Skip to content

Author: Elias Kifle

Ethiopians in Israel

By Donald N Levine

For all the talk about ethnic self-determination in Ethiopia, almost no attention has been paid to the one and only ethnic group that actually seceded from Ethiopia–the Beta Israel, formerly called Falasha, whose entire population left the country. The story of their secession is full of drama, intrigue, suffering, and jubilation–and, like so much else about Ethiopia, fraught with misunderstandings.

One account of their exodus, which I once believed, was that their departure was instigated from outside pressures, most notably from the American Jewish community. Stephen Spector’s meticulously researched Operation Solomon (2005) clarifies the matter decisively, locating the real impetus in the religious motives of the Beta Israel themselves. Spector and other sources demonstrate that during the mid-1970s, once Israel’s two chief rabbis of Israel declared the Beta Israel authentic Jews, they experienced a heightened yearning to emigrate to the Land of Israel. How they strove to realize that yearning offers yet another testimony to the religiosity, hardiness, determination–and love of pilgrimage–that characterize Ethiopians of many regions.

Ethiopians of the North long regarded the Holy Land as an alluring beacon. Ethiopian Christians refer to themselves as deqiqa israel, children of Israel; Ethiopians were among the earliest immigrant groups to settle in Jerusalem. Legend is that the Lalibela churches were constructed to enable Ethiopian Christians to have an awesome destination once the route to Jerusalem was hampered by the Arab conquests. Years ago, I spoke with a group of resident monks in Jerusalem and asked if they did not miss their homeland: “Sela-agaratchew nafqot albezabatchihum?” “Inday!” they replied, “izih new agaratchn!” (What do you mean? Our homeland is right here!)

Visiting Jerusalem this year, however, I learned of two points Ethiopian Christians were in trouble. One concerns the decision of authorities not to grant asylum to some seventy illegal Christian immigrants. They were detained in prison for two years until a court accepted the UNHCR judgment that their appeal for asylum based on fear of personal persecution in Ethiopia was not well founded. Under pressure from local Ethiopians, the Government of Israel stayed their deportation until the Canadian Embassy issued invitation letters for them to be interviewed.

More serious is current litigation over Ethiopia’s age-old proprietary claims to a small enclave on the roof of the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, Deir es-Sultan (Eth. Debra Sultan). Thanks to their long presence in Jerusalem, from not long after their Christianization in the 4th century CE, Ethiopians acquired rights to some of Christianity’s most sacred sites. These rights were attested repeatedly by European visitors through the Middle Ages, one reporting in the late 14th century that Ethiopians possessed four different chapels in the Church of the Holy Sepulcher. Even so, after Salahadin conquered Jerusalem in 1187 and assigned Ethiopia’s rights to Egyptian Copts, those claims were contested repeatedly. Subsequent competition with diverse Christian nationals–Armenians, Greeks, and Copts–made it difficult for Ethiopians to hold on to those rights. Skirmishes with Egyptians during the two centuries after 1770 took away nearly all Ethiopian property. After the Six-Day War in June 1967, Ethiopians had to evacuate an old monastery near the Jordan, and rejoined their old compatriots at Deir es-Sultan just after it was evacuated by panicking Egyptian Coptic monks–all except their determined archbishop, who stayed only to be manhandled by the tough Ethiopians. That was a retribution of sorts for the episode when Copts threw stones at the Ethiopian Easter celebration on the roof; Israeli authorities changed locks of the two chapels and handed Ethiopians the keys. Still, vicissitudes of relations among Egypt, Ethiopia, and Israel continue to jeopardize Ethiopian rights to the site; at the moment, the case is still before the Israeli High Court.

Most Ethiopians fail to grasp the significance of this monastery for their nation–so argues Daniel Alemu, a young Ethiopian scholar in Jerusalem. Yet if Badme is significant for Ethiopia, he says, Deir es-Sultan is far more integral to Ethiopian history and national identity. It also symbolizes the deep religiosity often attributed to Ethiopians of all faiths; only the unbounded devotion that Ethiopians have for this
ancient holy site enables them to manifest the strength and tolerance needed to live for centuries under inhuman conditions in a collapsing monastery.

The attachment of Christian Ethiopians to the Holy Land pales next to that of their Beta Israel kinsmen. So deep was the Falashas’ historic identification with their Hebraic roots that they created an annual holiday, Sigd, when they climb a mountain and recite the Ten Commandments in honor of Moses on Mt. Sinai. All the Ethiopian olim (immigrants) whom Spector interviewed mentioned this as their primary motive. He quotes an elderly qes (Jewish priest): “Our ancestors all hoped and prayed that they themselves would make it to Jerusalem. They did not make it. We are on the brink of reaching Zion.” This evidence contradicts stories circulated in the West to arouse sympathy and donations, stories disconfirmed by those on the ground. Ethiopian officials, U.S. Government officials, and American relief agencies alike affirm that Falasha did not leave because of famine, warfare, disease, or persecution by Christians. Many Christians pleaded with them not to go, while others felt sympathy for their outpouring of collective devotion, including Berhanu Yiradu, who chaired a committee in Gondar working to expedite the movement to Addis; Dr. Girma Tolossa, who represented the Jewish Joint Distribution Committee in Addis; and an Ethiopian Christian priest who rented his large compound there to camp the Falasha migrants.

