Skip to content

A historical explanation as to why members and supporters of TPLF are ethnocentric

By Fikre Tolossa

In these days of ethnic madness, many Ethiopians consider Tigreans to be self-centered, and even tribalistic. “Where is the Tigrean sense of Ethiopian nationalism?” they ask. If they are not Ethiopians, who is? I hesitate to make such a gross generalization about all Tigreans since I haven’t been in Tigray lately to survey their true feelings towards Ethiopia. I would hate to speculate about their national integrity. However, from what I have seen, read and heard about the members and supporters of the TPLF who live outside Tigray in the rest of Ethiopia and in the West, I have come to realize that they display a terrific ethnocentric behavior.

The supporters of the TPLF and those Tigreans now in power in Ethiopia, including Ato Meles Zenawi, have implied time and again that they are Tigreans, first and foremost, and then Ethiopians. In other words, they have suggested that their Ethiopianess comes second to their Tigreaness. Contrary to this, many Amharas, for instance, consider themselves Ethiopians, first and foremost, and then Amahras, thus demonstrating their great feelings of Ethiopian nationalism and patriotism.

Running briefly through the pages of Ethiopian history, let us analyze why the members and supporters of TPLF incline to be more ethnocentric and less nationalistic than the Amharas.

There are two reasons why the Amhara in general appear to be more nationalistic than the Tigreans. First, the Amharas are more heterogenious compared with the Tigreans because of their geographical locations and the fact that they have intermingled with non-Amhara peoples such as the Oromo. Second, they have had access to state power for the past 700 years, and because of that they had to bear the responsibility of playing a leading role in preserving the Ethiopian Tewahedo Church and the territorial integrity of Ethiopia during those years. The opposite holds true for Tigreans during the past 700 years except the second half of the last Century (1872-89) when a Tigrean emperor, Atse Yohannes IV, ruled Ethiopia.

Let us briefly examine the backgrounds of the members of the TPLF and their Tigrean supporters by having a glimpse of the history of the Tigre, and compare it with that of the Amhara. Of course, when we say let us examine the history of the Tigre or even that of the Amhara, we, in reality, mean to say, the history of the ruling classes of both peoples, since these classes were the ones which decided the fate of the two peoples and the course their history took for the past 3000 years. The most important leaders of the TPLF who are now deciding the course which Ethiopian history is taking are from the Tigray ruling class whose fathers and grand fathers, as well as some of their family members, bore feudal titles ranging from Kegnazmatch to Dedjazmatch. And as such, the major cause of their hostility towards the Amhara is nothing but sheer power struggle, for they consider the Amhara to be their political rival. The common people of Tigray and even the masses of the TPLF fighters have nothing to do with this hostility.

The history of Tigray has its roots deep down in the Aksumite Civilization and beyond. It is impossible to talk of the history of Tigray without tracing it back to the Aksumite and the pre-Aksumite civilizations.

The history of Aksum has been documented in monuments, coins, artifacts, paintings, inscriptions, books and oral literature. According to these sources, the regions known today as Tigray and Eritrea and even beyond them, were identified as Pount about 5000 years ago. The people of Pount traded with the ancient Egyptians in spices, myrrh, incense, ivory, gold and other minerals, medicinal herbs, hides and various kind of woods, as well as domestic and wild animals.

History has recorded the existence of a strong state in North East Ethiopia between 500 and 100 B.C. preceding the Aksumite civilization. It was identified as the Empire of Daamatt. The people of Daamatt had their own unique alphabet and were architects and sculptors. Some of their statues and monuments have survived to our day. One of their famous statues, a lady sitting on a chair, was discovered in Tigray. Though it is 2500 years old, it is still intact. One of their leaders, King Lemene, in one of his inscriptions which has reached our age, states that he was the king of the Daamatt, Saba, Aberra, and the red and the black. The Daamatt Empire had commercial, cultural, religious and linguistic relationships with Arabia across the Red Sea.

Aksumite leaders who ruled in the early Christian era followed in the footsteps of their Daamatt predecessors and continued to expand the Empire. Among the powerful kings of Aksum in the Christian Era was Zoscales. According to a book entitled, The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea, written by a Greek traveller in the Second Century A.D., a young and wise leader by the name of Zoscales was ruling Aksum when he visited that magnificent City. Zoscales spoke Greek and controlled the international commercial transactions which took place in his seaport of Adulis. Zoscales had a close relationship with the then powerful states such as Egypt, Greece and Rome. He extended his territory as far as near Port Sudan and the Aden Peninsula. Aksum attained international respect and recognition during the reign of Zoscales.

The successors of Zoscales colonized Arabia and stretched out as far as Nubia and Egypt. However, within Ethiopia itself, they went southward and occupied only a few territories such as the ones inhabited by the Agew, Agame and Gambela peoples. The colonization of Arabia enabled Aksum to compete in international commerce with the superpowers of the day, such as the Turks, Romans, Greeks and Persians.

The towering figure among Aksumite emperors in the 4th Century A.D. was Ezana. In fact, he is one of the greatest Aksumite emperors. He was himself converted to Christianity first, and then made Christianity the official religion of his Empire, even though Christianity had been practised by Aksumites since the First Century A.D. By so doing, he laid the corner-stone for the development of Ethiopian Christian inspired theology, literature, arts, culture, architecture, history, law and music. Ezana loved to record history. He documented his valor and the affairs of his days and the history of his time on coins and in three languages: Greek, Sabean and Geez. He established a close relationship with the Coptic Church of Alexandria and enabled Ethiopia to obtain patriarchs from there up until the last century for about 1500 years. He expanded the territory of his empire beyond the Red Sea, and to some extent, within inland Ethiopia. The Geez alphabet and literature began to achieve a new dimension during his reign.

Aksum continued to be a profoundly Christian city even after the death of Ezana, so that it attracted foreign missionaries to come and convert the “pagans” outside Aksum. Towards the end of the Fifth Century, a group of nine saints from the different parts of the then Roman Empire including Constantinople, Antioch, Rome and Asia Minor headed for Aksum. Emperor Ella Amida II, who was the grandfather of Caleb, was delighted to have them around. The people of Aksum, too, welcomed them. The nine saints went, boldly risking their lives, into the remotest parts of the Aksumite Empire and fought against “paganism” by preaching the Gospel. Their spiritual activity is supposed to have lasted through the reigns of four emperors, such as Ella-Amida, Tazena, Caleb and even through that of Atse Gebre Meskal. Besides evangelizing Ethiopia, the nine saints were also engaged in the development of theology and in literary activities such as the completion of the translation of the Holy Bible into Geez which had started in the early 5th century A.D. The life history of the nine monks (Gedle) written by Ethiopian biographers by itself became a source of Ethiopian literature. Moreover, the canonization of the nine monks as saints by the Ethiopian Tewahedo Church has deeply affected the spiritual life of all Christian Tigreans and other Ethiopians to this day, since these saints are commemorated in Tigray and the rest of Ethiopia every October, June, March, November, December and January.

