Skip to content

ethio

Lorenzo Taezaz And The Italo-Ethiopian War (1935-1941)

By Daniel Kindie

Lorenzo Taezaz could be considered as one of the legendary heroes of the Italo-Ethiopian war of 1935-1941. From the day he left his homeland in 1925, until his untimely death in Sweden in 1946, he had an unusual life. Few Ethiopians of his generation have enjoyed a life so intense and so productive over a period of 21 years. He contributed more than his share to the liberation of Ethiopia from Italian fascism. Yet, the young generation of Ethiopians, which has grown up after the war, are almost entirely ignorant about him. The reason of his consignment to oblivion, for instance, has never been fully known. Similarly, the manner of his death which invites more questions than answers is passed over in complete silence.

The purpose of this study is limited in scope. First, it is to introduce Lorenzo Taezaz to the general reader, and possibly, to stimulate more discussion about him among scholars who study Ethiopia. Second, to investigate the actual role he played in the 1935-1941 period of Ethiopia’s struggle against fascism. This requires some information about the man’s early life, and the circumstances for his departure from Eritrea. Who was he? And what was his background? I will treat the essentials of his early life and discuss the reasons why he left his homeland, how he met Ras Teferi Mekonnen [the future Emperor Haile Selassie I], and how he started his career with the Ethiopian government.

I have reviewed the existing literature. As will be noticed, it gives him scant coverage. Most of the literature refers to him only in passing. Even important events in which he was involved appear in snippets rather than as a whole, so that their overall impact is diffused, preventing one from ever knowing his full story. For this reason, I had to interview a number of people. These include: his daughter, Mrs. Woizerit Lorenzo, the late Ambassador Ephreim Tewolde Medhin, his lifelong friend, Dr. John Spencer, a war time colleague who knew him from 1936-1946, and Mebratu Taezaz, his brother. Three of them were interviewed in Asmara in 1983, and Dr. Spencer, on 30 August 1987 in New Haven, Connecticut.

There is some controversy about the circumstances of his departure from Eritrea. The controversy has something to do with Italian war plans to invade Ethiopia, and Lorenzo’s alleged understanding of that plan as related to me by his daughter. Before coming to grips with his actual role in the fascist Italy period, therefore, I have found it important to evaluate his daughter’s version of Lorenzo’s immigration to Ethiopia. For this reason, I had also to provide some sketchy information about the historical background of the Italian occupation of Eritrea and the subsequent threat to the rest of Ethiopia.

Brief Background

Lorenzo Taezaz was born on 30 June 1900 in the Akele Guzaie province of Eritrea, then an Italian colony. He received his first education in Italian schools in Asmara and Keren and started his career with the Italian colonial administration when he was still very young. Because of his intelligence and hard work, Lorenzo rose to the rank of Secretary to the Governor of Asmara, the highest position that an Eritrean could reach in the colonial administration.

In 1924, while on vacation in Aden, he met Ras Teferi Mekonnen, the future Haile Selassie, who was there on an official visit, and who encouraged him to go to Ethiopia. A year later, Lorenzo went to Addis Ababa. Subsequently, Ras Teferi Mekonnen arranged for his education, and along with other Ethiopians, he sent him to France on a government scholarship. Lorenzo spent the next eight years at the University of Montpelier where he completed his studies in Law and Philosophy. Apart from his native Tigrigna, he already spoke Amharic, Arabic and Italian, but Montpelier also provided him with an opportunity to master French and English.

He returned to Ethiopia in 1933 and began to serve the Ethiopian government in several capacities: Secretary, Ministry of Justice (1933); member of the Anglo-Ethiopian Boundary Commission which demarcated Ethiopia’s borders with former British Somaliland (1933-34); member of the same Commission which was charged with the duty of surveying the grazing grounds of the Ogaden, and investigating the causes of the Wal-Wal incident of 1934, which led to the Italo-Ethiopian War of 1935-1941; appointed private secretary of Haile Selassie, and in addition he served as liaison officer to the international press (1935-1936). He even saw action at the Battle of Maichew (1936) that culminated in the defeat of the Ethiopians by the Italians.

Lorenzo had presented a plan to Haile Selassie to transfer the government center to Gore (1) – a remote and inaccessible town in western Ethiopia from where the counter-offensive could be prosecuted. However, the costs and risks of fighting the mechanized Italian army was debated and measured against the risks and costs of not fighting. When the Council of Ministers agreed by twenty one to three vote(2), that the risks were too grave and the costs too high, it was decided that Haile Selassie should go and personally present Ethiopia’s case to the League of Nations. In May 1936, therefore, Lorenzo left Ethiopia and accompanied Emperor Haile Selassie in his exile to Europe. There, he was appointed Ethiopia’s Permanent Delegate to the League of Nations and subsequently took an active role in the struggle against Italian fascism. During the occupation, Lorenzo secretly entered Ethiopia on several occasions. After Ethiopia’s liberation in 1941, he was appointed Minister for Foreign Affairs (1941-1943), Minister for Posts, Telephones and Telegrams (1943), President of the Chamber of Deputies (1943-1944), Minister to Moscow, USSR (1944-1946), and Delegate to the Paris Peace Conference (May 1946). A month later, he died in a hospital in Stockholm, Sweden.(3)

When I visited the late Ambassador Ephreim Tewolde Medhin at his residence in Asmara, he was ninety years of age. The following is a summary of what I was able to gather from him:

Interview I. Ambassador Ephreim Tewolde Medhin:

Lorenzo was my life long friend. Ever since we left Eritrea, we shared adversity and happiness together. There was no future for both of us in Eritrea. In 1925 we escaped to Aden. It should be recalled that Lorenzo had met Ras Teferi Mekonnen in Aden a year earlier and had thus invited him to go to Addis Ababa. I took the boat and waited for him in Djibouti. When we met in Djibouti, both of us were in tears. From there, we took the train and went to Addis Ababa. Ras Teferi Mekonnen asked us what we wanted to do. Both of us requested him to send us abroad to school, which he did. I went to Beirut. Lorenzo went to France… What we did for Ethiopia during the war, is for history to judge. We stayed in Europe to help intensify the diplomatic struggle, but Lorenzo was exceptional. He even traveled inside Italian occupied Ethiopia on secret missions. I can assure you that he was a selfless patriot. At a time when an entire generation of educated Ethiopians was simply wiped out by fascism, he was Ethiopia’s eyes and ears. The British only talked to him.(4)

Dr. John Spencer knew Lorenzo for some ten years. The following provides what he could recall from memory:

Interview II: John Spencer:

I met Lorenzo on 15 January 1936 in Dessie at the headquarters of His Majesty the Emperor Haile Selassie. I remember everything very well. Even the place where we met was kept dark for fear of Italian air raids. In general, he gave me the impression of an extremely reserved man. Perhaps his inner nature needed privacy and solitude for reflection. He had a quick mind and a sharp tongue. He impressed me as being an intellectual. He spoke excellent French and English. We collaborated on the war bulletins for some months in Addis Ababa. We met again in London in June 1936 where we worked together. He was very meticulous. It was easy to work out a sentence with him. He helped draft Haile Selassie’s 1936 address to the League of Nations, translated his speeches and led the Ethiopian delegation to Geneva. In 1938, Haile Selassie wanted to return to Ethiopia to lead the resistance, and so, he sent Lorenzo to Ethiopia to assess the situation and to help organize the Arbegnoch (the patriots). He did a thorough job. As a result, the Emperor decided to move. However, the British strongly objected to the plan, contending that it was premature. But the truth is, since they were negotiating with the Italians over the Mediterranean, they did not want the talks to be prejudiced. Lorenzo again spent some months inside Ethiopia in 1939 and re-organized the resistance. He did a marvelous job. The Italians left Ethiopia in 1941, and I met Lorenzo in Addis Ababa in 1943. This time, he was the foreign minister. He performed very well. It was not an easy task to evict the British from Ethiopia. He had a terrible time as they were toying with the idea of establishing a protectorate over Ethiopia. But, nevertheless, he came out with flying colors. The last time I met him was at the Paris Peace Conference in May 1946. A month later, he died in Sweden.(5)

Source Review

There is an enormous literature on Italian fascism and Ethiopia. But as pointed out earlier, however, the coverage on Lorenzo is scanty, and where it is not, disconnected details are not united.

Kebede Tesema, an important Ethiopian intelligence officer of the time, who was later to occupy several ministerial posts in Haile Selassie’s government, published Historical Notes (Addis Ababa, 1955). Among other things, his book contains invaluable information on how the Ethiopians managed to sustain effective guerrilla warfare against the mechanized Italian Army. Although he fully recognizes Lorenzo’s vital contribution to the prosecution of the war, strangely enough, he does not say much about his role in making that operation effective. Similarly, the Italian journalist, Del Boca, in his illuminating book, The Ethiopian War 1935-1941, (London, 1965), mentions Lorenzo three times. Even then, this is done in the context of his exile to Europe along with Haile Selassie, the speech he made at the League of Nations in 1938, and how he distributed arms to the insurgents in Western Ethiopia in 1939.

In the same way, Richard Greenfield, in his Ethiopia, A new Political History, (New York, 1965), provides some insight into the valuable information Lorenzo brought out of Ethiopia describing the extent of guerrilla operations and the poor morale of the Italians.

John Spencer, who served the Ethiopian government for many years as advisor in foreign affairs, as has already been pointed out, knew Lorenzo from 1936-1946. In his informative book, Ethiopia At Bay (Algonac, Michigan 1984), he writes of Lorenzo’s French education, the information he used to collect from the war fronts (1934-35) for the publication of war bulletins, his translation of Haile Selassie’s speeches into French in Geneva, and the detailed information he brought out of Ethiopia in 1939 regarding the status and operations of the patriotic forces. He also mentions the invaluable contributions Lorenzo made to the military campaigns through which the emperor returned to Ethiopia in 1941, and Haile Selassie’s praise of the significant role played by Lorenzo in the liberation campaign of Ethiopia.

In his recent book on the Italo-Ethiopian War, Haile Selassie’s war: The Italian-Ethiopian Campaign, 1934-1941 (New York, 1984), Anthony Mockler provides Lorenzo’s biographical sketch in just six lines and dismisses his activities with the Ethiopian refugees in the Sudan and Kenya, in just a couple of paragraphs. Beyond that, there is nothing. There is also the autobiography of Haile Selassie, My Life and Ethiopia’s Progress, 1892-1937 (London, 1976). In this book, Haile Selassie praises Lorenzo’s diplomatic skill and the outstanding services he rendered to the country.

Let us then begin with a brief survey of Italy’s involvement in the affairs of the area – an involvement which probably caused Lorenzo’s departure from his place of birth.