The dream of Zion drove Beta Israel to a via dolorosa into Sudan in the years after 1977 when the Derg halted emigration to Israel. Huge numbers made a long, dangerous trek across the desert, usually at night, in which thousands died dreadful deaths along the way. Once there, many more died in pestilential refugee compounds. Their tragic situation aroused the concern of people in Canada, the U.S. and Israel, after which the ministrations of outside supporters from North America and Israel were indispensable. Israeli Defense Forces began heroic efforts to locate and transport the survivors to Israel–efforts that culminated in Operation Moses of late 1984 when they brought some 6500 Falashas to Israel. When that was exposed in the Sudanese Press, it had to be discontinued. President Nimeiri was deposed, and the new regime imprisoned or executed Sudanese thought to have assisted those rescues. Even after that, Israelis rescued a couple thousand more from Sudan. All told, some twenty thousand Beta Israel left Ethiopia by way of Sudan, of whom about four thousand perished before reaching their destination.

By 1989, nearly half the recognized Falasha community had reached Israel. This fired a constant demand for family reunification, which led eventually to Israel’s agreeing to let some 27,800 more Ethiopian come between 1990 and 1992. The climactic highlight was the remarkable Operation Solomon in which 14,300 Beta Israel were evacuated during a daring 36-hour airlift in late May 1991. A recent Jerusalem Post
article includes Operation Solomon among the most memorable noble achievements in Israel’s modern history, alongside the Six-Day War and the rescue at Entebbe.

By now, numbering at 100,000 to two per cent of the Jewish population of Israel, Ethiopians comprise a larger percentage of the population there than of any other state outside of Ethiopia. Their adjustment problems have been amplified by having to leap from a largely rural subsistence lifestyle into the lifestyle of modern cities, to learn a difficult new language, and to be absorbed in such large numbers in a short time. Much has been made of stories about their maladjustment: reported high rates of divorce, school dropouts, and suicide. For some, the cultural rift proved catastrophic. “On the day I set foot in Israel,” one Ethiopian man said, “my life came to an end.” A great deal of the Ethiopian Jewish community lives below the poverty line in depressed neighborhoods. A disproportionate number are unemployed, since they lack skills appropriate to work in a modern economy. Some claim to have been excluded from schools or jobs on racial grounds.

On the other hand, the Beta Israel of Ethiopia were treated with better accommodations and services than any other immigrant group in Israel’s history. A recent survey showed that although their poverty level was higher than any other immigrant group, so was their level of satisfaction with life in the Promised Land. A decent number have made positive adjustments, becoming army officers, small businessmen, and successful candidates for city councils. Above all, from the viewpoint
of the olim, coming to the Promised Land was the fulfillment of a culture’s dream.

The situation is more ambiguous for several thousands of other Ethiopians who attempt to follow the trail of their Jewish countrymen. These people claim to be relatives of those already in Israel or to be converts to Christianity; the Hebrew name for them, Falasmura, signifies “Falashas who converted.” Their case has been championed by the North American Conference on Ethiopian Jewry (NACOEJ), an organization that sprang up in the 1980s to assist the Falasha immigrants, but was scarcely known in Israel before the completion of Operation Solomon in 1991. At that point the head of the Jewish Agency announced that except for a few hundred souls, the aliyah of Ethiopia’s Jews had reached a successful completion. The chief charitable organization for the Falasha, the American Association for Ethiopian Jews, closed down its American operation and all of its work in Ethiopia. NACOEJ seized the opportunity to establish itself in Addis as advocate for those refused entry to the airplanes of Operation Solomon because they were known to be converts to Christianity–hence, according to the clear guidelines of the Law of Return, not eligible to come on aliyah.

After 1991 NACOEJ assumed jurisdiction over the 3000 or so Falasmura in Addis and sent agents to villages south of Gondar to recruit groups of Ethiopian Orthodox Christians who in one way or another recalled that their ancestors had been Falashas. The new migrants needed little encouragement; they streamed into Addis Ababa en masse, before long swelling the total arrivals to 50,000. NACOEJ lobbies in Israel and in the States became influential; they readily enlist the support of the Black Caucus as well as the United Jewish Communities if Israel makes any move that seems detrimental to the “Jews” languishing in Ethiopia. Although the group has now been thrown out of Ethiopia, it still works behind the scenes to support those thousands of expectant Ethiopians who anticipate eventually being brought to Israel. Processing all those hopefuls and new immigrants has become what some call a racket. The large reservoir of potential immigrants get encouragement both from their relatives who are already in Israel and from the tireless efforts of a NACOEJ-affiliated Ethiopian, Avraham Beyene, whose organization, which seeks to bring all the Falasmura to Israel, is based in Jerusalem. Paradoxically, Ato Avraham’s own Falasha ancestors were among those who early on converted to Christianity, and he, prior to his aliyah, had worked in Gondar under the auspices of the London Missionary Society for the Conversion of the Jews.

