Skip to content

Meles regime to admit higher numbers of hungry

By Nicholas Benequista, OneWorld

ADDIS ABABA – Ethiopian Woyanne officials have said that the country will increase its appeal to the international community for a third time this year, criticizing donors for failing to commit resources to a hunger crisis precipitated by drought and rising food prices.

“It is the humanitarian community’s obligation to see that the humanitarian needs are fulfilled,” said Simon Mechale, who heads the country’s disaster relief agency. “The humanitarian community has not been able to fully support what was jointly established.”

Ethiopia is still seeking funding from donors after appealing to them in June for support to feed 4.6 million hungry people. Ethiopian Woyanne State Minister for Agriculture Abera Deresa said the government would increase that number as early as next week, though he declined to say by how many.

Aid workers familiar with the new appeal say the government may ask for aid for as many as 8 million and accuse the government here of failing to admit the severity of the crisis in time. Ethiopia has been eager to leave behind a legacy of famine after a drought in the mid-1980s left nearly 1 million to starve, which may explain why the country was reticent to admit the severity of its latest crisis, they say.

Now, even if the expanded appeal matches needs on the ground, aid workers worry that it may already be too late, especially amid global shortages of food.

“The Ethiopian Woyanne government is facing the crisis and is ready to admit figures it wouldn’t admit in April and March,” one Western donor official said on condition of anonymity.

Donors can take weeks to raise cash and at least four months to provide commodities from their own farmers. Once cash is available, it can take as long as eight weeks to procure food internationally and deliver it to Ethiopia.

In June, Ethiopian Woyanne Minister of Health Tewodros Adhanom announced an appeal to donors for a total of 380,000 metric tons of emergency food this year to feed 4.6 million people, more than twice the 2.2 million thought to have needed aid in April. Tewodros argued then that the government had been carefully prudent to avoid requesting too much aid.

“We always felt that there were more needy people,” said David Throp, who runs Save the Children UK’s Ethiopian office. “We welcome any acknowledgement of additional needs because it allows the international community to respond, but now it’s a question of logistics and time-lags.”

Relief efforts are already suffering from shortages after the global spike in food and gasoline prices essentially cut the purchasing power of the UN’s World Food Program (WFP) in half. Only half the needy are receiving food aid, and the rations they receive have already been cut by a third to conserve resources.

According to a June report from the WFP, the worldwide prices of staple foods like wheat and maize have nearly doubled since the beginning of the decade, making it increasingly difficult for international aid agencies to buy enough food to support crisis-ridden regions.

At the Rome Food Summit in June, governments and international aid agencies pledged to contribute an additional $6 billion to help poorer countries cope with hunger amid increasing food prices.

Food security experts say the global food crisis has emerged due to a combination of factors, including climate changes that have altered rainfall patterns and decreased harvests, increasing demand for corn ethanol and other grains to fuel cars instead of feeding people, and skyrocketing demand for meat — which requires large amounts of grain in the form of animal feed — in rapidly developing countries like China and India.

Economic speculators, who buy up grain reserves in anticipation of selling them at higher prices, have also helped to decrease supplies and increase global prices, say analysts.

“This troubling situation is unlike any the world has faced before,” says Earth Policy Institute President Lester Brown, who has studied the convergence of ecological, economic, and humanitarian issues for decades.

“The challenge is not simply to deal with a temporary rise in grain prices, as in the past, but rather to quickly alter those trends whose cumulative effects collectively threaten the food security that is a hallmark of civilization.”

Brown says that the world’s most influential countries must act swiftly to “stabilize population, restrict the use of grain to produce automotive fuel, stabilize the climate, stabilize water tables and aquifers, protect cropland, and conserve soils.”

“None of these goals can be achieved quickly,” he notes, “but progress toward all is essential to restoring a semblance of food security.”

5 thoughts on “Meles regime to admit higher numbers of hungry

  1. Can we ever believe what Woyane is capable of? Ye Woyane kilet malekia yelewim.

    Now what do we have: “The Ethiopian government is facing the crisis and is ready to admit figures it wouldn’t admit in April and March,” one Western donor official said on condition of anonymity.
    ….

    “We always felt that there were more needy people,” said David Throp, who runs Save the Children UK’s Ethiopian office. “We welcome any acknowledgement of additional needs because it allows the international community to respond, but now it’s a question of logistics and time-lags.”

    Gobez, what are we going to do? Haile Sillassie’s regime fell apart when it failed to disclose about 200,000 victims of famine. Mengisut’s regime created a million victims, but despite the brutality of the regime, I never heard Mengistu was hiding the number of famine victims. Rather, because of a failed socialist agenda, Megnistu’s regime exposed so many to famine.

    NOW, what do we have? A monster regime that has kept hostage 8 million victims of famine, and negotiates with donors to disclose a higher number in return for more aid? Can you believe? Meles who recently boastfully interviewed refusing to admit existence of famine in Ethiopia, is now willing to admit higher numbers of famine victims if donners would pledge more aid?

    This is unheard of in the annals of human history, except by invaders and occupiers who slaughter enemy population and would negotiate to stop the slaughter in return for some gain.

    I think we have now reached a point of no return with Meles & Co. We have to find ways to deal with these monsters, by any means!!!

  2. It is not too late to ask the donors countries for help, but indeed very shameful to see one’s own people starve to death because of Meles’ pride as a leader of a country capable of feeding its own people; in reality, however, Ethiopia is unable to feed 80 million Ethiopians because of the mishandling of its resources by its corrupt leaders, so Meles has no other alternatives at this crucial time except to humble himself and appeal to the West for extra handout. If the West, however, clothes its doors behind him, and says: “Enough is enough,” then, the only choice left for him is to get out of Somalia and suspend all military operations and use the money to buy grains from Canada and feed his people. I don’t think he would do such things; he would rather prefer giving lands for Saudi Arabia and get some food from the Saudi to suspending his military operation in Somalia and Ogaden. How fool he is!

  3. They blame the donors? This is unbelievable. It is a shame to say “People are hungry, because you did not give us money”. What about saying “People are hungry, because we did not care for them, for our own people.”?

  4. REVOLTIONARY DEMOCRACY! What a joke.The ignorant, illeterate
    idiots in control of Ethiopia can not answer the number one
    concern of the ethiopian people..Do not let us starve to death.Simple.
    Take your Revoltionary democracy and go to Hell!

Leave a Reply