Background to the Italian Occupation of Eritrea and the Threat Against Ethiopia

The Eritrea of the 1920s that Lorenzo left, was a sad place. Eritreans were constantly reminded of their inferiority in their own country by their colonial masters, the Italians. The Asmara municipality excluded them from all participation. In the central government hierarchy, they had no part. Eritreans could at best aspire to be low-paid clerks or orderlies. There was no trace when they could advance towards participation in government, or of administration scheme which could lead to it. There was to be, in perpetuity, only rulers and the passive ruled.(6) The combined effect of the policy of colonial oppression, social humiliation and material deprivation had several results in Eritrea. Of immediate concern to us during this particular period is the immigration of some 200,000 Eritreans to Ethiopia. One such Eritrean was Lorenzo Taezaz.

Why did he escape from Colonial Eritrea? Was his immigration to Ethiopia largely inspired by personal feelings of hopelessness in his future in colonial Eritrea, or by some other purpose? Was he conscious of a specific threat against Ethiopia at the time? How was it possible for him to play an outstanding role in the resistance movement against fascism, and eventually to become Ethiopia’s Foreign Minister? These questions are pertinent. It is useful to consider them in the context of the historical background that led to Italy’s involvement in the affairs of the people of the region.

As far as Italy was concerned, Asmara was merely a stepping-stone to bigger designs: Eritrea was acquired with the larger objective of the whole Ethiopia in mind.(7) The fact that between 1890 and 1896 Italy launched a series of assaults against Ethiopia from Eritrea is a sufficient testimony to that design. In any event, the series of intolerable military encroachments on Ethiopia’s sovereignty culminated in the Battle of Adowa of 1896, in which the Italians were routed.

As The Spectator of March 7, 1896 observed regretfully:

The Italians have suffered a great disaster – greater than has ever occurred in modern times to white men in Africa. Adowa was the bloodiest of all colonial battles. (8)

Italy’s pride was wounded. If ever Rome was to occupy a respectable place in the councils of Europe, that national humiliation and disgrace had to be avenged. Thereafter, propelled by Mussolini’s 1922 dictum, that “Italy must either expand or explode,”(9) fascism came to power. In such a situation, the first policy declaration el Duce made was to settle once and for all, the great account which has been left open since 1896.(10) “If only Italy had 6,000 more soldiers in Adwa, the result would have been different,” he was to say later.

To that end, he gave the necessary directives for building up Eritrea’s economic infrastructure in order to facilitate military mobility for the conquest of Ethiopia. Such a direction can be discerned from a letter Mussolini wrote in 1925 to the Prince of Scala, the Minister of the Colonies, in which Mussolini called his attention to the poor defensive conditions of Eritrea, and to correct such deficiencies as might exist.(11) Since nobody was threatening Eritrea, one can only interpret that message to mean preparations for committing aggression against Ethiopia.

Similarly, Pietro Badoglio, the Chief of Staff of the Italian Armed Forces, had instructed General Malladra in 1926 to carry out a thorough study of Eritrea’s defenses (read preparations for war), including the possible use of poison gas, either through aerial bombing or through artillery shelling.(12) Ten years later, Badoglio, who directed Italy’s invasion of Ethiopia from Colonial Eritrea and Somaliland, did precisely that.

Lorenzo’s Departure from Eritrea

I had heard contradictory accounts about Lorenzo’s departure from Eritrea. Since the evidence provided by anyone of the people I talked to was insufficient to prove any point, I decided to interview Woizerit Lorenzo, his daughter. In response to my question why her father, who was privileged by the standards of many Eritreans, because he was working at the Civil and Political Affairs Department of the colonial administration, left Colonial Eritrea and went to Ethiopia, Woizerit Lorenzo explained her father’s immigration in the following way:

Interview III:

One day, while he was filing papers, he read a secret military document which spelt out Italian war plans against Ethiopia, including the intention to use poison gas. Taken by shock and horror, while he was weeping, his tears dropped on the papers and spoiled the document. No sooner had this taken place than his Italian boss discovered what had happened and asked him why he was sprinkling water on vital government document? Being naive and innocent, he confessed that it was not water that spoilt the pages, but his tears. “Why did you have to weep”? asked the Italian. “Because I read the secret document which tells a lot about what you intend to do against Ethiopia,” he replied. “Yes, but that has nothing to do with you Eritreans. You are worried about a different people and society, which should not be of concern to you,” retorted the Italian. Three days later, Lorenzo told Ephreim Tewolde Medhin about what he had read. After that, both discussed the matter and escaped to Aden and from there they went to Addis Ababa where they met Haile Selassie.(13)

How much reliance could be attached to the information, especially that provided by his daughter? Did he really escape from Eritrea because of what he had read? And did such information ever exist? The 1925 letter of Mussolini to the Minister of the Colonies may provide a clue. There is also Badoglio’s handwritten instruction to General Malladra regarding the use of poison gas. These clues, when considered along with the fact that mustard gas that had been shipped into Massawa was utilized to substitute for the mountain warfare in which Italians lacked training (14), may lend considerable weight to what Woizerit Lorenzo contends. However, when Italy launched its unprovoked aggression against Ethiopia in 1935, the country was not prepared to resist the aggression. In fact, the primary cause of Ethiopia’s defeat was that it had no arms, and was allowed none. The secondary cause of its defeat was that it had no aviation.(15) It therefore appears very unlikely that Lorenzo had access to secret war plans. For, if he did, he would have made it available to Hale Selassie, and that would have given Ethiopia a span of ten years with which to strengthen its defenses.

One is inclined to think that his daughter has read back into the past on the basis of the actual use of poison gas, the likely Italian preparations to do something against Ethiopia and Lorenzo’s patriotic role against fascism. In such a set-up, it becomes easy within the family to make Lorenzo into an even more prescient hero. While one does not deny the utility of oral sources, perhaps the most one can say in this particular case is that her information cannot be used to supply adequate answers to the type of questions we raised earlier.

That Lorenzo served the Italian authorities from 1920-1925, is not debatable, and that he met Haile Selassie in Aden in 1924 is not also in dispute. But what cannot be sustained is the contention that he escaped from Eritrea because of the “secret document” he had read. Available evidence does in fact support the view that his escape from his home land was likely motivated by his daily exposure to constant humiliation, provocation and racial discrimination.

In this regard, let us consider the views of the London Times correspondent George Steer, who was expelled from Addis Ababa by the Italians in 1936, and who later participated in the liberation campaign of Ethiopia in the capacity of a British Intelligence Officer in charge of Offensive Propaganda. Steer who knew Lorenzo both in Europe and in Africa has this to say:

He rose to be Secretary to the Governor in Asmara when he was still very young, for Lorenzo is quick as lightening. It was the highest position that he could reach: Lorenzo is not a white man. Embittered by his servile condition, he could bear it no longer after a scene in a small cinema to which Italian friends had invited him. Other Italians hissed them for bringing in a colored man. Lorenzo was already miserable enough. With his savings he fled to Aden and waited there in poverty until [Haile Selassie] picked him up.(16)

One is inclined to accept this version of Lorenzo’s escape from Colonial Eritrea. It is also likely that Steer heard it from the man himself. Since impressions of youth are more lasting that those of the immediate past, it seems that such an experience had a chilling effect on his outlook. It made him resent the Italians very deeply. In expecting him to treat them not as an equal, but with a submissiveness demanded of a subject, the Italians succeeded in converting him into an envenomed and resolute enemy for all time.

Thereafter, and as mentioned earlier, Lorenzo went to school in France, and having returned to Ethiopia in 1933, he began to serve the government in several capacities until he was forced into exile again by the Italians, this time to Europe along with Haile Selassie.

Lorenzo’s Role Against Italian Fascism

Haile Selassie’s moving address to the League of Nations that stirred the conscience of the world and which was drafted by Lorenzo in part reads:

I am here to give Europe warning of the doom that awaits it, if it bows before force. I ask the fifty-two nations assembled here to give my country the support they promised her. There is not on this earth any nation that is higher than any other, apart from the kingdom of God. God and History will remember your judgment.(17)

It should be noted here that after delivering this historic address to the League of Nations, the Emperor Haile Selassie settled in Bath, England. As far as the League was concerned, therefore, it was Lorenzo, who in his capacity as Permanent Delegate of Ethiopia accredited to that world body, who continued the diplomatic struggle in Geneva. To that end, he even carried his credentials signed and sealed in his pocket. If any motion prejudicial to Ethiopia were to be tabled at the Council, he had all the intention of walking into the Assembly Hall and occupying the vacant post.(18) However, he was also impatient with the obstacles that loomed on all sides. As was to be expected, when Ethiopia was sacrificed by the League at the altar of political expediency, Lorenzo could not but agree with those few Ethiopian ministers who saw the virtues of guerrilla warfare.

With regard to the situation inside Italian occupied Ethiopia, it should be noted that Italian atrocities that were regarded by many as the apogee of fascist barbarity had reached a climax. The Ethiopian nationalist movement was gaining ground. There was continuous rebellion, even if it was uncoordinated, bedeviled as it was by factions which adhered to personalities rather than programs. Italian censorship was so strict that little information reached the outside world. It was therefore assumed that the fascists were making good their occupation of the country. Hence, in February 1938, Haile Selassie decided to dispatch Lorenzo to make a secret visit to Ethiopia and to explore the possibilities of his return to lead the resistance. Lorenzo had to succeed in this mission, if only because the prospect of failure was too grim to contemplate. Accordingly, he went to Ethiopia and spent several months inside the country. He delivered Haile Selassie’s messages to the various leaders of the resistance, assessed their strength and weakness, mediated their disputes, distributed arms at strategic points, helped to integrate them into a cohesive fighting force, and left the country.(19) Three months later, Lorenzo was back in Europe. Haile Selassie was so impressed by what he had to tell him, that he decided to report the whole situation to the League of Nations, some of whose members had started recognizing Italian occupation of Ethiopia. But since the emperor was ill, Lorenzo had to read the speech for him, which in any case, he had drafted:

Is the League, the appointed guardian of the principles of international justice, about to sign its own death warrant by tearing up with its own hands the covenant which is the sole justification of its being? Is right to triumph over Might, or Might over Right? [Let me reiterate to you here and now] that an implacable guerrilla warfare is being waged and will continue to be waged until either the [country] is evacuated by the Italians, or the Ethiopian people have been exterminated.

… The Italian government exercises no control over the greater part of Ethiopia… Its troops merely control the towns (where) garrisons can only be supplied with provisions and munitions by means of aircraft. (I am annexing to this statement) the petitions presented by the Ethiopian warrior chiefs setting forth the situation and asking for the assistance of the League of Nations.(20)

The petitions, no doubt, were written by warrior chiefs, at Lorenzo’s suggestion. He took the petitions with him and annexed them to Haile Selassie’s speech. And from the point of view of those States that were hesitating to recognize Ethiopia’s occupation by Italy, the speech and the petitions mush have had a restraining influence. Countries like Sweden, Mexico, the USA, USSR and others never recognized Italian occupation of Ethiopia.