Kaleb, the son of Ezana, expanded and consolidated his father’s empire in both Arabia and Ethiopia. In addition, he extended his own territory upto Yemen. He made an expedition to Southern Arabia to subdue a rebellious prince and to restore his colony, besides rebuilding churches and towns. Later, an Aksumite soldier by the name of Abreha became the king of Arabia including Yemen, after murdering the new appointee of the Aksumite Emperor. The Emperor forgave him and approved of his kingship. Abreha colonized almost all of Arabia on behalf of his Emperor, built his capital at San’a, constructed marvellous churches, expanded commerce and attempted to invade Mecca and destroy its Ka’ba to stop the people from worshipping idles before the rise of the Prophet Mohammed. After Abreha’s death, his son failed to rule Arabia as effectively as his father. Eventually, assisted by the Persians, who were Ethiopia’s commercial rivals, the indigenous Arabs were able to free themselves from the domination of the Aksumites.

Kaleb’s son, Gebre-Meskel (534-548) A.D., was as great a leader as his pious father. He held his father’s territory tightly as soon as he ascended to the throne. Moreover, he devoted his time to supporting and building churches such as the Debre-Damo and St. Mary of Zion. He is also supposed to have supervised the construction of the Zur Amba Church in Gaynt, Begemedir. He befriended with St. Yared, the greatest poet-composer of Ethiopia, and appointed him to be his “minister of culture.” The respect and support of a great emperor as Gebre-Meskel helped Yared to compose such great lyrics, hymns and melodies that still thrill the souls of Ethiopians of the Tewahedo denomination. His verses became a model for Geez poetry. Yared and Gebre-Meskel introduced the celebration of Hosanna in imitation of Jesus’ return to Jerusalem riding a donkey. The tradition is still observed in Northern Ethiopia. It was Gebre-Meskel who initiated the crowning of an Emperor in a church. It seems that Gebre-Meskel’s contribution to Aksumite Civilization is more of spiritual than material.

In spite of the fact that Aksum lost Arabia at the end of the 6th Century, its influence on its former colony was remarkable. Those Ethiopians who survived in Arabia continued to participate in the military, political and cultural activities of Mecca. Their impact upon navigation was particularly significant. Many of the Arabic vocabularies which had to do with ships and navigation were of Geez origin. On top of that, Aksum continued to dominate the religious life of Arabia in the early 7th Century when the Prophet Muhammed was yet a young man in Mecca. He had the opportunity to hear both the Torah and the Gospel read aloud and discussed in public by the Ethiopian priests with whom he was a friend. Their impact on him has been evidenced by his knowledge of the Bible and his use of numerous Geez vocabularies in the Koran. His connection with Ethiopia, however, was deeper than that. His nurse when he was a baby was an Ethiopian lady. It was to Ethiopia he sent his followers and relatives to find safe-haven with the Aksumite Emperor when they were persecuted in Arabia at a time when Islam was at its infancy. A significant number of Ethiopians was present among the Prophet’s soldiers and entourage.

In addition to Arabia, the Aksumites went as far as Nubia (Sudan) to help the Christian churches there in many ways until the rise of Islam. In the long run, the rise of Islam proved to be an obstacle to Aksum’s spiritual and material progress. Aksum was cut off from Arabia and Christian Europe so that its cultural, spiritual, economic and political developments were thwarted for nearly a thousand years when “the Ethiopians slept forgetful of the world by whom they were forgotten,” as Edward Gibbon put it rightly.

In the 10th Century, the advent of Islam, the lack of a patriarch from Alexandria without which the Ethiopian Emperor and Church were powerless, and the rise to power of a female Jewish (Felasha) warrior named Yodit (Gudit), caused the downfall of the Aksumite Empire. Yodit destroyed many monuments, castles and churches including the illustrious cathedral of Aksum, St. Mary of Zion. She burned countless books of immense value. She persecuted Del Ne’ad, the last Aksumite Emperor of the Solomonic Dynasty and reigned over Aksum for 40 years. When she died, Dil Ne’ad, who had been in exile in Menz, Shewa, restored his Dynasty. He was overthrown again probably around 1030 A.D. by his Agew servant Mera Tekle-Haimanot who claimed connection with the Solomonic Dynasty and established the Zagwe Dynasty.

With the ascension to the throne of Mera Tekle-Haimanot, the link of the chain of the Solomonic Dynasty was broken. The capital city, Aksum, was also replaced by Lasta in Wello, thus moving away the spiritual, political, economic and cultural nerve center of the Aksumites. This way the glorious Aksum lost its significance as one of the cradles of Ethiopian civilization. After the decline of Aksum up until 1974 for about 1100 years, Tigray was first ruled by the Agew, later by the Amhara, Oromo and a few Tigre governor generals who were appointed by the Amhara emperors excluding the time (seventeen years) when the Tigrean Emperor Yohannes IV reigned over the entire Ethiopia.

The Agew are one of the indigenous inhabitants of Ethiopia. They were there and even took part when the Aksumite Civilization was in the making. However, they never had a chance to rule Ethiopia directly until about the 11th Century when they established the Zagwe Dynasty. The greatest leader among them was Emperor Lalibela. It was during his reign that the Amhara started to play a leading role in Ethiopian history. To seize power, when Lalibela waged war against his brother Harbe’ who was supported by the majority of the Agew, the Amhara fought along Lalibela’s side. As a reward for this service, he distanced himself from the Agew and promoted the Amhara to high ranks in his government. As the high ranking officials and soldiers of Lalibela’s government, the Amhara became prominent in Wadla & Delanta, Begemedir, Saint and Weleka. From this time on, the Amhara appeared in the scene to play a vital role in Ethiopian history for more than seven hundred years.

According to Aleka Desta Tekle-Wold, the word Amara or Amhara means people who are free. According to Aleka Taye and Aleka Asme-Giorgis, the Amhara are the descendants of Ethyiopis, one of the settlers of North East Africa, whose name probably Ethiopia bears. Unlike the Tigre, there was no one particular place or defined territory in which the Amhara lived. Nevertheless, it was observed that by the 13th Century, they had settled in Gonder, Gojam, Shewa, Wadla & Delanta, Lasta, Saynt, Meket and Shadaho. The Amhara were as much Christian as the Tigre. Gradually, the word Amhara and Christian became so synonymous that when a non-Amhara was converted to Christianity, it was said of him that he became an Amhara. It has been reported that Emperor Lalibela used the technical know-how of the Amhara to build one of the wonders of the world, the rock-hewn churches of Roha.

The Amhara probably spoke Geez before they created Amharic during the reign of Lalibela out of a mixture of Tigrigna, Arabic and Hebrew, in order to convey across a secret message. Later, when the Amhara mixed with the Oromo, Amharic enriched itself with Oromo syntax, vocabularies and idiomatic expressions. For this reason and as a result of the subtlety of the Amharic language, Aleka Asme-Giorgis asserts that even the Amhara of Gonder and Gojam, let alone of Shewa, would not communicate easily with each other. Gradually, during the reign of Yekuno Amlak, Amharic spread like wild-fire and non-Amhara peoples all over Ethiopia began to speak it. Consequently, they were considered to be Amhara, even as the non-Amhara converts to Christianity were seen as Amhara.

