ መብቴ ይከበር ለሚል የጸረ አሸባሪ ሕግ ያስወጣል፤ ሰላማዊውን ሰው “አሸባሪ” ያስብላል፡፡ ፍርሃት ያስደነግጣል፤ ያስፈራል፤ ያንቀጠቅጣል፤ ያሸብራል፡፡ ፈሪ የደፋሩ ድፍረት ያስደንቀዋል፤ ድፍረቱን ይመኛል፤ ከዚያ ለመውጣት ግን ራሱ ፍርሃት አንቆ ይይዘዋል፤ ፍርሃት ራሱ ፈሪውን ያስፈራዋል፤ “አልገዛም፤ ቃሌን አልለውጥም” የሚለው የደፋሩ ውሳኔና ቆራጥነት እጅግ ስለሚያሸብረው ራሱ ተሸብሮ ሽብር ይነዛል፤ ያስራል፤ ያሰቃያል፤ ይገድላል፡፡ አልበቃ ሲለው ሃውልት ያስፈርሳል፡፡ ግን አይረካም፤ ምክንያቱም ፍርሃት ሳይሆን ነጻነት ነው ርካታን የሚሰጠው፡፡ ስለዚህ እንደፈራ ኖሮ እንደፈራ ይሞታል፤ ቃሉን የሚጠብቀው ግን በነጻነት ኖሮ በነጻነት ይሞታል፤ ሞቶም ግን በቃሉ ምክንያት ይታወሳል፡፡ የጴጥሮስ ቃል መቼም አይሞትም!!

(ይህ ጽሁፍ ከዚህ በፊት በተመሳሳይ ርዕስ አቶ መክብብ ማሞ ከጻፉት ጦማር ላይ በሰጡን ፈቃድ ለወቅቱ በሚመች መልኩ የቀረበ ነው፤ ለጸሐፊው ምስጋናችን ይድረሳቸው፤ ፎቶ wikimapia)

Power Africa? Empower Africans!

youth powerPower, power, power…

When President Obama recently visited Africa, he announced a “Power Africa” initiative.  In his Cape Town University speech, he proclaimed, “I am proud to announce a new initiative. We’ve been dealing with agriculture.  We’ve been dealing with health. Now we’re going to talk about power: Power Africa, a new initiative that will double access to power in sub-Saharan Africa. Double it.  We’re going to start by investing $7 billion in U.S. government resources. We’re going to partner with the private sector, who themselves have committed more than $9 billion in investment.”

In the speech, President Obama used the word “power” 21 times in a variety of contexts. He philosophized about “power that comes from acting on our ideals” and the  “power of human beings to affect change”. He urged Africans to act “through the power of your example”. He encouraged support for programs “that empower women”. He mildly chided “those in power who make arguments to distract people from their own abuses.”

He puzzled over “what it will take to empower individual Africans” and enable Africans to have the “power to feed themselves.” He pleaded for “unleashing the power of entrepreneurship and market” and the creation of “partnership that empowers Africans.” He spoke about “the power to prevent illness and care for the sick” and “the power to connect their people to the promise of the 21st century.”

He lamented “Africa’s lack of access to power” and the need “to have power.”  He “talked about power — Power Africa” and “doubling access to power in sub-Saharan Africa.” He pitied those Africans who “live currently off the power grid.”

He wistfully spoke about Nelson Mandela “leaving power” which “was as profound as his ability to claim power”. He spoke of Mugabe’s “corruption of power” and Zimbabwe’s economic collapse.

To power Africa or to empower Africans, that is the question

Africa has a power problem. There is no question about that. Africa needs protection from thugs-cum-leaders who abuse power, misuse power, confuse power and excuse and justify their abuse and misuse of power. President Obama is already powering Africa. Every year, he hands out billions of dollars to Africa’s worst dictators (excuse me, he calls them “partners”) who abuse power in countries like Ethiopia.  Africa needs people power not thugs in power.

On second thought, Africa does not have a power problem.  Africa has a problem of powerlessness. The people are powerless against thugtators who use power to abuse their human rights. Africans are powerless against the powerful forces of corruption – officials and their cronies who “illicitly transfer” (steal and stash) tens of billions of dollars in foreign banks. For instance, “Ethiopia lost $11.7 billion to outflows of ill-gotten gains between 2000 and 2009” and  “in 2009, illicit money leaving the country totaled $3.26 billion.” Africans are powerless and disempowered against powerful election thieves who claim electoral victory by 99.6 percent. Africans are powerless against powerful warlords who seek to divide them along ethnic, religious, linguistic and regional lines. Yes, Africa’s powerless have a big problem with Africa’s powerful thugtators.