In 1939, Lorenzo went back to Ethiopia on a similar mission. According to George Steer, who seems to have closely following his activities:

Lorenzo, a lively man who used to worry where to get the next stamp to send a letter to the Secretariat of the League of Nations, came to Paris by arrangement. His timing was good. The League of Nations did not meet that year. He went off dressed in a tarboosh, saying that he was a Sudanese of the Eritrean frontier tribe of the Habab.(21) The volcano (the Ethiopian resistance movement) permanently simmered, and Lorenzo’s coming gave it a poke. He poked it all around – north and south, east and west, skillfully exploiting the resentment that had been simmering. Among other things, he composed the quarrels of the resistance leaders in Gojjam after three days of negotiation. Elsewhere, he promised the people that the end is not far off.(22)

Similarly, Christopher Sykes, who describes Lorenzo as “an Ethiopian of high character and distinguished record,” reports that he was known at this time as Wolde Michael, elsewhere as Thompson and correctly as Lorenzo Taezaz.(23) The French intelligence officer, Colonel Robert Monnier, who had also made a clandestine journey in the interior of Ethiopia in July 1938, taught Lorenzo how to use a compass in his arduous travels. Lorenzo therefore extensively traveled inside Ethiopia. He constantly disguised himself in order to elude the Italians.

But in areas where he felt secure, he appeared in an Ethiopian army officer’s uniform with a considerable escort of Ethiopian soldiers. The fact that Lorenzo was able to wonder about Ethiopia in uniform and with an escort, it was said, is an indication of the state of affairs prevalent inside the country.(24) At other times, he traveled disguised as a priest or as a peasant.(25) After several months in the country, and after having established an Ethiopian Intelligence Bureau in Khartoum Lorenzo proceeded to Cairo to give full account of his discoveries to the skeptical British Middle East Headquarters.(27)

By the winter of 1939, he was back in England with news to gladden and inspire. Again Haile Selassie wanted to move, but this time, the British were not convinced that he had a large following in the country. In 1938, if Britain did not act in support of Haile Selassie, it must have been certainly acting, when it argued that the emperor’s wish to move to Ethiopia and to lead the resistance was premature. But the truth is, as Spencer remarked, since Britain was negotiating with the Italians over the Mediterranean, it did not want the talks to be prejudiced. However, British reluctance a year later had some merit worthy of note. At a meeting of some 900 patriotic commanders which took place in Gondar, the need to abolish the monarchy and declare Ethiopia a republic was discussed. To that end, even a document was prepared for the League of Nations touching on the form which a future government of the country might take.(28) Since Britain was aware of that, London did not want to end up by backing a man whose leadership was challenged. To dispel their doubts, however, Lorenzo was sent back to Ethiopia. This time, he was to provide evidence that important members of the resistance affirmed their allegiance to the emperor. He collected 10,000 signatures in a matter of weeks and helped to persuade the British to support Haile Selassie’s claim to the throne.

On June 10, 1940, Italy declared war on France and Britain. As a result, Haile Selassie was allowed to go to Khartoum to organize and lead a liberation army. He immediately asked for the battalion of trained Eritreans which had deserted from the Italian army in 1937, but which was kept in internment in Kenya.(29) Who else but Lorenzo could go to Kenya? He went there and read them Haile Selassie’s invitation requesting them to join the resistance. They responded with wild cries of delight,(30) and they did. Back in Khartoum, more work was waiting for Lorenzo, and more duties that needed his attention. He wrote the decrees and the military mobilization orders of Haile Selassie, which the British Royal Air Force effectively utilized in the propaganda warfare against the Italians. Eritreans in Kassala, for instance, were seen to kiss the seal, press it to their foreheads and weep.(31) At long last, as the British army moved to evict the Italians from Ethiopia, it entered the country along the tracks blazed by Lorenzo Taezaz.(32)

Conclusion

It was pointed out earlier that because the existing literature gives scant coverage to Lorenzo’s background in general, and to the actual role he played in the Italo-Ethiopian war of 1935-1941 in particular, this study would attempt to rectify that limitation. From the discussion we have already had, we can therefore make the following conclusions.

Although Lorenzo’s escape from Eritrea was largely motivated by the reality of an empty future in his homeland, his uncompromising position against fascism seems to have been largely inspired by his early experience of constant humiliation and racial discrimination. Those painful memories have lived with him for very many years. In those days, Haile Selassie needed educated young Ethiopians to help him in his modernization program. He sent several of them to Europe to study European methods of administration, science and technology. As fate would have it, in sending Lorenzo to France, he did make a wise decision. It paid off.

Lorenzo, who lacked neither ideals nor insight, successfully played several roles as a pressman, diplomat, intelligence officer, agitator, and counselor, and discharged his responsibilities with great distinction. In the process, he displayed great fortitude and endurance. For no one can dispute the key role he played in Ethiopia’s liberation. But more than most, Lorenzo’s commitment to duty must have strengthened Haile Selassie’s faith in education.

By delivering the Emperor’s messages to the various leaders of the resistance, Lorenzo provided the movement with a sense of direction and helped co-ordinate the internal and external struggle against Italian fascism. Whenever disputes arose among the leaders, by appealing to their sense of patriotism and by mediating their conflicts, he helped in the emergence of a cohesive and formidable fighting force that carried out devastating guerrilla operations against a mechanized army considered invincible at the time.

If thousands of peasants could turn into soldiers overnight, fight with limitless courage, and turn the tide of the war, they owe it to Lorenzo’s organizational and agitation ability and to the arms he distributed to them at critical times and places. If Eritrean soldiers, who were in the service of fascism, could desert the Italian army and join the Ethiopian forces of resistance, it was in part because of the knowledge that Lorenzo was around.

As a lawyer, and fluent in several European languages, Lorenzo effectively argued Ethiopia’s case in Geneva, and gained for his country considerable sympathy and support.

When the British government hesitated in supporting Haile Selassie’s return to Ethiopia, contending that the emperor had no power base inside the country, Lorenzo was instrumental in changing London’s mind. He went to Italian occupied Ethiopia, collected the signatures of 10,000 important members of the resistance who affirmed their allegiance to the emperor, and convinced the British to go along with Haile Selassie. Is there any wonder then, if the late Prime Minister Endalkachew Mekonnen could immortalize Lorenzo’s name in the funeral oration by paying tribute to his memory in words that are both fitting and deserving?(33)

Bibliography and Endnotes

1. Steer, G. L. Caesar in Abyssinia, Hodden and Stoughton Ltd., London 1936, p. 356.

2. Ibid, p. 364.

3. The rumor mills in Ethiopia have been grinding out conflicting stories about his death. It is strongly alleged by many Ethiopians that Lorenzo was poisoned by Wolde Giorgis Wolde Yohannes, Haile Selassie’s powerful Minister of the Pen, who deeply resented Lorenzo’s wide popularity with Haile Selassie. Spencer for one is convinced that he died a natural death. He claims that Lorenzo suffered from intestinal adhesions.

4. Interview I, December 10, 1983, Asmara. The Ambassador was very sick, but still he was kind enough to talk to me for some minutes. While trying to recall the circumstances of their departure

from Eritrea, tears were constantly in his eyes.

5. Interview II was conducted on August 30, 1987, New Haven, Connecticut.

6. Longrigg, H. Stephen: A Short History of Eritrea, the Claredon Press, 1945, p. 135.

7. Marcus, Harold: Haile Selassie I, the Formative Years, 1892-1936, University of California Press, 1987, p.84.

8. The Spectator, March 7, 1896.

9. Coffey, M. Thomas: The Lion by Tail, the Story of the Italo- Ethiopian War, Viking Press, New York. 1970, p.7.

10. Kirkpatrick, Ivor: Mussolini, A Study in Power, Hawthorn Books, New York, 1964.

11. de Bono, Emilio: The Conquest of the Empire, London 1937, p.2.

12 Instructions for General Malladra, Rome, 10 July, 1926, IFM/MAI, 50/24/64, ibid., Marcus, p.76.

13. Interview III, July 15, 1983, Asmara.

14. Barker, A.J.; The Civilizing Mission: A History of the Italo-Ethiopian War of 1935-1936, the Dial Press, New York, 1968, p.242.

15. Ibid, Caesar in Abyssinia, p.8.

16. Ibid, p.73.

17. The Autobiography of Emperor Haile Selassie I, translated by Edward Ullendorff, Oxford University Press, 1976, pp.299-312.

18. Sanford, Christine: Ethiopia Under Haile Selassie, J.M. Dent and Sons Ltd. London, 1946, p.100. His brother, Mebratu Taezaz whom I interviewed in Asmara on August 15, 1983, informed me: “Between 1937 and 1941, Lorenzo entered Ethiopia several times. He had to disguise himself sometimes as a woman, sometimes as a peasant, and sometimes as a priest. The Italians could not tolerate his activities and had to issue an award for anyone who could catch him.”

19. An important Italian source that provides interesting reading about Lorenzo especially from the Italian point of view is Angelo del Boca’s Gli italiani in Africa Orientale, Vol. I: Dall’Unita alla marcia su Roma, Bari, Laterza, 1976, pp.97, 189, 246, 691; Vol. II: La conquista dell Impero: (1979); pp. 336-339, Vol. III (1982), La caduta dell’ impero, pp.27-28.

20. League of Nations, Provisional Agenda of the 101st Session of the Council, May 9th, 1938, Geneva: Document C. 193. M. 104. 1938. VII.

* Why Paris? Britain also was not making much progress in its negotiations with Mussolini. Haile Selassie was still in England and he could be used against Italy. Since Steer was working for the British Intelligence Service, he must have been instructed to contact Lorenzo.

21. Steer, G.L.: Sealed and Delivered, Hodden and Stoughton Ltd. London, 1942, pp. 8-41.

22. Ibid.

23. Sykes, Christopher: Orde Wingate, A Biography, The world Publishing Co., 1959, New York, pp. 240-244. Wingate commanded the British army in the liberation campaign of Ethiopia.

24. Ibid, Sanford, p. 104.

25. Ibid, Baker, p. 309.

26. Gabre Meskel Habtemariam was from Seraie, Eritrea. He completed his studies in engineering, University of Paris in 1928. In the 1940s he was editor of the Voice of Eritrea, which demanded Eritrea’s unification with Ethiopia.

27. Sanford, Christine: The Lion of Judah Hath Prevailed, J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd., London, 1955, p.86.

28. Greenfield, Richard: Ethiopia, a New Political History, Frederick A. Praeger Publishers, New York, 1965, pp. 247-48.

29. Ibid, Sykes, p. 244.

30. Ibid, Sealed and Delivered, p. 103.

31. Ibid, The Lion of Judah, p. 33.

32. Ibid, p.26.

33. Lorenzo! You are no more with us. But history will remember you as a great patriot. You stand head and shoulders above us all. The outstanding services you rendered to the cause of Ethiopia’s liberation have already occupied a prominent place in the history of Ethiopia. Your tenacity, bravery and single mindedness of purpose, will, forever, inspire millions of Ethiopians. For more of the oration, see Sendick Alamatchin, Amharic Weekly, June 25, 1946.