Despite the fact that Emperor Lalibela of the Zagwe Dynasty raised the Amhara to higher ranks and inspite of the fact that he granted them land and tenants, their hearts were yearning for the restoration of the Solomonic Dynasty. This they were able to realize through the help of a famous Amhara monk, Aba Tekle-Haimanot of Bulga, who plotted against Ne’akuto Le’ab, the last Zagwe Emperor, partly because of the promise which the claimant of the Solomonic Dynasty, Yekuno Amlak, made to him to grant the church a third of his Empire if he would help him to dethrone Ne’akuto Le’ab. (Ironically, Yekuno Amlak was in the service of Ne’akuto Le’ab, the last Zagwe Emperor, even as Mera Tekle-Haimanot was in the service of Dil Ne’ad, the last Emperor of the so-called Solomonic Dynasty whom he had managed to overthrow). Moreover, the Patriarch, representing the Church would sit next to the Emperor’s throne at public ceremonies and the Akabe Se’at would control the affairs of the Church in relation to the State. In other words, the Church would have an immense wealth and power in the land. As a result, Christianity, the Emperor and the motherland became synonymous for the Amhara upon Yekuno Amlak’s ascension to the throne. This interrelationship lasted up until 1974 when the Derg separated State and Church after the overthrow of Emperor Haile-Selassie I, who claimed to be the descendant of Yekuno Amlak.

Abune Tekle-Haimanot, supported by the Ethiopian clergy including Aba Iyesus Moa of the Haik Monastery, Aba Yohannes of Debre Damo, and even the Nebure’ed of Aksum as well as the Patriarch of Ethiopia, Abune Kerlos, convinced the pious and God-fearing last Emperor of the Zagwe Dynasty who revered Abune Tekle-Haimanot immensely, that his dynasty was illegal, that he should hand over power without bloodshed to Yekuno Amlak, the “rightful” heir to the throne. After a series of negotiations Ne’akuto Le’ab, whom you can consider either naive or a great man of God, agreed to let Yekuno Amlak sit in the Ethiopian throne upon his death providing the descendants of the Zagwe Dynasty are given due respect and homage as long as the descendants of the Solomonic Dynasty reigned. This way the Amhara throned an Emperor of their choice claiming that he was one of the descendants of the last Aksumite Emperor, Del Ne’ad.

In reality, however, three hundred years had elapsed ever since Del Ne’ad was overthrown. Therefore, the integrity of the lineage was debatable. To legitimize Yekuno Amlak’s Solomonic lineage, he and the Amhara had the Kebre-Negest composed. The Kebre-Negest narrates how, about 1000 B.C., Queen Maqda of Ethiopia traveled to Jerusalem to hear the wisdom of King Solomon by whom she was impregnated to give birth to a son, Menelik, who became the first Ethiopian Emperor of the Solomonic Dynasty. Numerous Aksumite emperors claimed descent from him. Among the Amhara, Haile Selassie claimed to be the 225th Emperor of this Dynasty. The whole story of King Solomon and Queen Maqda is a legend. If he had indeed impregnated her, since King Solomon, who was the greatest womanizer of all time with over 900 concubines, without counting his wives, the fact that he impregnated a dignified Ethiopian Queen who was his guest was not something to be proud of. However, because of the greatness of Solomon and because of Ethiopia’s attachment to Judaism and Christianity, the legend was accepted positively. Consequently, it helped Yekuno Amlak and his descendants to rule Ethiopia for 700 years.

Yekuno Amlak is supposed to be the 9th descendant of Del Ne’ad the Tigrean. If this was true, then the Amhara who had no ethnic relationship with him contrary to the Tigreans, used Yekuno Amlak by whom they were used mutually to seize power. If Yekuno Amlak was indeed the descendant of the last Aksumite Emperor, and as such a Tigrean, then all those emperors who succeeded him and reigned in Gonder and Shoa including Fasiledes, Menelik and Haile Selassie, were all of Tigrean and not of Amhara descent. In that case, the allegation that it was Amhara emperors who sat upon the Ethiopian throne for the past 700 years has no foundation. In the final analysis, it doesn’t matter whether Yekuno Amlak and his descendants were Tigreans or Amharas who usurped the Solomonic Dynasty like the Zagwe emperors. The fact is that they ruled Ethiopia for 700 years supported by the Amhara and the Ethiopian Tewahedo Church. This Church, though Aksumite in origin, empowered itself during the Shoan era, and became for the Amhara the foundation of their monarchy, history, arts, and culture and the source of their inspiration and courage. The Amhara thought that if their Church was threatened their livelihood was at stake. The Tewahedo Church indeed enabled the Amhara, at least nominally, to have an access to the power which the Tigreans had lost about 1100 years ago.

Since Yekuno Amlak was born among the Amhara, even assuming that he was not an Amhara, there is no doubt that he spoke Amharic as his mother-tongue. As a matter of fact, it was during his reign that Amharic began spreading fast throughout the Ethiopian Empire. He made Tegulet (Debre-Berhan) in Shoa his Capital city. Nevertheless, he didn’t stay there all the time. He roamed about the empire to consolidate his power and to build his nation, a tradition which almost all Ethiopian emperors followed.
Contrary to the Aksumite emperors, who made their presence felt mainly in the North and across the Red Sea, Yekuno Amlak and his descendants expanded South, West and East within Ethiopia. Yekuno Amlak, Amde-Tsion (r. 1314-1344), Dawit I (r. 138O-1412), Zera Yacob (r. 1434-1468), Be’ede Mariam (r. 1468-1478), Naod (r. 1494-15O8), Lebene Dengil (r. 15O8-154O), Gelawdewos (r. 154O-1559), Sertse Dengel (r. 1563-1597), Susenyos (r. 16O7-1632), Fasilidas (r. 1632-1667), Yohannes I (r. 1667-1682), Iyasu I (r. 1682-17O6), Bekaffa (r. 1721-173O), Iyassu II (r. 173O-1755), Iyoas (r. 1755-1769), Menelik II (r.1889-19O9) and Haile Selassie (r.193O-1974), all these emperors defended the territorial integrity of their country against foreign powers, upheld Christianity strongly and withstood the forces which used Islam as a pretext to wage war and seize power. They also intermingled with the Oromo and shared with them blood and culture, after a long fight with them.

The Aksumites, in their heydays, crossed the Red Sea, seized Arabia, colonized it and converted their subjects to Christianity. In other words, they were the ones who were aggressive. The Amhara, because of the historical time they were in power, i.e., after the rise of Islam and during the age of imperialism, had to be defensive for the most part. However, it doesn’t mean that they didn’t invade and occupy foreign countries. As a matter of fact, they raided Nubia (Sudan) from time to time. According to his Gedl, Atse Fasil (1632-1667) colonized Nubia and a part of Egypt successfully. Besides trying to expand Ethiopia’s territory, the Amhara played a leading role in defending the territorial integrity of Ethiopia from foreign aggressors.

The Turks were the first foreign aggressors towards the end of the 16th Century who had an immense ambition to colonize eastern and northern Ethiopia, control Ethiopia’s commerce and communication with the outside world, and impose their religion upon her. This they attempted to exercise first by using Muslims of Yifat, as well as Somali and Afar Ethiopians. Gragn Muhammed and his successors were instrumental for the Turks to weaken Christian Ethiopian emperors. The Turks were then one of the super powers of the day.