President Obama does not seem to get it. The question is not whether to power Africa but how to protect powerless Africans from those dictators America has powered and empowered by doling out billions of dollars in aid, loans and technical assistance every year. If he wants to power Africa, he should begin by empowering ordinary Africans against those who abuse and misuse their power. He should power up the youth grid that remains unused, abused and disused by those who manage the political power grid. He should use the billions of dollars of annual aid to disempower the few powerful African thugtators and empower the hundreds of millions of African youth.

Last week, in his New York Times opinion piece, Eskinder Nega, the symbol of press freedom in Ethiopia and Africa, made a simple but effective recommendation to President Obama: “I propose that the United States impose economic sanctions on Ethiopia (while continuing to extend humanitarian aid without precondition) and impose travel bans on Ethiopian officials implicated in human rights violations.” This proposal is in line with established U.S. policy. Beginning in 2001, the U.S. has imposed “targeted sanctions on the Government of Zimbabwe, including restrictions on U.S. support for multilateral financing, financial sanctions against selected individuals and entities, travel sanctions against selected individuals, a ban on transfers of defense items and services, and a suspension of non-humanitarian government-to-government assistance.” The official reason for these sanctions is the “Zimbawean Government’s increasing assault on human rights and the rule of law.” The human rights record of the regime in Ethiopia is far worse than the regime in Zimbabwe. That is a fact that can be demonstrated. President Obama should understand that what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

If Obama wants to power Africa, let him empower African youth

President Obama has been talking about empowering African youth for years. In August 2010, he talked about launching “the Young African Leaders Initiative (YALI) as a signature initiative that supports young African leaders as they work to spur growth and prosperity, strengthen democratic governance, and enhance peace and security across the continent.” In June 2012, some “60 young African leaders” participated in “the Innovation Summit and Mentoring Partnership with Young African Leaders” for a “three-week professional development program”. To support the “empowerment of young African leaders” and provide them “significant and ongoing professional training, access to mentorship, and networking opportunities in Africa”, USAID “awarded two grants totaling $1.3 million to support the core principles of Young African Leaders Initiative.” In his Cape Town speech, President Obama told Africa’s young people: “You get to decide where the future lies.  Think about it — over 60 percent of Africans are under 35 years old.  So demographics means young people are going to be determining the fate of this continent and this country.  You’ve got time and numbers on your side, and you’ll be making decisions long after politicians like me have left the scene.” But Africa’s young people do not have the numbers on their side. They got $1.3 million from America while  Africa’s dictators get billions every year.

In June 2013, President Obama talked about “launching a new program” called the “Washington Fellowship for Young African Leaders” which is “going to give thousands of promising young Africans the opportunity to come to the United States and develop skills at some of our best colleges and universities.” A lot of nice talk and promises for African young people; but promises and talk are more convincing when one puts money where one’s mouth is. Since YALI, there has been more talk than action.

But there is another side to the African youth story. President Obama in Cape Town said, “And I’ve traveled to Africa on this trip because my bet is on the young people who are the heartbeat of Africa’s story.  I’m betting on all of you.” Which segment of the African youth is he betting on? The Washington Fellowship for Young African Leaders promises to “give thousands of promising young Africans” the “opportunity to come to the United States and develop their skills.”

What about the millions of not-so-promising African youths who waste away in the urban areas without educational and employment opportunities? What about those African youths mired in rural poverty unable to get even the most basic educational services? Those young Africans who have acquired college education but are unable to find employment because they are not connected to the ruling parties in Africa? Those young Africans who are leaving the continent for menial employment in the Middle East and elsewhere and are subjected to the most inhumane conditions and treatment. Recently, BBC reported the discovery of a grave in the desert of Yemen containing some 400 bodies of young Ethiopian immigrants escaping the oppressive conditions in Ethiopia. Do the not-so-promising youth matter to President Obama?