World-renowned journalists speak up about Eskinder Nega

“Who among us could write what I’m about to read,” asked Carl Bernstein, “spirit unbowed, faith in freedom and the power of the written word untrammeled?” That is how Bernstein, a legend of American journalism, paid tribute to one of Ethiopia’s most improbable convicted “terrorist,” Eskinder Nega, a brave fellow journalist who sits in jail for speaking truth to power at the  Public Forum program about imprisoned writers and artists presented by The Public Theater and PEN American Center on December 3, 2012. Bernstein was reading an article Eskinder published just five days before his arrest. The article criticized the government’s arrest of a 72-old-year actor on terrorism charges and discussed the improbability of critical journalists and dissidents as terror suspects.

Ethiopian migrants abused and unwelcome in Yemen

Desperately seeking a future

By Graham Peebles | mwcnews.net

December 18, 2012

Year on year the numbers of men women and children leaving Ethiopia in search of work and freedom from repression in one of the Gulf States and beyond is increasing. Lured by the often hollow prospect of earning enough money to support their family, United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) estimate around 85,000 men women and children, desperate and naïve, have this year, no matter the severe risks, made their way to Yemen, the hub of migration out of the Horn of Africa.

In the last six years around 250,000 Ethiopians have made the dangerous journey into this very poor, deeply divided country besieged with internal problems, which has limited resources, the second highest rate of chronic child malnutrition in the world and where 45% of the populations live in poverty.

Into this chaos step the Ethiopian migrants, who, unlike Somali’s have no refugee status, suffer from poor consular support and are seen by most Yemenis as an unwelcome burden. They sit low on the domestic workers hierarchy and, along with other African nationals are discriminated against throughout the Gulf region where xenophobia and racism has found expression in the region’s politics and government policies.

The majority of migrants leave the security of their home, the love and comfort of their families, not because they want to, but because they have, they believe, no alternative. Overwhelmingly young, 18–30 years of age, from rural or semi-rural environments, poorly educated with many lacking basic literacy, driven by poverty the majority go in search of work, whist around 25% are estimated to be from political opposition parties.  The Oromo Liberation Front (OLF) who make up almost 50% of all registered migrants arriving in Yemen, and the Ogoden National Liberation Front (ONLF). Legitimate groups persecuted and branded terrorists, by the EPRDF government that in all but name, rules over a single party state and allows no form of political dissent or opposition, no matter the constitutional content to the contrary.

The influence of smugglers, masquerading under the acceptable guise of ‘broker’ on many vulnerable individuals living in rural areas, with no knowledge of the wider world, is great. Imbedded within the community they paint a picture of migration coloured by wealth and prosperity, opportunity and excitement. Accounts of horrific migration experiences are known, but all too often ignored,’ smoking kills’ deterring nobody. Arguments of self-persuasion and denial reinforced by brokers who see another victim, another human commodity, to be wrung dry. Migrants and smugglers alike are pushed to extremes, desperately trying to survive in a ‘dog eat dog’ world, dominated by an unjust, corrupt market economy, that persecutes the poor and concentrates unlimited wealth and power in the hands of the few; causing extreme inequality, hardship and unbridled human and environmental destruction. A system In which huge corporations, banks and financial institutions of the developed nations along with their allied governments condition and define developing countries as they try against all odds to haul themselves out of poverty.

Hopeless journeys made in hope

Djibouti city is the first major stage in the harrowing journey to Yemen, here or at sea all possessions, including mobile phones, cash and clothes are stolen, by smugglers, corrupt police or border guards. The journey to Djibouti’s capital is harsh and dangerous, in which many Ethiopian migrants die of starvation, dehydration or are killed by bandits. Trafficking is also serious a danger, Djibouti the US state department  say is “a transit, source, and destination country for men, women, and children subjected to forced labor and sex trafficking… [Migrant] women and girls may fall victim to domestic servitude or forced prostitution after reaching Djibouti City, the Ethiopia-Djibouti trucking corridor, or Obock – the preferred crossing point into Yemen,” and gateway to the Gulf. Here migrants “have no access to food, safe drinking water or shelter from the sun,” the Danish Refugee Council (DRC) report, ‘Desperate Choices’,  states, and wait for days or weeks for favourable conditions to cross the perilous waters of the Gulf of Aden, in flimsy boats manned by vicious criminal gangs. They have usually come from Ethiopia by truck, although occasionally the entire journey is made on foot, over weeks through one of the hottest, most inhospitable areas in the world. Some aren’t lucky enough to get to the port, in September last year, IRIN 15/11/11  report, 60 Ethiopian migrants were found dead about 120 km west of Djibouti’s capital.

Abduction murder and rape

More shocking even than the numbers of people is the violent treatment they face. Murder, abduction and ransom demands, torture, rape, sexual abuse and more rape, are the nightmares many are subjected to by criminal gangs and smugglers. And all in the pursuit, not of happiness, which they left behind, but $100 a month, to feed and clothe their families 1000 kilometers or more away.

On arrival in Yemen men and women are separated, wives taken from husbands, daughters from Fathers brothers from sisters. Trafficking and multiple rape of women is widespread, IRIN 12/03/12 state “the majority of the approximately 3,000 women held by smugglers in Haradh [on the border with Saudi Arabia] over the past year were raped, many of them repeatedly.”DRC relate this account from a 15-year-old boy, who “was captured by Abd al-Qawi’s gang. They tied a rope round my legs and hung me upside down and beat me almost to death for three days. I was made to watch an Ethiopian woman being raped and an Ethiopian baby about one year old being killed.”Cases of male rape, punishment for trying to stop the rape of a wife or sister, have also been documented.

On a positive note, deaths at the hands of smugglers have dramatically decreased, only to be replaced by another atrocity – abduction, the terrifying experience of the majority. With $100 – 300 being demanded from family members who can barely feed themselves, let alone pay a ransom. Torture and violence at the hands of hostage takers is brutal; pulling teeth, gouging eyes, driving nails through hands and feet, cigarette burns are all reported, and if ransoms are not paid, migrants, after this hell are often beaten to death. In March this year 70 Ethiopian men and women were discovered in Yemen’s Hajjah Governorate, again near the border with Saudi Arabia, the UN humanitarian news and analysis,  reports, “their captors, they said, had beaten them with pipes, burned them with cigarettes and poured liniment in their eyes making them scream in pain.” This horrific incident indicative of many follows close on the heels of the killing of three Ethiopian men in January, shot while trying to escape from smugglers. They had made the arduous journey from rural Ethiopia to Yemen, full of hope, only to be tortured and finally murdered.

The ordeal of women begins in Djibouti, DRC report an Ethiopian man recounting the sea passage when “four Yemeni smugglers were on board the boat. They raped the girls in front of us, we were not able to move or to speak, and those girls were already sold to Yemeni traffickers.” Many are abducted and held captive, sometimes for months on end, their experiences are harrowing in the extreme, DRC tell of a 16 year old girl from Wollo who was imprisoned for six months and repeatedly raped by gang members. Far from being the exception the majority relate incidents of sexual abuse, with “many reporting being raped at almost every stage in their journey and stay within Yemen.” They “are often captured, kidnapped and disappear and it is believed they are trafficked for sexual or domestic slavery”. It is unclear where women are trafficked, it is suggested they are sold to Saudi families as “virtual slaves”, many no doubt end up in some kind of sex trade, those that eventually make it out of Saudi Arabia relate incidents of rape at the hands of brokers or employers. The horrific stories are endless, extreme abuse and brutality by vicious criminals who are destroying lives in the thousands, and it seems, with impunity. Those victims lucky enough to make it home need therapeutic support and time to gently heal, the Ethiopian government in partnership with international and national NGO’s, in addition addressing the reasons why their citizens are leaving home, need to provide professional care to help the victims overcame such trauma.

Yemeni collusion

The smugglers are organized and well armed, raiding their houses, the Chief of Police for Haradh District that borders Saudi Arabia, where 4,000Ethiopians currently await repatriation, said, Reuters  report, “we face fierce resistance and shootouts. It’s like fighting an insurgency… As long as these people keep arriving the smugglers will keep taking them. There is nothing we can do.” The Yemeni and Ethiopian governments have been discussing ways to present “all facilities required to return the Ethiopian refugees to their home,” said the Yemeni Interior Minister, with standard political ambiguity, failing to mention the brutal criminality taking place inside his country, the security services corruption and the complete lack of police activity to apprehend the smugglers, protect the migrants and bring the trafficking to an end.

The Yemeni authorities shamefully complicit in the violence are portraying Ethiopian and other migrants as the cause of and reason for the increased level of extreme criminality, and as UNHCR report with internal instability giving rise to “reduced police presence…[that is] giving human traffickers and smugglers more room to operate.” And in a sign that suggests further state collusion with criminal gangs, we are informed that police activity “is also frequently preventing patrols along Yemen’s shores by humanitarian teams as they try to reach new arrivals before the smugglers.” Corruption is endemic, with security officials coordinating with smugglers on the border with Saudi Arabia, “a climate of collusion and low political will to apprehend and prosecute smugglers is allowing the trade and abuse of migrants to flourish” (Reuters). The country is run, a military officer on the payroll of the smugglers to the tune of $2,000 a month says, “by tribes not policemen: these people are my friends.” ‘These people’ are turning a blind eye to the murder, rape and trafficking of innocent migrants seeking work to feed their families.

The right to be free and safe

The realization of freedom for the people is the solemn duty of the Ethiopian government, it is the foundation of democracy without which no true and lasting human development will take place, it is however a duty regarded by the TPLF/EPRDF with contempt and disregarded totally. The quest and heartfelt desire of the people of Ethiopia is for social justice and liberty not migration to the Gulf or beyond. They are deeply proud, dignified and many devoutly religious, who love the land of their birth. Overwhelmingly they risk life and limb not in search of material wealth but to escape economic hardship and political imprisonment at the hands of a highly repressive regime that seeks total control and denies all freedom of speech, acknowledged as a human right in the federal constitution.

The political space, narrow in the extreme must be opened, to allow, indeed encourage political and social participation and responsibility. Participation feared only and always by the dictator, would enrich the society, allowing the free flow of ideas to address the many issues facing the country. Such inclusive measures, in keeping with the time and the aspirations of the people would cultivate an atmosphere of hope and strengthen the community. A nationwide programme to raise awareness of the dangers inherent in migration via Yemen and to Gulf countries more broadly, aimed at deterring the unknowing is an imperative responsibility of the government, designed and delivered perhaps in collaboration with international NGO’s working throughout the country, further facilitating involvement and cooperation.

The non-partisan distribution of development aid, an ignored legal requirement, would be a positive step in bringing relief from extreme economic hardship and curtailing migration. Currently, grain fertilizer and food, are selectively distributed by regime stooges based, not on need, but on political affiliation. Ethiopia’s primary donors, America Britain and the European Union, have a responsibility to ensure this is addressed, in addition to insisting the Ethiopian government observes human rights, adheres to federal and international law and dismantles mechanisms of state repression. All such steps would build confidence in change, reducing the need to migrate. Development that does not address humanitarian needs justly, and denies the observation of basic human rights enshrined in law, pollutes the notion of change, allows state corruption and limits government responsibility to the realization of targets set by international institutions seeking to maximize their return and build political/economic models of conformity and control.