Besides occupying the coast of Eritrea and the Red Sea islands of Ethiopia such as Harkiko, they even came as far as Tigray to wage war against Ethiopia. One of the Amhara emperors who fought the Turks ferociously was Atse Sertse Dengel. In 1588-89 he mobilized a large army and waged a decisive war against them in Tigray and what is now called Eritrea. He managed to wipe them out of Eritrea and Tigray liberating Massawa and Debarua. They escaped to the sea and either hid in the island of Arkiko or fought back with canons mounted on their naval fleets from the Red Sea. Since Ethiopia’s great navy had ceased to exist with the decline of the Aksumite Empire, Sertse Dengel could not pursue them with ships. As a result, he kept his troops at the coast of the sea for a while and due to scorching sun and lack of provisions, he retreated inland lest his solders die from dehydration and starvation. The Turks returned and seized the Red Sea coast including Massawa and Debarua. Later, another emperor, Atse Fasil, realizing the futility of fighting with them, chose diplomacy and made a pact accepting to live with them. History repeated itself in time of Menelik II. Atse Sertse Dengel’s defeat of the Turks and Atse Fasil’s pact with them is amazingly similar to Menelik’s defeat of the Italian imperialists 308 years later at the Battle of Adwa. Emperor Menelik, too, had to make a pact with the Italians who were in Eritrea and return to his Capital lest his soldiers die from drought and starvation if he were to pursue the Italians any further to the sea. In any case, in 1896 and 1936, the role of leadership in defending Ethiopia twice from European imperialism during the scramble for Africa and the rise of fascism, was played once again by the Amhara and Amhara emperors, Atse Menelik and Atse Haile Selassie, who mobilized the various ethnic groups to resist the aggression.

The reason why the Amhara and their emperors played a leading role in defending Ethiopia was not that they loved Ethiopia more than the Tigreans or other ethnic groups. It was because they happened to rule Ethiopia when her independence was at stake. The Tigreans and Emperor Yohannes IV, too, had fought the Italian and Mahdist aggressors on several occasions when the Tigreans once again were ruling Ethiopia albeit briefly. In fact, it was while fighting against the Mahdists that Atse Yohannes lost his life. The time in which the Tigreans once again ruled Ethiopia after they lost power for about 1100 years were too short (seventeen years, 1872-89) to create in them a strong feeling of nationalism for the entire Ethiopia. Moreover, in contrast to the Amhara who went to Tigray several times from southern, central and western Ethiopia to liberate Tigray including Eritrea from the Turks and Italians, the Tigreans were fighting against the foreign invaders only within Tigray proper (except Metema where Yohannes IV died to avenge the Mahdists for raiding Gonder) to liberate their own land. The fact that the Amhara were defending Tigray and the rest of Ethiopia for 700 years helped them to develop a strong sense of Ethiopian nationalism.

Before the rise of Islam, the Afar and the Somali peoples were first under the sovereignty of the Aksumites, and later under those of the Zagwe emperors to whom they paid tribute. With the rise of Islam, however, Aksum began to decline and these Ethiopians were converted to Islam. Later, during the reign of Yekuno Amlak and his descendants, supported by the Arabs and the Turks, they rebelled against their Christian sovereigns who ruled them from Shoa. They defied their authority and waged Jihad wars against Shoan emperors such as Amde-Tsion, Seife-Ar’ed, Dawit, Zere-Yacob, Be’de-Mariam, Lebene-Dengel and Gelawdewos. Though there were other Ethiopian Muslim leaders (for instance, the Sultans of Yifat such as Sabredin, Kadi Selehi, Hakadin and Se’adadin) who had waged unsuccessful Islamic wars against the Shoan emperors, Ahmed Gragn, who was based in Harer, was able to defeat them and rule a good part of Ethiopia for about 16 years, until he was killed by a Portuguese soldier in a battle in 1543. Ahmed Gragn’s nephew, Nur Ahmed, avenged his uncle later by killing Emperor Gelawdewos in 1560. After that, the Amhara emperors didn’t resume fighting against their Afari and Somali countrymen until 1577 when Sultan Mohamed IV rose against Emperor Sertse-Dengel in a battle at the Wabi Shebele region. He lost this battle and his life. To temper the aggression of the Afar, the Shoan Emperors sought marriage with the daughters of the Afar chieftains. This strategy helped them to some extent.

In 1887, Emperor Menelik II established a total dominion over Harer and ended the emirate and sultanate once and for all. The fact that the Amhara were ruling Ethiopia until the rise of Emperor Yohannes IV, who empowered the Tigreans once again, made them historically responsible to defend Ethiopia and to play a leading role in her expansion and unity. This situation stirred in them a strong national feeling as well as unbreakable bond to and an identity with Ethiopia for whose sake they shed their blood willingly.

Whereas the expansion of the Aksumites within Ethiopia was very limited, the Amhara, basing themselves in Gonder and Shoa, stretched to the peripheries in their nation-building endeavor in which they succeeded to bring together Ethiopia under their sovereignty, so that when the Derg collapsed in 1991, the TPLF and EPLF were able to inherit the present large territory of Ethiopia including Eritrea. Of course, there were two non-Amhara emperors who have also contributed to the expansion and unity of Ethiopia, namely, Atse Tewodros of Quara and Atse Yohannes of Tigre. Even though these emperors were not Amhara, they followed in the footsteps of Amhara emperors linking themselves to the Solomonic Dynasty and maintaining the status quo which the Amhara had established.

The Amhara were not lucky enough to live in peace. Shortly after the Islamic wars were over, they engaged in a war with their other countrymen, the Oromo, who had started expanding into their territories in the 1520s when the Amhara were busy with their Muslim brothers. Compared with the Tigre, the Amhara lived in the most fertile regions of Ethiopia. Initially, the different Oromo tribes fought the Amhara wherever they happened to be, looking for ideal grazing lands for their cattle. Tigray being arid, the Oromo were not interested in it. So, they looked at it from afar and ignored it. After the Amhara moved their capital city from Shoa to Gonder in order to be less accessible to the Muslim invaders, the Oromo had engaged in many battles with the Amhara in Gonder and Gojam. In one of such battles, a little “Amhara” prince by the name of Susenyos was captured by the Oromo and was adopted by one of them. He learned the Oromo language and grew up in accordance with the Oromo culture. After he lived six years with them, he reunited with his royal family in Gonder. Upon the death of his father his power rivals chased him out of Gonder. He found refuge among his former Oromo friends and persuaded them to follow him claiming that he was their king. Indeed, they accepted him as their leader and fought for him in Shoa and other parts of central Ethiopia where he emerged victorious. Gradually, he marched with them to Gonder and seized power and became emperor. He filled the court with his Oromo friends and soldiers and spent most of his leisure time with them ignoring the Amhara. He appointed them to higher posts in his empire. Whenever the Amhara of Gojam and Gonder rebelled against him, he sent the ferocious Oromo fighters whom he allowed to rule over the rebellious Amhara as governors and landlords. This way the Oromo rooted themselves in Amhara territories consolidating their power and exerting their influence upon the Amhara. Their presence and influence were felt more in Gonder when Emperor Iyasu II married an Oromo lady by the name of Wabi and begot Iyoas. Later, Wabi appointed her Oromo brothers and relatives to higher positions in the empire, and her son, Emperor Iyoas, favored them more than the Gonder Amhara. Elsewhere in Shoa, Wello, Meket and Shadaho, the Amhara got tired of fighting with the Oromo and intermingled with them through marriage and Oromo adoption systems known as Mogassa and Gudifecha.