Along the same lines, what does President Obama offer Africa’s young freedom fighters? In 2009, in Accra, Ghana, he warned, “Now, make no mistake: History is on the side of these brave Africans, not with those who use coups or change constitutions to stay in power. Africa doesn’t need strongmen, it needs strong institutions.”

Does President Obama know of brave young Africans in prison named Eskinder Nega, Reeyot Alemu, Woubshet Taye, Andualem Aragie, Olbana Lelisa, Bekele Gerba, Abubekar Ahmed, Ahmedin Jebel  and so many thousands of Ethiopian political prisoners? President Obama needs to live up to the standards he set for Africans and answer one question: Is he, like history, on the side of brave Africans or is he on the side of Africa’s strongmen. President Obama must choose between making brave young Africans strong or African strongmen stronger.

Would $7 billion make a difference?

Lighting the dark continent is a daunting task. Enlightening the benighted “leaders” of the dark continent is an even more daunting fact. Over 130 years after the invention of the light bulb, the vast majority of Africans remain in total darkness. It is a historical enigma that as technology enlightens the world, Africa is enveloped in darkness. For instance, Ethiopia got a functioning telephone system in 1894 and over the past decade “invested some USD$14 billion in infrastructure development” including communications. Yet today Ethiopia has the worst telecommunications system in Africa and quite possibly the world.

Power outages and blackouts are common in every part of Africa. In June 2012, as U.S. Secretary of State Hilary Clinton began her speech at the African Union, she experienced firsthand what Africans face every day. She had to stop her speech because of power outage.

Africa’s electrical power problem is not merely low access and insufficient capacity; it also involves poor reliability and extremely high costs. The regime in Ethiopia windbags day and night about a pie-in-the-sky dam on the Nile. They say it will be the largest dam in Africa and cost USD$6-7 billion. This fantasy dam is supposed to resolve the power supply problems of not only Ethiopia but also the region and beyond. The fact of the matter is that the regime aims to export much of the power produced from the dam and not use it for domestic power self-sufficiency. It is also ironic that the regime seeks to convince the population and the world that it can run the “largest dam” in Africa when it cannot even manage efficiently the few dams that are currently in existence.  Yet the regime in Ethiopia keeps on windbagging the Nile dam canard to create the grand illusion of development, hoodwink the population and panhandle China and the international banks for more and more handouts.

The World Bank says Africa needs USD$43 billion annually to improve its power infrastructure. Would dropping USD$7 billion in American tax dollars plus $9 billion from the private sector over five years to “double” the power capacity make a  difference in lighting Africa or enlightening Africans? Throwing USD$3 billion a year to help “Power Africa” for 5 years sounds like chicken feed. According to IMANI, the Ghanaian Center for Policy and Education, “If all the electricity generated in Africa was shared equally, each household would have enough to power a normal light-bulb for about 3.5 hours a day per person. With President Obama’s new initiative, this can increase by roughly 18 more minutes if implementation was perfect.”

President Obama cannot power Africa by empowering Africa’s strongmen.  To power Africa, he must first help empower Africa’s youth. He cannot empower Africa’s youth with promises and silky words. He cannot power Africa by empowering a few of Africa’s “best and brightest” by  providing them leadership training or skills. It is said that more than 600 million of Africa’s one billion population is below the age of 25. The vast majority of these youth are poor, undereducated and with little prospect for lifetime economic viability. Vast numbers of these youths are forced to work in whatever capacity to help their families survive while losing educational opportunities that could free them from poverty. He must come up with a different plan for Africa’s not-so-promising youth. They are the majority of Africa!

The real answer to Africa’s problems lies in creating a power grid among its youth. Any program that is narrowly targeted to Africa’s talented youth will merely perpetuate existing inequalities and keep the sons and daughters of the rich and privileged at the top. The masses of youths at the bottom will not accept this condition. Sooner or later, they will rise, power up and disempower the strongmen who abuse their power.  That’s how Africa will be powered and empowered, President Obama!

Professor Alemayehu G. Mariam teaches political science at California State University, San Bernardino and is a practicing defense lawyer.

Previous commentaries by the author are available at:

http://open.salon.com/blog/almariam/

www.huffingtonpost.com/alemayehu-g-mariam/

Amharic translations of recent commentaries by the author may be found at:

http://www.ecadforum.com/Amharic/archives/category/al-mariam-amharic

http://ethioforum.org/?cat=24