In accordance with the responsibilities of office, the Ethiopian government must take all necessary steps to safeguard its citizens. Appropriate consular support is essential in offering protection, advice and sanctuary to migrants, no matter their political affiliation or ethnicity. Urgent, sustained and coordinated efforts are needed by the affected countries law enforcement agencies and judiciary to close down the criminal networks, route out corruption and safeguard migrants. The innocent men women and children from Ethiopia making an impossible choice, with they see no alternatives, are not the villains in this ongoing human tragedy they are the victims trapped in a terrifying nightmare.

አሜሪካ ከጀግኖች አፍሪካውያን ጎን ትቆማለች ?

ከፕሮፌሰር  ዓለማየሁ  ገብረማርያም
ትርጉም  ከነጻነት ለሃገሬ


magl3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ታሪክ ከጀግኖች አፍሪካውያን  ጋር ከወገነ፤  አሜሪካስ  ለምን  አትወግንም ?

ፕሬዜዳንት ኦባማ አክራ፤ ጋናን በ2009 ሲጎበኙ ሁለት አስቸኳይና አስፈላጊ መልዕክቶችን አስተላልፈው ነበር፡፡ ‹‹ታሪክ ከጀግኖች አፍሪካውያን ጋር ወግኗል›› ሲሉ: ለአፍሪካ መሪዎችና ገዢዎች ደግሞ ጠበቅ ያለ መልክት ኣስተላፈው ነበር፡፡

………እንዳትሳሳቱ፡ ታሪክ ወገናዊነቱ ከጀግኖቹ አፍሪካውያን ጋር እንጂ በሥላጣን ላይ እራሳቸውን እንዳነገሱ ለማቆየት መፈንቅለ መንግሥት ከሚያካሂዱ ጋር አለያም ሕገ መንግሥታቸውን እንዳሻቸው ከሚለዋውጡት ጋር አይደለም፡፡ አፍሪካ የሚያስፈልጓት ጡንቻቸው የፈረጠሙ መሪዎች ሳይሆን የዳበሩ ተቋሞች እንጂ … የሕዝቦቻቸውን ፈቃድ ከማያከብሩት እጅጉን በበለጠ  ሕዝባቸውን የሚያከብሩ መንግሥታት የከፍተኛ ሃብታም፤ በጣም የተረጋጉ እና የበለጠ የተዋጣላቸው ይሆናሉ… የልማት መሰረቱ  መልካም አስተዳደር ነው፡፡ በበርካታ ቦታዎች እጅጉን ለረዘመ ብዙ ጊዜ ጎድሎ የነበረው ቅመም ይህ ነው፡፡ ይህ ነው የአፍሪካን እምቅ ችሎታ ሊያወጣው የሚችለው፡፡ ይህም ሃላፊነት በአፍሪካውያን ብቻ ነው ግቡን ሊመታ የሚችለው፡:

ለአፍሪካውያን ህዝቦች የላኩት መልእክት አነሳሽ ተስፋ ሰጪ፤አደፋፋሪ ነበር፡፡

መሪዎቻችሁን በተጠያቂነት ለመያዝና ለሕዝቡ አስፈላጊውን ግልጋሎት የሚሰጡ ተቋማትን ለመገንባት ስልጣኑ አላችሁ፡፡ በመንደራችሁ አገልግሎት መስጠት ትችላላችሁ፤ አቅማችሁንና እውቀታችሁን አዲስ ሃብት መፍጠሪያ፤ ከሌላው ዓለም ጋር መገናኛም ልታደርጉት ትችላላችሁ:: ከመሰረቱ አንስታችሁ የእርስ በርስ ግጭትን፤ በሽታን በማጥፋት  ለውጥ ማምጣት ችላላችሁ፡፡ ያንን ማድረግ ትችላላችሁ፡፡ አዎን ይቻላል! ምክንያቱም በዚህ ሰአት ታሪክ በመገስገስ ላይ ነውና፡፡

ፕሬዜዳንት ኦባማ በተጨማሪም የተከበረና የረጋ ቃል ለአፍሪካ ህዝቦች ገቡ፡

አሜሪካ በማንም ሕዝብ ላይ ምንኛውንም አይነት የመንግስት ስርአት ለመጫን ፍላጎት የላትም፡፡… ማድረግ የምንፈልገው፤ ትኩረታችንን በመልካም አስተዳደር ላይ፤ የስልጣንጣን  መባለግን በሚቆጣጠር  እና ተቃዋሚ ሃይላት ድምጻቸው እንዲሰማ በሚያደርግ፤ የሕግ የበላይነት ለሚያስከብር፤ የፍትሕ ስርአቱን አስተዳደር በእኩል መብት በሚያካፍል፤ የሕዝባዊ ማሕበራት ተሳትፎን በሚያረጋግጥ ፓርላማ ላይ፤ ወጣቱ ትውልድ በስፋት የሚሳተፍበትን በሙስና ላይ ግልጽ አቋም የሚይዝ፤ ከሕጉ ጋር የተያያዘ ቁጥጥር፤ አግልግሎቶችን በማፋጠን፤ ሃላፊነት ለሚሰማቸው ግለሰቦችና ተቋማት፤ ተጠያቂነትንና ግልጽነትን ለሚያረጋግጡ ሁሉ ድጋፋችንን መጨመር ነው እቅዳችን፡፡

አሁን ግልጽ በሆነው የፕሬዜዳንት ኦባማ ሁለተኛው የስልጣን ዘመናቸው ላለፉት ጥቂት ዓመታት ያስተላለፍናቸውን አንዳንድ አስቸጋሪ ጥያቄዎችን ማንሳት ይኖርብናል፡፡ ከ2009 ይልቅ በ2012 በአፍሪካ የበዙ ባለ ጡንቻ መሪዎች አሉ? በየጎዳናውና በየወህኒ ቤቱ ጠንካራ የአፍሪካ ልጆች በ2009 ከነበረው በ2012  ያሉት ኣይበልጡም?  አፍሪካ በ2009 ከነበሯት ደካማ ተቋማት አሁን ያሉት ይበዛሉ? በ2009 ከነበሩት የሕዝባቸውን ፍቃድና ፍላጎት የሚያሟላ የአፍሪካ መሪዎች የበለጡ አሁን አሉ? በአፍሪካ በ2009 ከነበረው የእርስ በርስ ግጭት አሁን ያለው ያንሳል? አሁን አፍሪካ መልካም አስተዳደር አላት? በርካታ የተቃዋሚዎች ድምጽ ይሰማል?  ሕዝባዊ ተሳትፎስ በርክቷል? የወጣቱስ ተሳትፎ በ2009 ከነበረው አሁን ተሸሏል? የታሪክስ ሂደት ወደ ዴሞክራሲ፤ወደ ነጻነት፤ ሰብአዊ ምብት፤በመራመድ ላይ ነው? ወይስ አፍሪካ የኋሊት ፈላጭ ቆራጭነት ወደ ነገሰበት የጭለማው ዘመን፤ ወደ ማን አለብኝነትና የጭቆና አገዛዝ፤ አምባገነናዊ አስተዳደር እየተጓዘች ነው?

አሜሪካ ዛሬ ከጠንካራ አፍሪካውያን ጋር በጥንካሬ ቆማለች ወይስ ከነዚያ አምባገነን ገዢዎች ጋር ተቃቅፋ ኣልጋ ላይ ተጋድማለች?

ፕሬዜዳንት ኦባማ  ሲያነሳሱዋቸው የነበሩት  የአፍሪካ ጀግና ልጆችስ የት ገቡ?

እንደ አሜሪካው ስቴት ዲፓርትመንት የሰብአዊ መብት ትግበራ የ2011 (ሜይ 2012) ዘገባ እነዚያ ፕሬዜዳንት ኦባማ ያሏቸው በርካታ ‹‹ጠንካራ አፍሪካውያን›› አሁን በወህኒ ቤት፤ በመከራ መቀበል፤ በስቃይ በመገረፍ፤ በመለጎም፤ በሽሽት ላይ፤ በሞት በመቀጠፍ፤ አለያም በስጋት ማቅ ተሸፍነው፤ ወከባውን በመሸሽ፤ በዘፈቀደ በየቦታው መያዝን፤ ከፍርድ በፊት በወህኒ መማቀቅን፤ስቃይን፤ ዱላን፤ ኢሰብአዊ  መከራን፤ለሕይወት አስጊ የሆነውን እስራት፤ በንግግ ር ነጻነት መገደብን፤ የፕሬስ ነጻነትን ማጣት፤ ሕገ ወጥ ብርበራን፤ ይህና ሌሎችም መሰል ስቃዮች ናቸው የአፍሪካውያን የእለት ተእለት ሕይወት፡፡ የአፍሪካ ማሕበረሰብና ተቋማት በምግባረ ብልሹ ባለስልጣናት፤ በሙስና፤ ግልጽነት በመጥፋቱ፤በማያስፈልግና ወደኋላ ጎታች፤በሆነ ቢሮክራሲ ማነቆ ተይዘው፤ ማንኛውም ጉዳይ በገዢዎቹ መዋቅር ውስጥ ባሉትና ትዕዛዝ ተቀብለው በሚተነፍሱ፤ በፖለቲካ ቁጥጥር ስር በሆኑ የፍትህ መዋቅሮች፤የተባሉትን ብቻ እሺ በሚሉና በራሳቸው ህሊና በማይገዙና በማይመሩ የፓርላማ አባላት ተከበው በጭለማ ውስጥ በመዳከር ላይ ናቸው፡፡  የአፍሪካውያን ማሕበረሰብ በሚያለያይ በሽታ ተከትበው፤በዘር፤ በነገድ፤ በጎሳ፤ በመንደር፤በጾታ፤ በቋንቋ፤በሃይማኖት፤በባህል፤በወረዳ ተለያይተው ነው ያሉት፡፡

የሰብአዊ መብትን ከሚደፍሩ ሃገራት ሁሉ ድፍረቱ በእጅጉ የበዛባት ሃገር ኢትዮጵያ ነች፡፡ በሜይ 2010 ገዢው ፓርቲ በፓርላማ ካሉት 547 ወንበሮች 545ቱን (99.6%) መቀመጫዎችን ‹‹አሸነፈ››:: በዚያ የምርጫ ወቅት የሁዋይት ሀውስ መግለጫ ያሳየው ጉዳዩ ‹‹አሳሳቢ››  የሚል ነበር:-

ፍትሃዊና ነጻ ምርጫን ለማካሄድ ሁኔታው ከምርጫው ቀናት አስቀድሞም የተመቻቸና ትክክል አልነበረም፡፡ በቅርብ ዓመታት የኢትዮጵያ ገዢ መንግስት የፖለቲካወን ምህዳር በማጥበብ የተቃዋሚዎችን አካሄድም ለመስንከል በማስፈራራትና በማዋከብ፤የራሱን ሜዳ እያሰፋ በማመቻቸት የሲቪክ ማሕበረሰቡን በማግለል፤የነጻ መገናኛ ብዙሃንንም ተግባራቸውንና ክዋኔያቸውን በመቀነጣጠስና በማገድ ላይ የተመሰረተ ነው፡፡ እነዚህ ሁኔታዎች ደግሞ ሃሳብን በነጻ የመግለጽን ሂደት በእጅጉ የሚገድቡ ሲሆኑ ገዢው መንግስት እራሱ ከተቀበለውና ከፈረመው የሰብአዊ መብት ድንጋጌዎች ጋር ጨርሶ የሚጻረርና ተለዋዋጭ ነው፡፡