Eventually, the Amhara and the Oromo, besides mixing blood, influenced each other’s language, religion, culture, arts and crafts, warfare and horsemanship to mention just a few. This mixing of blood and culture resulted in creating great emperors, kings and empresses of Oromo descent such as Iyoas, Tekle-Haimanot of Gojam, Menelik II, Haile Selassie I, Itege Tewabech, Itege Taitu Betul and Itege Mennen, even without mentioning the myriads of Oromo princes, Rasses and Dedjazmatches. This phenomenon coupled with the fact that the Amhara were more or less dispersed all over the length and breadth of Ethiopia, expanded their world-outlook and sense of belonging to the entire Ethiopia. Instead of being locked within their own ethnic shell, they broke out of it and achieved universality. Instead of feeling being only Amhara, they considered themselves, first and foremost, Ethiopians. Further more, the fact that the Amhara were dispersed in different provinces mixed with various ethnic groups by whose languages, religions, culture and psychological makeups they were influenced, each Amhara group, depending on its location, evolved as a unique entity with its own characteristic features, which to a degree distinguish it from the others. In other words, it lacked homogeneity to be so ethnic-minded. Particularly the Shoan Amhara which both the TPLF and EPLF resent extremely, formed an independent state with its own unique political, economic, cultural and social system unlike that of the Gonder and Gojam Amhara, when they refused to pay tribute to the Gonder Amhara in 1738. Atse Iyasu Adiam-Seged, who was then the Emperor of Ethiopia, sent his army to subdue the Shoan Amhara, who, led by Mered Azmatch Abiye, won the battle, thus cutting off Shoa from Gonder for about 125 years until Emperor Tewodros II captured young Menelik upon the death of his father King Haile-Melekot in 1863. This lack of homogeneity among the Amhara turned out to be a positive factor which helped them to evolve as Ethiopians first and foremost, and as such, to develop a strong feeling of a “wider nationalism” as opposed to narrow nationalism.

That was not the case with the Tigreans. Since the Tigreans, compared with the Amhara, were confined to their own province without mixing with the Oromo or other ethnic groups, which would imprint a lasting impact upon them for the past 1100 years, kept themselves homogenous. For this reason, their language (inspite of the fact that many of them spoke Amharic), religion, culture, psychological makeup and geographical territory (except Eritrea’s separation from it), remained predominantly the same as they were for hundreds of years. This fact made the leaders of the TPLF so ethnocentric that their most articulate members such as Meles Zenawi and his associates declared that they were Tigreans first and foremost. Hence, their lack of Ethiopian nationalism. Hence their opting to wage ethnic war against Mengistu Haile-Mariam’s regime, whereas the great majority of the Amhara youth chose to fight for all Ethiopian oppressed masses irrespective of their ethnic origin.

After the fall of Aksum, Tigre was ruled first by the Agew, later by the Amhara and Oromo emperors, regents, Dedjazmatches, Rasses or by Tigrean chieftains appointed by them. The Tigrean ruling class submitted to the Amhara emperors or the enderasses of Ethiopia (regents) whether they were Oromo or Amhara, and expressed their allegiance to them whenever they (the Tigreans) were weaker. On the other hand, when they felt that they were strong enough or oppressed too much, they defied their authority, refused to pay tribute and even fought them. One typical example of such Tigre warlords was Ras Se’ul Mikael. In 1745, when he felt that he was powerful militarily, he rebelled against Emperor Iyasu Birhan Seged, but when he realized that he couldn’t withstand him, he submitted to him. Around 1805 Ras Wolde-Selassie rebelled against the Oromo Regent of Ethiopia, Ras Gugssa. After his death, Dedjazmatch Sabagadis defied the Authority of his son, the Regent Ras Mariye. After the death of Ras Mariye, his brother, Dedjazmatch Dori became the Regent of Ethiopia. Dedjazmatch Sabagadis’ son, Dedjazmatch Kahssaye, refused to submit to Dedjazmatch Woube who was appointed by Dedjazmatch Dori.

After the death of Atse Yohannes IV, Ras Mengesha, who claimed the throne, supported by Ras Alula and Ras Hagos, did not express his allegiance to Menelik and submit to him in the beginning. It took Menelik a long time to reconcile with both Ras Mengesha and Ras Alula of Tigre.

In the days gone by, in the regions known as Tigray and Tigre, located on both sides of the Mereb River, the ruling classes used to fight each other for the sake of territories and power. For example, the ruling family of Shum Agame Woldu, the father of Dedjazmatch Sabagadis from Agame, the family of Shum Tenben Mircha, the father of Atse Yohannes IV from Tenben, the family of Ras Wolde-Selassie from Enderta and the family of Kentiba Tesfa and Zeray, Dedjazmatch Wolde-Mikael and Dedjazmatch Hailu from Hamassien, were bitter enemies who battled often for the acquisition of land and power. Nevertheless, they were all united in their opposition against and their feelings of resentment towards the Amhara, even though this or that group may have appeared to be preferred by the Amhara or seemed to favor and collaborate with the Amhara.

In the 20th Century, the Tigre ruling class persuaded by the British, stirred the peasants to rise (the Woyane Uprising) against the Shoan Amhara and Emperor Haile Selassie, after the liberation of Ethiopia from fascist Italy in 1943-44. A special force led by Ras Abebe Aregay suppressed the uprising. Taking the place of the Italians, the British had a scheme to rule both Tigray and Eritrea as one entity of Tigre-Tigrigna. To this end, they attempted to use Atse Yohannes’ close relatives such as Ras Seyum and Dedjazmatch Haile-Selassie Gugssa who had already been appointed as the Governor General of Tigre by the Italian fascists. Ras Seyum accepted the British offer to be the Governor General of Tigre, and then changed his mind when he found out that Emperor Haile-Selassie had arrived in Ethiopia from exile. The British replaced Ras Seyum with the opportunist banda Dedjazmatch Haile-Selassie Gugssa whom they promoted to Ras. The Emperor had to put immense pressure on the British government to assert his sovereignty. Despite Ras Seyum’s expression of his allegiance to Emperor Haile-Selassie, the latter was at times suspicious of the former, remembering his initial collaboration with the British. Even the young Ras Mengesha Seyum, who was then only 16 years old was implicated with being a part of the Woyane Uprising and brought to trial in Addis Abeba.

Evidently, the leaders of the TPLF sympathize with the Woyane Uprising and regret its failure since they have named their organization the Woyane Harenet Tigray. Some of the important leaders of the TPLF such as Meles Zenawi and Hayelom Araya (TPLF’s militia leader who was posthumously promoted to general), to mention only the two as an example, were from the Tigre ruling class. Ato Meles’s grandfather and Ato Hayelom’s father were Dedjazmatchs. Usually, the son of a warlord had a chance to inherit the title of his father if he was favored by the Emperor of Ethiopia. Ato Zenawi, the father of Meles, did not either serve fully under Emperor Haile Selassie, or if he did, obviously was not favored by the Shoan Emperor, since he didn’t confer upon him his father’s or any title for that matter. It is not surprising then if he disliked the Emperor Haile-Selassie, in particular, and the Amhara ruling class in general, and if he passed on this sentiment to his son. Tigrean leaders and warlords who disdained the Amhara ruling class, in particular, and the Amhara, in general, are likely to influence their children including some of the important leaders of the TPLF with their negative attitude towards this class and ethnic group. Therefore, the hatred towards the Amhara by some of the TPLF leaders is primarily subjective and vindictive. The feelings of the leaders of the TPLF towards the Ethiopian feudal system and its officials was the same as that of the progressive Amhara youth. However, their resentment of the Amhara ruling class, in particular, and that of the Amhara, in general, originates mainly from the influence of their families.

There are a few more reasons behind why Tigrean elites resent the Shoan Amhara, and all Amhara, in general. These Tigreans have a contradictory relationship with the history of Tigray. Even though because of their Marxist orientation they tend to label the history of Tigray as feudal, in essence, deep down inside, they are proud of Aksum’s glorious past. The fact that Aksum declined, that Tigreans in general lost power, that the capital of Ethiopia moved from Tigray first to Lasta, then to Shoa and Gonder and back to Shoa, that Tigray is arid, less attended and poverty-stricken pains them deeply. As mentioned previously, since it was the Shoan Amhara who throned emperors who claimed to be of the Aksumite, Solomonic Dynasty and ruled Ethiopia including Tigray for the past 700 years with the exception of the time when Ras Mikael Se’ul as the Enderasse of Ethiopia was governing Tigray and the rest of Ethiopia before the Era of Princess (Zemene Mesafent) for whose occurrence he himself was partly responsible, and the reign of Atse Yohannes IV (1872-89) during the last century, they make these Amharas as an scapegoat for the demise of Tigray. That is one reason.

Another reason why they accuse the Amhara is to consolidate their power since they are afraid of the greatness in number of the Amhara, their seasoned experience for 700 years in warfare, diplomacy, the political arena and bureaucracy. In order to withstand all of these and survive, the leaders of the TPLF have resorted to demonizing the Amhara to unite against them the other Ethiopian ethnic groups including the Oromo who are actually related to the Amhara. That was why the TPLF regime neither protected when innocent Amharas were butchered mercilessly in Harer, Arsi, Shoa and elsewhere, nor cared to bring the criminals to the court of justice.

With the exception of some individuals, the majority of Tigrean intellectuals have chosen to remain silent about the division of Ethiopia along ethnic lines and the attack on the Amhara. First of all, because of the historical reasons given above, ethnicity has always been in their blood regardless of how well they have been educated. Therefore, they feel at home with the division of Ethiopia along ethnic lines. Moreover, this scheme can weaken for them the Amhara, whom they consider to be their fiercest rivals. Most important of all, they think that the status quo is in favor of their home province which is prospering and developing rapidly at the expense of the rest of Ethiopia. Consequently, they have “ye egna lijoch nachew gid yelim yigzu” kind of attitude towards the TPLF leadership. For the opportunist Tigreans, there is no better time than this to secure power and amass wealth. So, why should they oppose the present Tigrean government which, in their opinion, is working around the clock to make up what Tigray has lost for the past 1100 years?

Even though their political system was far from being perfect, the Amhara leaders at least did not so openly campaign to promote only the interest of their own ethnic group and take total advantage of the fact that they were in power. Striving to accommodate all, they somehow shared power and wealth with the ruling classes of the other major ethnic groups including the Oromo and Tigre. The Amhara people were not treated in any special way by the ruling Amhara class. Consequently, the Amhara of Gonder, Gojam, Wello and Shoa remained as poor and as miserable as the common folks of Tigre, Harer, Sidamo, Keffa, and the other regions.

Whereas the Amhara, and particularly the Shoan and Wello Amhara, because of the vastness of their territories, their active engagement in war, politics and commerce, as well as their open-mindedness, easily intermingled and assimilated with various non-Amhara peoples of Ethiopia, whose ways of life, language and culture they inherited and by whose religion and tradition they were deeply affected, the Tigreans who lived in Tigray proper, as indicated earlier, were intact and all alone by themselves with no other non-Tigrean people settling amongst them to influence them linguistically, culturally and psychologically for at least 1100 years. True, some Tigreans found their way to other provinces such as Gonder, Wello and even as far as Shoa to seek out their fortune. However, the number of such Tigreans is insignificant in relation to the vast majority of Tigreans who have never been out of Tigray proper. In our time, though these Tigreans have been exposed to the life-style, language and culture of their “hosts,” many of them remained to be a closed society preferring often to speak their own language even in the presence of non-Tigrigna speaking friends of theirs, sticking together as much as they could. Even those who were born and raised away from Tigray and Eritrea portrayed themselves as foreign nationals with their hearts craving for Tigray and Eritrea where they have never been. Indeed, they were mightily ethnocentric. That was why they used to support financially and otherwise their own ethnic political organizations such as the TPLF and EPLF. This, of course, excludes those Tigreans and Eritreans who were broad-minded enough to join non-ethnic Ethiopian political organizations such as the student movement, the EPRP and Meison. Unfortunately, some of these Tigreans abandoned the student movement and the EPRP and joined their own ethnic fronts eventually. I know of numerous Tigreans and Eritreans who were born and raised in Addis Abeba and elsewhere in Ethiopia, who struggled in the Ethiopian student movement until they joined their own ethnic front. What is more, they waged a war against the EPRP and chased out its members from Assimba, Tigray, claiming that they were not of the Tigre ethnic group to operate there militarily.

Those who consider themselves Ethiopians first and foremost have responded bitterly to the division of Ethiopia along ethnic lines; to the way the referendum was conducted in Eritrea; to the fact that Eritrea is still the economic and political burden on Ethiopia despite her declaration of independence; to the sacking of Amharas from government institutions en mass and their replacement with Tigreans and Eritreans; to the disbanding of the Ethiopian army; and to the political and economic domination of Ethiopia by the political organization of a single ethnic group which safeguards only its own interest though it was supposed to cater to the welfare of the whole of Ethiopia. Even some Ethiopians, who in the beginning welcomed the TPLF when it seized power from the Derg regime, have now withdrawn their sympathy from and are disappointed with the TPLF Government. These Ethiopians fear that TPLF’s ethnic policy will lead to genocidal conflict like that of Ruwanda, Somalia and Bosnia and destroy Ethiopia. Ato Meles contends that his policy will stop this from happening. What he refuses to admit is that there is ethnic-cleansing albeit on small scale going on in Ethiopia, which may transform itself into a larger scale unless it is checked now. That is not all. This policy has established the political and economic domination of one ethnic group, namely the Tigre, over the rest.

I am not of the opinion that the TPLF deliberately designed its ethnic policy to annihilate Ethiopia totally. It organized itself ethnically to overthrow the Derg. Mobilizing some of the people of Tigray by exploiting their hatred for the Derg, it liberated Tigray. In the same way, it marched to Addis Abeba exploiting the hatred for the Derg by the rest of the Ethiopian people including the Amhara and the military which refused to continue the fighting. Instead of dragging Ethiopia back to an outdated form of social order after she had already achieved statehood as a result of 1000 years of struggle by visionary Ethiopian leaders, it would have been correct to only implement a policy which will secure Ethiopian unity based on equality and regional autonomy.

As things now stand, it is unlikely that the TPLF will destroy Ethiopia and return to Tigray, as numerous Ethiopians fear. The TPLF will lose its economic resource if Ethiopia is eliminated totally. It keeps Ethiopia in such a way that she is neither united to resist the TPLF nor totally fragmented to be controlled by it. That is why it suppresses any ethnic movement which seeks complete independence from its grip, though on paper, it grants such rights. In the long run, however, I don’t think it can continue to play this game effectively. The people of Ethiopia, whose level of consciousness is rising every minute, will definitely challenge it.