በኢትዮጵያ ያለው የሰብአዊ መብት ሁኔታ ‹‹ያሳስባል›› ከሚል በጨዋነት ከተሰነዘረው  የበለጠ ግንዛቤ የሚያስፈልገው ነው፡፡ድርጊቱ ቁጣን ሊያጭር ከድርገቱ ጋር ተመጣጣኝ የሆነ ና ከዓለም አቀፍ የሰብአዊ መብት ድንጋጌዎች ጋር የሚዛመድ እንዲሆን ግፊት ያስፈልገዋል፡፡  በቅርቡ በወጣው ኢትዮጵያን የሚመለከተው የዩ ኤስ ስቴት ዲፓርትመንት የሰብአዊ መብት ዘገባ (ሜይ 2012) ‹‹ ከ100 የሚበልጡ የፖለቲካ ሰዎች፤ጋዜጠኞች፤እና የድረገጽ ተሳታፊዎች (በዓለም አቀፍ በተወገዘው የጸረሽብርተኝነት ሕግ) መንግስት የፕሬስን ነጻነት ገደበ፤የመያዝና የመጠቃት ፍርሃት ጋዜጠኞች እራሳቸውን እንዲቆጣጠሩ አስገድዷቸዋል፡፡ የእርዳታና የሰብአዊ ግልጋሎት ሰጪዎች  (CSO law)  አሁንም የጠነከረ እገዳ በማድረግ የማሕበረሰቡና የእርዳታ ሰጪ ድርጅቶች እንቅስቃሴዎች ከመዳከም ወደ መቆም እየተጓዙ ነው፡፡በጣም አሳሳቢ የሚባሉት የሰብአዊ መብት ችግሮች፤ ድብደባን በደህንነት ሰዎች መሰቃየትን፤ወህኒ ማጎርን፤በጣም የተበላሸ የወህኒ ሁኔታን፤ የሴቶችን ሕብረተሰባዊ  ልዩነትን፤…… በጁንና ሴፕቴምበር (2011) የተካሄደው ሁለተኛው ዙር አፈናና እስር፤በርካታ ስመጥር ጋዜጠኞችን፤የፖለቲካ ተቃዋሚ አባላትን፤ንቁ የፖለቲካ ተሳታፊዎችን፤አንዱዓለም አራጌን የአንድነትለፍትሕና ለዴሞክራሲና የመድረክን ፓርቲ ምክትል ሊቀመንበር ጭምር፤ታዋቂውን የድረገጽ ጸሃፊና ተሟጋች እስክንድር ነጋ፤ የአንድነት ለዴሞክራሲና ለፍትሕ አባልን ናትናኤል መኮንንን ያካተተ ነው;;›››››››››

ካረን ጄ ሃንራሃን የዴሞክራሲ ቢሮ፤ የሰብአዊ መብትና የሌበር ዲፒዩቲ ምክትል  ጸሃፊ ለብሔራዊ አንዳውመንት በኦክቶበር 2012 ባደረጉት ንግግር

….በኢትዮጵያ ግብግብ ገጥሞናል፡፡ መሰረታዊው ጥየቄም ገዢው መንግስት በፖለቲካና ማሕበረሰቡ ተቋማት ላይ ጫናውን ሲያበዛና ገደቡ ልክ ሲያጣ፤ዴሞክራሲንና የሰብአዊ መብትን በአግባቡ ማራመድ የሚቻለው እንዴት ተብሎ ነው፡፡ ይህም በሲቪል ማሕበረሱ ላይ የሚደረግ ጫና፤የሜዲያዎች ነጻነት ማጣት፤በጸረ ሽብርተኝነት አዋጅ ሰበብ ጋዜጠኞችን የተቃዋሚ ፓርቲ አባላት አፈናና ማሳደድ፤ለአእስር መዳርግ የሚያካትት ነው፡፡ ወደፊት መራመዱ ለመንግስትም ቢሆን የተቃዋሚዎችንና የሲቪል ሕበረሰቡን እድገት የሚያስከትል ይሆናል፡፡ኢትዮጵያዊያን ዜጎች መብቶቻቸውን ሙሉ በሙሉ ለመጠቀም ማስቻል ብቻ ሳይሆን የአሜሪካንና የኢትዮጵያ መንግስታት ሁለቱም የመረጋጋትና የልማት እድገትና ዋስትና ያገኛሉ፡፡

የአሜሪካን መሪዎች ምናልባትም ቀደም ሲሉ በቦታው ከነበሩትና ከፈላጭ ቆራጭና አምባገነኖች ተመሳሳይ ጥሪ የአሁኖቹ የአሜሪካ መሪዎች ሊማሩ ይችሉ ይሆናል፡፡ አንድ ወቅት ላይ ፕሬዜዳንት ትሩማን እንዳሉት፡‹‹ የተቃዋሚውን የመናገር ነጻነት ለማፈን የቆረጠ መንግስት የጉዞው አቅጣጫ አንድ ብቻ ነው፤ተደራራቢ ወደ ሆነና ለሁሉም ዜጎች የሽብርና ሁሉም በፍርሃት የሚኖርበት አካባቢ እንዲሆን በማድረግ አምቆ የመግዛት ስርአት፤›› ይህ ነው በኢትዮጵያ ያለው የማያከራክርና የማይካድ ሕይወትና ‹‹ጥሪ›› ‹‹አሳሳቢ›› የሚሉ ባዶ ቃላት አንዳችም ፋይዳ ሊናራቸው ሁኔታዎችን ሊቀይሩና የዜጎችን ሕይወት ሊለውጡ አይችሉም!

ዛሬ በአፍሪካ ያለው ያሜሪካ መምሪያ ብዙ ጉድለቶች ኣሉት

በዩ ኤስ ዲፓርትመንት ኦፍ ስቴት የአፍሪካ ጉዳዮች ሃላፊ የሆኑት ጆኒ ካርሰን አባባል  በአፍሪካ ውስጥ ሊያገለግሉ የሚችሉ ‹‹አምስት የአሜሪካንን ፍላጎት የሚያሟሉ ምሶዎች አሉ›› ይህም የሚያካትተው፤ (1) ዴሞክራሲውን የሚያግዙ እና የዴሞክራሲ መዋቅሮችን፤ ነጻ፤ ፍትሃዊና ግልጽ ምርጫዎችን የሚያጠናክሩ፤ (2) የአፍሪካን እድገት ልማት የሚያግዝ፤ (3) ግጭቶችን መከላከል፤ ማቅለል እና ውሳኔዎችን ማስፈጸም (4)ፕሬዜዳንታዊ ጅማሮዎችን እንደ ዓለም አቀፍ የጤና ጅማሮዎችን መደገፍ፤የወደፊቱን መመገብ፤ዓለም አቀፍ የዓየር ንብረትን ጅማሮዎችን መደገፍ (5) ከአፍሪካ ሃገርና ሕዝብ ጋር በሽግግር ሂደቶች ላይ እንደ አደንዛዥ እጽ ቁጥጥርን፤ ሕግ ወጥ የገንዘብ ዝውውርን፤ የሰዎች ሽያጭን›› ያካትታል:: እንደ ካርሰን አባባል ‹‹በአሁኑ ወቅት›› የዩ ኤስ ፖሊሲ በአፍሪካ በኮት ዲ ቩዋር በጊኒ፤በናይጄር፤መንግስታዊ ሰላማዊ ሽግግሮችን ረድቷል፡፡በናይጄርያ የተሳካ ምርጫ እንዲካሄድ አድርጓል፤የደቡብ ሱዳንን ነጻነት አረጋግጧል፡፡ በዴሞክራቲክ ኮንጎም የጾታንና የወሲባዊን ሁከቶችን ለማቆም በንቃት በመንቀሳቀስ ላይና በመካከለኛው አፍሪካ በመላው በመንቀሳቀስ ላይ ያለውን የሎርድ ሬዚስታነስ ሠራዊት ለማክሸፍም በጽናት በመንቀሳቀስ ላይ ነው፡፡ የወደፊቱን መመገብ የሚለው የዩ ኤስ ዓለም አቀፋዊ የምግብ ዋስትና ጅማሮ 12 የአፍሪካ ሃገራትን ያካትታል፡፡

የዩ ኤስ ዲፓርትመንት ኦፍ ስቴት የሰብአዊ መብት ዘገባ (ሜይ 2012)  የሂላሪ ክሊንተን ገለጻ፡ “እንደሃገር አስተዳደሪነቴ በዓለም ዙርያ ባደረግሁት ጉዞ የሰብአዊ መብትን ለማስከበርና የፍትሕና ስርአት ለማስከበር ሲሉ የራሳቸውን ሕይወት ለአደጋ ያጋለጡ በርካታ ሰዎች አጋጥመውኛል፤ በትልቁም ይሁን መጠኑ ባነሰ መልክ መንግስቶቻቸውን ተጠያቂ እንዲሆንና ለዓለም አቀፉ ሰብአዊ መብት ድንጋጌ ተገዢነት ይሞግታሉ፤ ቆራጥነታቸውና ድፍረታቸው ለሰላማዊ  መሻሻል አነሳሥ ነው፡፡ይህ ዘገባ ድፍረትና ጥንካሬያቸውን በሚገባ ዕውቅና በመስጠት እንደማሳሰቢያነትም ያገለግላል፡ ዩናይትድ ስቴትስ ሰብአዊ ክብርን ለማራመድ ከሚጥሩ ጋር አብሮ በመቆም በጥረታቸውም ላይ የዓለም ትኩረትና ድጋፍ ብርሃን እንዲያበራ ከማድረግ አንቆጠብም፡፡”

እነዚህ መጠነኛ ክንዋኔዎች ፕሬዜዳንት ኦባማ ከሰነዘሩዋቸው እነዚያ ግዙፍ፤ ተስፋ ሰጪ ቃላቶች ጋርና አስተዳደራቸው መልካም አስተዳደርንና ሰብአዊ መብትን በማስከበሩ ረገድ በአፍሪካ የተደረገው  ሲመዘን እጅጉን ተራርቀውና በማይመጣጠን ደረጃ ኣንሰው ይገኛሉ፡፡ አሁን ጊዜው ያለፈውን በማንሳት መወነጃጀያ፤ ጥርስ ማፋጪያ፤ ሆድ ማከኪያ፤ እና ጣት መቀሳሰርያ ግዜ አይደለም፡፡ ወደ ፕሬዜዳንታችን የትግል ጥሪ በመመልከትና ትኩረታችንን በማገናኘት ‹‹ወደፊት እንቀጥል›› በማለት የሞረሽ ጥሪ ማድረግ ነው የሚገባን፡፡