The reason given by Ato Meles Zenawi for the current economic, industrial, educational and cultural boom in Tigray and the absence of these elsewhere in Ethiopia is that the Tigreans are working harder under a peaceful circumstance, whereas the other ethnic groups of Ethiopia are fighting each other instead of using their energy in constructing their respective killils. What Ato Meles has lost sight of is the fact that it is his administration which has created such a hostile atmosphere which encourages ethnic clashes. On top of that, the TPLF doesn’t allocate as much funds to the other regions as it does to Tigray. Ato Meles’s assertion that Tigray is not the most favored killil of his government is far from the truth. There is no doubt that, under the pretext of reconstructing war-torn Tigray, the TPLF is pumping into the region money donated and borrowed in Ethiopia’s name. I have no objection if Tigray makes economic, educational and cultural progress as long as the downtrodden people of Tigray can benefit from it. In fact, I will be delighted about it as I deem the downtrodden Tigreans as my own people. Nevertheless, I want to see the same progress in Gojam, Gonder, Illubabur, Keffa, Bale, Sidamo Harer, and the other regions of Ethiopia. As long as these forgotten Ethiopian provinces do not get the same attention as Tigray, then the TPLF is indeed out there to plunder Ethiopia. I don’t think Ethiopians will tolerate this sort of injustice for a long time.

Will the people of Tigray get anything out of TPLF’s undertakings? I doubt that they will. Since almost all of the industries are owned by a few TPLF officials and supporters, it is this group of the “new rich” which will have the lions share of it, and not the Tigray people.

Some enraged Ethiopians accuse all the peoples of Tigray to be the supporters and collaborators of the TPLF. They also assume that since the TPLF had an army of about 100,000 Tigreans, by proportion, all Tigreans must be its supporters. The Derg too, had about 500,000 soldiers and militiamen. Does it mean that the Derg was supported by all Ethiopians just because it had a large army? Of course not! It was the Derg itself which created all the forces which united against it. When the EPRP was waging guerrilla warfare against the Derg in Assimba, Tigray, before the formation of the TPLF, or when it was yet in its infancy, many Tigre peasants embraced the EPRP. After the EPRP was forced to leave Assimba due to TPLF pressure, however, the people had no choice but to side with the TPLF since it was the only group operating in Tigray against the tyranny of the Derg. That was it. The only way any government can gain the total support of its people is by winning their hearts. Even if the people of Tigray were to profit from all the projects launched by the TPLF, it wouldn’t be that easy for the TPLF to win their hearts by buying them out with material luxuries. Individuals who have travelled to Tigray and Addis Abeba witness that there is more freedom in Addis Abeba than in Tigray. How could then the TPLF win the hearts and total support of the Tigray people as some of us think?

For any political entity to succeed in Tigray without resorting to violence, it should base its philosophy and cultural policy on the historical, traditional and spiritual foundation of the Tigray people. This holds true to the TPLF and even to Tigrean Alliance for National Democracy (TAND), which is opposed to government of Meles Zenawi; for neither of these political organizations could deeply root itself and last long without taking into consideration the cherished values of the Tigray people.

So far, I attempted to explain why the members of the TPLF and its Tigrean supporters are ethnocentric. Pertaining the Tigre people who now live in Tigray, as I pointed out in the beginning, one cannot know for sure their exact feelings towards the TPLF and the rest of Ethiopia, since they haven’t yet been granted the opportunity to articulate their true feelings. Theoretically speaking, however, most of them can’t be the supporters of the TPLF, since the TPLF doesn’t have much regard for their religion, history and culture which it negates as being feudal and backward, regardless of the fact that it is working round the clock to industrialize Tigray.

Upto the present time, the Amhara have voiced their sad condition through the All Amhara People’s Organization. This Organization was necessary in the beginning in exposing the atrocities committed against the Amhara. Now, however, in the best tradition of the Amhara, it should transform qualitatively and call itself, All Ethiopian People’s Organization, and champion Ethiopian nationalism and unity by uniting with all Ethiopian ethnic groups including the Tigre, which genuinely believe in Ethiopian unity based on equality. By so doing, it will win the support of the other ethnic groups to protect its members more effectively and to realize Ethiopian unity based on equality and mutual respect, for whose attainment the Amhara have shed their blood the past 700 years. Otherwise, it will contribute indirectly to the ethnic division of Ethiopia against which it has struggled upto now.

32 thoughts on “A historical explanation as to why members and supporters of TPLF are ethnocentric

  1. It is a good writing but it seems that the writer do not want to confirm that the axumite empire was run by the Amharas and Amharic had been used by the royalty and the army. The fact is the Amharas are the true owners of the Solomonic Dynasty. When the axumite empire declined the Amharas moved from their city/axume and settled in the central highlands of Ethiopia and united Ethiopia.

    Thank you Fikre Tolossa. I would like to tell you that I very much enjoy reading your articles.

    Iwunetu Wogasso

  2. it is rightly written and asserted.I disscussed so many times on the such well articulated issues on etnicity and ethiopianisim, with some close families and ordinary soldiers of the current regieme. Deep down inside , theier heart is full of haterd ideas.And at the same time they are worried of the other ethiopians because they know that sooner or latter the current system will be dismanteld and remmberd as infamous davil spirit tried ti impose on peace loving Ethiopians.Even they are not left with any convincing and logical ideas to argue and defend the ethino based woyane regime

  3. What a visionary writer & historian Dr. Fikre Tollosa!

    Kudos man, it is like eating a delicious meal at a
    time when people are getting bored of long articles.
    This one is very special like his other articles.

    Please let us read continuously your articles.

    Thank you for letting us get more clarity.


  4. Dear Dr, as usual, thank you for insightful information. It is true all of us Ethiopians argue with one another without understand the historical facts. Every ethnicity in Ethiopia claim they were oppressed without historical evidence. How much do we know of Ethiopian history and our own ethnicity. We are all need to dig our past history and evidence before claiming oppression. We can’t just take others’ agenda and claim to be true because other people have agenda and goal by spreading false or exaggerated propaganda.

    Hope you post some resources also to support this writing.

    I would like to mention that, regarding Tigray being isolated, it is almost always the responsibilities of leaders, in this case, the Amhara emperors even until Mengistu to make other regions such as Tigray more inclusive and active in taking roles for the development and advancement of the regions of Ethiopia. This I believe why resentments are originated. As we progress into the 21st century, history should teach us about involving all regions of Ethiopia towards economic, political and social progress rather than resorting to revenge.

    Thank you

  5. What an analysis!!! What an insight so deep and wide that covers more than a 1,000 years of documented history. May God Bless You and Your Family, Sir!!!

    To our son Mr. Elias and all other Ethiopia-loving expatriates!!! Please join me in honoring this gifted son of ours. He should be given an award. I call upon Mr. Elias to use his good office to establish and an award foundation where great sons like Sir Fikre will be bestowed an award for their contributions in literature, cultural and other feats. I will send a contribution toward that goal. And may be turkey award to those who did damage to the well being and unity of our people. Lets do it!!!! Please, please, please!!!!

  6. A wonderful summery of Ethiopian history. The analysis deliberates very well on the topic of the article. It indeed helped med to refresh my knowledge and memory of contemporary and past Ethiopian history. We need more of such articles.
    I kindly ask Dr Fikre Tolosa and other historians to post names of reference books that all Ethiopians should read and have on their shelves for quick reference.
    One can’t be a true defender of his country, culture and heritage with out knowing him/her self. Being informed in such a way enables us to stand on a foundation of rock instead of empty sentiments and emotions which were effectively utilized by the Derg to manipulate one whole generation to whom I belong.
    I my self would love to read more and buy more reference books that would make me learned in my own history.

  7. This piece is not even worth refering to as pseudo-academic. It is lower than that. As for comments on Eritrea, doesn’t the author know that Eritrea is not ethnically homogeneous. That alone seriously undermines the article. It is a pitty someone would go to such lengths to avoid basic truths of history. God save Ethiopia, …. and her neighbours.

    Peace Tesfa

  8. Good article. We also must have an article that says
    Why are Oromos, Ogaden Somali, Afar, Adere, Gambela, Benshangul, Gumuz, Konso, Afar, Sidamo, Wolata and the others so tribalist.

    It is good to see this.

  9. People always make one mistake. That mistake is the notion that Axumites were first and foremost Tigrians. That is totally absurd. Axum was the seat of the government just like Addis Ababa is today. People from all walks of like and parts of Ethiopia lived in Axum. In fact the Agaw people but not Tigrians played the leading role in the Axumite civilization. Morevoer, there is no proof that the original inhabitants of Axum were Tigrians. The Beja, Saho, Agaw and others lived in today’s Tigre but Tigrians came into the scene. Tigrians of the Axumite era were traders and came there for commerical purposes therefore played no role in the Axumite civilization. Today we see many Greek and Italians momuments in North Africa and the Middle East. There are also hundreds of Greek monuments in Italy and other parts of Europe. The same is true about Axum. The Axumite monuments were not built by Tigrians but the Greeks. Let’s not inflate the already inflated egos of Tigrians by giving them false witness to their contributions to Axumite civilization. Civilized people do not succumb to cave dwellers mentality such as today’s Tigrian tribalists and ethnic peddlers. Axumite civilization was never Tigrian exclusive.

    Thank you

  10. overall,the article is agreeable.Tigryans tend more towards their ethnicity at all costs.What the witing missed are some historic facts,i.e,for example Gelawideos wasn’t killed but succumbed to natural causes and his nemesis Ahmed was killed by gelawdeos in a duel and not by a Portugese soldier,just to mention a few from many facts for some reason or another given adifferent color.

  11. I don’t know if the author is an Amhara or an Oromo but his views are chauvinist nonetheless. He labels Eritreans who supported the EPLF as ethnocentric but what he fails to tell his readers is that the EPLF consisted nine ethnic groups that make the state of Eritrea. And why would an Eritrean join EPRP, MEASON or what have you when no Eritrean wanted to be part of Ethiopia. You can write and rewrite history; but the fact remains Ethiopia as we know it today doesn’t have 3000 years of history. The civilization in the area dates 1000’s of years, to be sure but that involved parts of Ethiopia, Eritrea, Sudan and Yemen. Menelik formed the present day Ethiopia and one can not talk of Ethiopia prior to that unless the land he grabbed during expansion is now not part of Ethiopia. Nations in Africa were only formed during the scramble as protectorate rights of their occupiers. Ethiopia as the only African country not to be colonized is another myth. How can you be liberated by the British after second world war if you were not colonized? I don’t care if it is 5 years or 50 years; a colony is a colony. Talk about TPLF’s ethnocentric tendencies but leave other nations like Eritrea out of your politics.

  12. As a history student before,I found this analysis as somthing which can highten the conciousness of all Ethiopians towards ethnicity and our political agenda to overthrow those who are ethnocetric.
    Fikre Tollossa,phd. is one of those intelectuals Ethiopia has in the 21st,c. and my favorite one,thanks sir,i read most of your works.

  13. well MR.FIKRE Tolosa i agree with you in a lot of thing that you wrote a bout the history of Ethiopia but when you said about AMARA they are the very AXUMIT who changed from GEZE speaking to AMAHARIC and as we know it it became AMARA. no tigeres accept Atse YOHANS ruled Ethiopia.
    so get it right Thanks

    God bless Ethiopia and our EPPF fighters

  14. Highly valued Doctor Tolossa please I beg you to put this magnificent article on paper for the next generation I personally I have never read this kind of article in short pages when it is compared the depth of this many centuries hostorical article. Please we need in a paper Doctor. I am really affraid so many people would not get the chance and the privilege of reading this valued life changing article. By the way After you pointed the Oromo and Amhara blood connection something came to my mind I heard some people from Gondar saying Babajalew I think there is a place which is called Abajale so that must be taken from Oromo language which is Jalle. Anyway please try to put on all Ethiopian internets and send this article for the Tigrean intellectuals like Tekola Hagos the most narrow tribal minded individual and other Tigrean intellectuals like him. For me the Tigrean intellectual is not an Ethiopian like you or other Ethiopian intellectuals rather they are simple Mafia tribal group from Tigrea so please reach them with your extensive wisdom Doctor.

  15. first thank you Mr Fikre Tolossa
    lets be united all ethiopian so that how hard Meles work to divied us he will fell.

    I just wnt to say to Mr Harbegna you got problem with inferiority complex. Ethiopia was a great country, if you ask people who is not ethiopian they will tell you. How meany times ethiopian was fight back outsider who to colonyz go and learn. most African they proud of it you should be one of them. Don’t allow your inferiority complex to influence your mind (don’t be ignorant

  16. It is good to talk and debate history, but history of the people. This piece, for all what it is worth, is the “history of the kings/queens and kingdoms”. Although I know very little about Ethiopian history, I would say there is a bit of revionism in this persons recollection of his country’s history. I would love to hear what the Oromos would say on this piece.
    By the way, this is not meant to discourage, rather make us all think critically before we post.

  17. Welcome back Dr. Fikre Tolossa. It has been long since I read any article from you on the web. You are one of Ethiopian giant historians for sure. I have been always inspired by your articles. May not be literally the only reason, but it gives one of the best explanations for the ethno-centric attitude we witness in TPLF and some elites of Tigray. It is a very long article and I wonder if I understand it clearly. I have three questions anyways. Isn’t the Tigre and Amhara also related, infact from the begining? Didn’t I read something like that from one of your articles before? Besides, don’t you think that your explanation (being away from power for a long time and geographical separation and absence of intermixing) also works for not only the elite but also the total population of Tigray? How do you see the nationality other minorities in Ethiopia manifest in view of the fact that they have been also away from power for such a long time, some also geographically separated and tribally not well intermixed?

    I would be happy to see your explanations in one of your future articles.

    Please keep on writing.

  18. Dr. Fikre, it was a well organized analysis. however let me add a minor point to this. To me I will not assume that there was ethnic identification as Tigre or Amhara during the Axumite period.

  19. Proud to be your compatriot. You are a true son of Ethiopia who understands history well and teaches the same to others. What an intelligent and a learned man. Well done Dr Fikrie!

  20. Doctor I thought Akushum was an Agew term or word Aku means water in Agew language Shum means appointee so how the tigreans became the Akusumit thank you.

  21. Correction: Legesse Zenawi’s grand father was named dejazmach by the Italian Invaders not by the Ethiopian Emperor.Ato Asres(Znawi’s father) came with the Italian army fighting agaist the Ethiopians. He was deafted with his Itaian Alekoch and later surredered and ask mercy. Ras Alula want to send him to prisson even death but King Menelik rather gave him mihret.To be a Dejazmach you have to serve your country or your government. So Asres(Legesse’s grand father) is not a Dejazmach rather a BANDA.

Leave a Reply