አሜሪካኖች በአብዛኛው የሚታወቁበት በቀጥታ አነጋገራቸው አካፋን አካፋ በማለታቸው ነው፡፡ እኔ ዘወትር በተራ አሜሪካውያንና በጥቂት ታላላቅ መሪዎቻቸው የማደንቅላቸው ባሕሪያቸው ነው፡፡የሚሉትን ያደርጋሉ የሚያደርጉትን ይላሉ፡፡ ‹‹ቀጥተኛ ተናጋሪው›› የሚባሉት ፕሬዜዳንት ሃሪ ኤስ ትሩማን ‹‹ለማንም መከራና ስቃይ አልመኝም፡፡ እውነቱን በምናገርበት ጊዜ እነሱ ግን መከራ ነው ይላሉ::›› ስለዚህም እኔም ትንሽ ቀጥተኛ ንግግር አደርገ ለሁ፡፡ ስለ ሰብአዊ መብት ጉራና እወጃ በቂ ያህል ሰምተናል፡፡ የአፍሪካን የሰብአዊ መብት ችግር ስለ መቅረፍ፤ በአፍሪካ መልካም አስተዳደርን ስለመገንባት ‹‹ስለ ግጥሚያው ጥሪ ወይም ስለፍላጎት ቅስቀሳው›› ‹‹ችግሮች‹› ‹‹አከራካሪ ጉዳይነት›› ስለሁሉም ርዕሶች በሚገባ እናውቃለን፡፡ በዲያስፖራው ኢትዮጵያዊያንም አሜሪካ መልካም አስተዳደርን ለማስፈንና ዴሞክራሲና ሰብአዊ መብትን ለማረጋገጥ ስላደረገውና ሳያደርገው በቸልታ ስለታለፈው፤ በቂ ጉርምርምታም፤ መነጫነጭ፤እንዲሁም ምሬት በበቂ አድምጠናል፡፡ ከእንግዲ ምንም የጎንዮሽ ንግግር አያስፈልግም ግልጡን በቀጥታ እና ቀጥተኛ የሆነ ድርጊት ማሳየት ብቻ ነው፡፡ በፕሬዜዳንት ኦባማ ሁለተኛ የስልጣን ዘመን፤በአፍሪካ መልካም አስተዳደርንና ሰብአዊ መብትን በሚገባ ተግባራዊ ለማድረግ ሁለት ምርጫዎች ብቻ ናቸው ያሉት፤ በቃን ብሎ በቁርጥ ‹‹ብድግ‹‹ : አለያም  እጅን  ኣጣጥፎ ኣፍን ለጉሞ ጭጭ በማለት ነው:: በሌላ አነጋገር: አሜሪካ ቆርጦ ከጠንካራዎቹ አፍሪካውያን ጋር በመቆም ትልቅነቱን ያስመሰክራል::  ካልሆነ ደግሞ ተሸመድምዶ በመድከም በ ምጽዋት፤በዓለም ባንክ፤ በአይ ኤም ኤፍ ገንዘብና ብድር በአፈሙዝ ሃይል ሥላጣን ይዘው ከሚገዙት ከጨካኞቹ ፈላጭ ቆራጭ የአፍሪካ መሪዎች ጋር ተቃቅፎ በውርደት መጋደም ነው፡፡

ጀግኖች  ኢትዮጵያውያን  መርጃው መንገድ፡ የት  ይጀመር?

በርካታ ልምድ ያካበቱት ኢትዮጵያዊያን ሰብአዊ መብት ተሟጋቾች ኤች አር 2003ን  (“Ethiopia Democracy and Accountability Act of 2007”) በሚገባ ያስታውሱታል፡፡ያ የሕግ ረቂቅ በኣመሪካን ምክር  ቤት ቀርቦ ነበር፡፡ (H.R. 4423 “Ethiopia Consolidation Act of 2005”) በቅድሚያ በኮንግሬስማን በኒው ጀርሲው ክሪስ ስሚዝ የአፍሪካን የውጭ ጉዳይ ንዑስ ኮሚቴ በሚመሩበት ጊዜ የቀረበ ነው፡፡(ረቂቁ ቆየት ብሎ  በውጭ ጉዳይ ኮሚቴ H.R. 4423 and H.R. 5680 ብሎ ተሰይሞ ነበር፡፡) በ2007 የኒው ጀርሲው ኮንግሬስማን ዶናልድ ፔይን የኮሚቴው ሰብሳቢ ሲሆኑ ጉዳዩን ተረክበው  የ85 የኮንግሬስ አባላትን ድጋፍ ለማግኘት ችለዋል፡፡ ረቂቁ በ2007 የቤቱን ድጋፍ ቢያገኝም ወደ ሴኔት ቀርቦ ድምጽ ሊያገኝ አድል ኣልነበረዉም፡፡ በረቂቁ ሕግ ውስጥ በርካታ ለመልካም አስተዳደር፤ ለተጠያቂነት፤ ስለሰብአዊ መብት መከበረና መረጋገጥ፤ ስለዴሞክራሲ፤ ስለፍትህ መከበርና ስለ ሕግ የበላይነት ስለነጣ የፍትህ ስርአት፤ ስለፍትህ ባለሙያዎች ስልጠና፤ስለምርጫ ቦርድ ነጻና ገለልተኛ መሆንና ሌሎችንም አስፈላጊ የሆኑ ሕዝባዊና ሃገራዊ ጉዳዮችን ያቀፈ ነበር፡፡

የኢትጵያን ‹‹ማግኒቲስኪ  ሕግ”  

ፕሬዜዳንት ኦባማ በ2009 በአክራ ባደረጉት ንግግር አፍሪካውያን ‹‹በሽታንና አለመግባባትን ሊያሸንፉ፤ከመሰረቱ ጀምሮ ወደ ላይ ለውጥ ማምጣት ይችላሉ፡፡ ማድረግ ትችላላችሁ፡፡ ምክንያቱም በዚህ ሰአት ታሪክ እየገሰገሰ ነው›› አዎን ትችላላችሁ ብለው ለኣፍሪካኖች ተናግረው ነበር፡፡ የኢትዮጵያ ሰብአዊ መብቶች ሕግ በአሜሪካ ኮንግሬስ ማለፍ የሚገባው አሁን ነው፡፡በሁለቱም ወገኖች የፓርቲ አሰላለፍ በኩል ስምምነቱ አለና፡፡ በዴሞክራቶችም ሆነ በሪፓብሊካንስ የሰብአዊ መብት ጉዳይ ቅድሚያ የአየተሰተጠው ነዉ፡፡ የማግኒቲስኪ ሕግ ተብሎ ኣዲስ የዎጣው አመላከችና  ፈር ቀዳጅ የሆነ የሰብአዊ መብትን መደፈር የሚያስከብር ድንጋጌ ነው፡፡ይህን ሕግ በቅድሚያ ያነሱትና ያቀረቡት እንዲሁም በተዘዋዋሪ መልክ ድጋፋቸውንና በመጨረሻም ድምጻቸውን በመስጠት ያሳለፉት ሊመሰገኑ የሚገባቸው ናቸው፡፡ (* የለነገሩ ኦባማ አስተዳደር የንግዱን ሕግና የሰብአዊ መብቱን ድንጋጌ ማቀላቀል አያስፈልግም  የሚል አቋም ቢይዝም በመጨረሻው ላይ ግን ተስማምቷል::)

“የማግኒቲስኪ ሕግ”  በጣም ከፍተኛ የሆነ የሪፓብሊካኖች ድጋፍ ነበረው፡፡ የሪፓብሊካኑ አሪዞና ሴኔተር ጆን ማኬይን ‹‹ ስለማግኔቲስኪ ግፍና በደል ለመናገር፤ እንዲሁም ሌሎችም አሁን በሕይወት ያሉና በሩስያ ወህኒ ቤቶች አለ አግባብ በመሰቃየት ላይ ስላሉት መታገልና ለነጻነታቸው መቆም  አሜሪካ የሞራል ግዴታ አለበት››  በማለት አሳስበዋል፡፡ ‹‹ለቭላድሚር ፑቲንና ለሩስያ የሰርቆት መንግስት እንዲህ አይነቱ ኢሰብአዊ ድርጊትና የዜጎች በተለያየ መልኩ መብቶች መገፈፍና ለእስር መዳረግ፤ በወህኒ ስቃይ ማየትን እኛ አሜሪካውያን ልንቀበለው የሚገባን አለመሆኑን የምናሳውቅበት ነው፡፡ ይህ ሕግ ደግሞ ጸረ ሩስያ አይደለም፡፡ይልቅስ ሩስያን ደጋፊ ሕግ ነው:: እኔ ስለነሱ ግፍ ስተፈጸመባቸው እጨነቃለሁ፤በጸሎቴም አስባቸዋለሁ፡፡›› የአሪዞናው ሴኔተር ጆን ማኬን፤ ይህ ሕግ በሁሉም ሃገራት ላይ ተፈጻሚ ሊሆን ይገባል፡፡ የዴሞክራቲኩ ኒው ሃምፕሻየር ሴኔተር ጂያን ሻሂን አሜሪካ በሁሉም ቦታዎች ስለሰብአዊ  መብት ትኩረት ያደርጋል፤ ‹‹ስለ ሃገራቸው የሙስና ዝቅጠት ደፍረው ከሚናገሩት ጋር አብረን እንቆማለን፤ ይህ ሕግ በዓለም ላይ ላሉት ማግኒቲሰኪዎች ሁሉ ነው፡፡›› ሕጉ በዓለም አቀፍ ሁሉ እንደ ምሳሌ የሚወሰድ ነውና በየትም ቦታ እንደሚከበር እምነት አለኝ፡፡ ሁዋይት ሀውስም በዚህ ጉዳይ ላይ መግለጫ አውጥቶ ፕሬዜዳንቱ እንደሚፈርሙት ጠቁሟል፡፡  ‹‹አስተዳደሩ በሩስያ የዴሞክራሲ እውነታና የህግን የበላይነት ለማረጋገጥ ከሚሹና በዓለም አቀፍ ደረጃም እውን እንዲሆን ከሚጥሩ ከኮንግሬስና ከአጋሮቻችን ጋር መስራቱን ይቀጥላል›› ብለዋል ኦባማ::

ማግኒትኪ የሩስያ መሪዎች ሙስና ያጋለጠ ወጣት ጠበቃ ነበር፥ በዚህ ምክኒያት ባለስጣኖችጭ ኣስረው ኣሰቃይተው በስር ገደሉት:: የየሩስያ ፕሬዜዳንቱ ነጻ ካውንስል ለሲቪል ማሕበረሰብ ልማትና ሰብአዊ መብት ዋስትና በደረሰበት ማጣራት መሰረት፤ የማግኒቲስኪ ተይዞ መታሰር ከሕግ ውጪ የተፈጸመ መሆኑን አረጋግጧል፡፡  የፍርድ ቤቱ ሂደትም ማግኒቲስኪ በሩስያ ፌዴሬሽን ፍትህ በፍርድ ቤቱ፤ በአቃቤ ሕጉ፤ እንደተነፈገውና ምርመራ የተካሄደበትም በስርቆት በወነጀላቸውና ማንነታቸውን ይፋ ባወጣባቸው ግለሰቦች ነበር፡፡ በእስር ላይ በነበረበት ጊዜም አስፈላጊ የሆነውን የህክምና እርዳታ እንዳያገኝ ሆኖ በ8 የወህኒ ቤቱ ጠባቂዎች በመጨረሻው የሕይወቱ ሰአት በግፍ እንደተደበደበ ተገሎኣል፡፡ ድርጊቱንም ባለስላጣናቱ ከመካዳቸውም ባሻገር አንዳቸውም በድርጊታቸው የተነሳ ለጥያቄ እንኳን ወደ ፍርድ ቤት አልቀረቡም፡፡

ፍትሕን ተነፍገው በወህኒ በመሰቃየት ላይ ያሉ በርካታ ‹‹ኢትዮጵያዊያን ማግቲሰኪዎች›› አሉ፡፡ በ2005 በተካሄደው ምርጫ ወቅት ባዶ እጃቸውን ዴሞክራሲንና ሰብአዊ መብትን ለማስከበር ገዢው መንግስት እራሱ ያጸደቀውን ሕገ መንግስት እንዲከበር ለመጠየቅ ሰላማዊ ሰልፍ ያደረጉትን ንጹሃን 200 ዜጎች በፖሊስና በደህንነት አባላት ከቀድሞው ጠቅላይ ሚኒስትር በተሰጠ ቀጥታ ትዕዛዝ በጥይት ተደብድበው መሞታቸውና ከ800 የማያንሱት በጠና መቁሰላቸው ተረጋግጦ እያለ፤ ይ ህንንም  በቀጥታና በተዘዋዋሪ የፈጸሙት ይከበርልኝ የዜግነት ክብሬ አይደፈር በማለቱ የተፈጸመበት የሰብአዊ መብት መገርሰስ ዓልም ሊፋረደው የሚገባ እንጂ በሕግ ማውጣትና በማስፈራራት ብቻ ሊታለፍ የሚገባው ሊሆን አይገባም፡፡ የነዚህና የሌሎችም በግፍ የተገደሉና ለመከራ የተዳረጉ ኢትዮጵያዊያን ድምጽ ከያሉበት ከፍ ብሎ ይጣራልና ሰሚ ሊያጣ አይገባውም፡፡

በዩ ኤስ ኮንግሬስ ለውጥ ማየት ታላቅ ደስታ ነው፡፡ በሰብአዊ መብትና በመልካም አስተዳደር አዲስ አስተሳሰብና አመለካከት ያለ ይመስላል:: እነዚህ ሁነቶችም የዓለም አቀፉ ድንጋጌዎችና የሰለጠነ ሕብረተሰብ አንድ አካል ናቸው፡፡ ለምንግስት ብቻ ሊተው የሚገባም አይደለም››:: ሰብአዊ መብት የሁሉም ሰብአዊ ፍጡር የጋራ ጉዳይ ነው፡፡ለሩስያው ጀግና  ሰርጂ ማግኒቲስኪ ጥሩ የሆነው  ህግ ለኢትዮጵያዊያኖቹ ጀግኖች ለ 16 ዓመቱ መለስካቸው አላምነውም ፤ ለ22 ዓመቱ ሃድራ ኦስማንም፤፤ለ50 ዓመቷ እቴነሽ ይማምም፤ለ23 ዓመቱም ቴዎድሮስ ግደይ፤ ለ24 ዓመቱም ጋሻው ሙሉጌታ፤ለ21 ዓመቱም ሌቺሳ ፋታሳም…..  በግፍ የተገደሉ ሰማታት ተገቢ ነው፡፡

ፕሬዜዳንት ኦባማ በ2009 በአክራ ‹‹አሜሪካ ራዕዩን (መልካም አስተዳደርና ሰብአዊ መብት መከበርን) በቃላት ብቻ ሳይሆን የአፍሪካን አቅም ሊያጠናክር በሚገባ መልኩ የማሻሻልና ቅድሚያ የመስጠት ሃላፊነት አለበት፡፡ በሞስኮ የዓለምአቀፋዊ የሰብአዊ መብት ድንጋጌዎች ሊከበሩ የሚገባበት ማስገደጃዎች ሊኖሩ እንደሚገባና እነዚህ ድንጋጌዎች መፋለስም እንደሌለባቸው በማሳሰብ ንግግር አድረጌያለሁ፡፡›› ብለው ነበር፡፡ ታሪክ በሂደት ላይ ነው! ‹‹የኢትዮጵየዊያን ማግኒቲስኪ ሕግ›› ሊኖረን ተገቢ ነው፡፡ይህም ከወዳጆቻችንና አጋሮችቻን በምናገኘው ትንሽ ድጋፍ እውን ይሆናል!

በትክክለኛው የአፍሪካ የሰብአዊ መብት ጎን መቆም ማለት በትክክለኛው የታሪክ ጎን መቆም ማለት ነው፡፡

ፕሮፌስር ዓለማየሁ ገብረማርያም በካሊፎርኒያ ስቴት ዩኒቨርሲቲ ሳን በርናርዲኆ የፖሊቲካ ሳይንስ መምሀርና የህግ ጠበቃ ናችው።

*የተቶረገመው ጽሁፍ (translated from):

http://open.salon.com/blog/almariam/2012/12/15/will_the_us_stand_by_the_side_of_brave_africans

(ይህን ጦማር ለሌሎችም ያካፍሉ::) ካሁን በፊት የቀረቡ የጸሃፊው ጦማሮችን  ለማግኘት እዚህ ይጫኑ::

http://www.ecadforum.com/Amharic/archives/category/al-mariam-amharic

http://ethioforum.org/?cat=24

 

16 European Parliament members sent a letter to PM Hailemairma Desalegn asking him to free Eskinder Nega

Today, 16 members of the European Parliament issued a public letter to Ethiopian Prime Minster Hailemariam Desalegn expressing their grave concern regarding the continued detention of imprisoned journalist and blogger Eskinder Nega.

Arrested in 2011 and detained without access to an attorney for nearly two months, Mr. Nega was sentenced to 18 years in prison under the country’s broad 2009 Anti-Terrorism Proclamation on July 13, 2012. Mr. Nega’s arrest and prosecution came after he wrote online articles and spoke publicly about the possibility of an Arab Spring-like movement taking place in Ethiopia. After his sentencing, the government initiated proceedings to seize his assets, including the home still used by his wife and young son. An appeal hearing in the case is scheduled for Wednesday, December 19th.

The letter, notes that the Ethiopian government has an obligation to uphold the right to free expression and reminds the newly appointed Prime Minister that he has “the unique opportunity to lead Ethiopia forward on human rights and bring the country fully within the community of nations.” The letter closes by urging the Prime Minister to take all measures within his power “to facilitate the immediate and unconditional release of Mr. Nega.”

“This is an important recognition by members of the European Parliament from across the political spectrum that the right to free expression is universal and must be respected by the Ethiopian government,” said Freedom Now Executive Director Maran Turner. “Mr. Nega has been wrongfully detained in Ethiopia in violation of his right to freedom of expression, and he must be released.”

The text of the letter is copied below and a full PDF of the letter can be found at the below link. Freedom Now, a legal advocacy organization that represents prisoners of conscience around the world, serves as international pro bono counsel to Mr. Nega.

Source: Freedom Now

###

Dear Prime Minister Desalegn,

We write to express our grave concern regarding the continued detention of independent Ethiopian journalist and blogger Eskinder Nega and urge you to facilitate his immediate release.

Mr. Nega, a longtime publisher and journalist, was arrested in 2011 and charged under the country’s 2009 Anti-Terror Proclamation after he wrote and spoke publicly about the Arab-Spring movements then unfolding across the Middle East and North Africa. Although clearly sympathetic, Mr. Nega consistently emphasized that any similar movements in Ethiopia must remain peaceful. Despite this, the government of your predecessor Prime Minister Meles Zenawi arrested Mr. Nega, held him without access to family for nearly one month and without access to an attorney for nearly two months, and ultimately sentenced him to 18 years in prison. Even now, reports indicate that proceedings are underway to seize Mr. Nega’s home, where his wife and young son continue to live.

Unfortunately, Mr. Nega is not alone—journalists Woubshet Taye and Reyot Alemu have also received long prison sentences on terror charges. In response to your government’s use of the 2009 Anti-Terror Proclamation against journalists and opposition leaders, the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, and five United Nations Special Rapporteurs—including the Special Rapporteur on counter-terrorism and human rights—have all expressed alarm at this worrying trend. As some have noted, the use of vague anti-terror legislation to silence legitimate expression threatens to seriously undermine the credibility of efforts to address real security threats to the region.

It is our understanding that appeal proceedings in Mr. Nega’s case are ongoing and we respect your need to allow the judicial process to continue. However, it is also your government’s obligation to respect the right to freedom of expression as established under customary international law and codified in Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which Ethiopia is a party.

You now have the unique opportunity to lead Ethiopia forward on human rights and bring the country fully within the community of nations. As such, we urge you to take all measures within your power to facilitate the immediate and unconditional release of Mr. Nega.

Sincerely,

Alexander Graf Lambsdorff
Ana Gomes
Charles Tannock
Eduard Kukan
Eija-Riitta Korhola
Emilio Menendez del Valle
Fiona Hall
Frank Engel
Kinga Gál
Laima Liucija Andrikienė
Maria Da Graça Carvalho
Mariya Gabriel

96 Ethiopians arrested in northern Tanzania

GLOBAL TIMES — Tanzanian authorities on Monday said that 96 Ethiopians who were found hiding in villages near Kenya boarder.

According to immigration officers, the Ethiopians were arrested on Sunday morning when they were found in a lorry in an area located between Ngeriani and Tingatinga villages in the district waiting to cross Tanzania to one of the southern African countries.

Arusha Regional Immigration Officer Daniel Namomba said the Ethiopians were expected to be taken to court on Monday after long interrogations with immigration officers at Namanga Immigration border post.

He said four Tanzanians, who facilitated the “dirty game,” were also arrested and taken to court to face charges leveled against them.

This occurred few days after 13 Ethiopians, en-route to South Africa, were arrested in Arusha while hiding in a house owned by a taxi driver.

Namomba explained the arrest of the aliens has been possible through collaboration with local Samaritans, immigration officers and wildlife rangers in the area.

He said the problem is getting more complicated as stowaways use illegal routes popularly known as “panya route” to get into Tanzania.

“These people were on transit to one of the southern African countries on the way to European countries and the United States,” he said.

The immigrants were found in a lorry with registration numbers T264 APV, owned by someone identified as Said Augustino Mrembe, a Kilimanjaro-based resident, he said, adding all of them were in good conditions.

The recent Southern African Development Community (SADC) report showed Tanzania is a gate way for illegal immigrants wishing to go to southern African countries especially South Africa.