The Falasmura story threatens to override what was a narrative of triumph with a troubling denouement. Ethiopians who arrived since the early 1990s, despite their announced conversions to Judaism, keep distant from the Jewish life of the genuine Falasha community. They have become an increasing burden on the limited resources of the Israeli Government. They incite political opportunists to accuse the Government of racism by not admitting more Ethiopians, just as earlier ideologues accused Israel of racism by importing settlers from Africa.

The genuine Falasha exodus continues to have repercussions. Their departure had costs. It robbed Ethiopia of an important part of her history, a part to which recent scholarship has brought fresh attention. It deprived Israel of the only indigenous Jewish community left in the African Continent. It deprived Gondares of close friends and neighbors. (Indeed, some Gondares have come to feel guilty about how they mistreated the Falashas before their departure and wish to make amends by providing favorable conditions for their return.) And it stripped Falasha culture of its traditional moorings and accessories–ritual objects, prayerbooks, idiosyncratic monastic traditions.

On the other hand, Operations Moses and Solomon saved a distinctive branch of Judaism for the world. Ethiopianist Chaim Rosen notes that “there are perhaps one hundred Falasha priests still functioning in Israel, with many followers, and determinedly passing their tradition down to their sons. So the unique Beta Israel religion remains alive in Israel, and has been preserved there perhaps even more than in it might have been in Ethiopia, where it could have faded away like the Qemant religion.”

What is more, as I wrote in my IJES article, “Reconfiguring the Ethiopian Nation in a Global Era,” there is a sense in which Ethiopians in the Diaspora can and do continue to be an integral part of the Ethiopian nation. They can and do engage from afar, through visits, through the internet, and sometimes by repatriation. Some envisage channels through which Israeli Ethiopians can begin to connect back with the motherland, just like other Diaspora Ethiopians who return for limited times or for good. Falashas are learning skills that can be put to good use in Ethiopia’s development. They and fellow Israelis can harness the experience of Israelis in turning deserts into gardens, and fructify areas like the Ogaden and the their homelands in the northwest. The Ethiopian Government has broached the idea of offering fellowships at Ethiopian universities for Ethiopians in Israel. The prospect of offering Ethiopian Israelis a chance to renew ties to their other motherland offers opportunities for all concerned after the trials and tribulations of the past few decades.

A make-or-break-weekend for the Kinijit political leadership

Ethiopian Review Editorial

Representatives of Kinijit support committees through out the United States will come to Washington DC for a conference this coming weekend, August 18-19, 2006. The meeting was called by the chairman of the Kinijit North America Support Committee (KNASC) at the urging of some local support committee representatives who are opposing the newly formed Kinijit International Political Leadership. The majority of the executive committee members had objected to holding the conference, arguing that the International Leadership (IL) must first get itself organized and become fully functional. But the KNASC chairman decided to call a conference, brushing off the majority’s concern.

The purpose of the conference was to reject the IL, if possible, or to make the KNASC independent of the political leadership so that its officials can continue to do what ever they choose to do without any accountability. Most of these local representatives have either appointed themselves or were appointed by some of the KNASC officials. Many of them have no formal structure. They are a one-man show. Not surprisingly, most of the problems inside the KNASC are caused by these unelected so-called “representatives.” Because their loyalty is to the individuals inside the KNASC who appointed them, not the Kinijit members in their local areas. They feel accountable to no one. Those local committees that have duly elected their representatives, such as Washington DC, Boston, Atlanta, and a few others, are the most active and problem-free. Even though this weekend’s conference was called with the intention of sabotaging the IL, it is a good opportunity for the IL to take decisive measures in asserting its leadership over these unruly elements. If it cannot do that, it will be the start of its undoing.

The Kinijit IL finally moving forward
After receiving a great deal of criticism for lack of action, finally this week the IL has started to take some decisive actions through a democratic decision-making process. First, the IL has finally decided to disassociate the party from its hijacked web site (kinijit.org), after attempts failed to persuade the hijackers to return the site to the public relations committee. On Tuesday, the IL released a timely and important message directed at the armed forces in Ethiopia. The IL has also been able to finally focus on securing the release of the jailed Kinijit leaders. This has been a very productive week for the IL indeed. While the power-mongers are busy conspiring against it, the IL was attending to the business of the party, at the same time taking actions against those who have paralyzed Kinijit for the past several months.

Necessary measures
One of the proposed solutions to bring order back to Kinijit is to disband the current KNASC and replace it with a body that is composed of elected representatives from local committees. Those representatives who are not democratically elected by their local committees must be given a short deadline to conduct elections in their respective localities. The IL has the mandate and authority to take such measures.

Another important step is to separate the IL and the KNASC’s new leadership and strictly limit the KNASC’s role to mobilizing financial and material support for the party.

The IL should be the original six
The Kinijit leaders in jail appointed only six individuals to the international leadership for a good reason. First, they wanted the leadership to be small enough to meet often and make decisions without delays. Second, the individuals selected were believed by the leaders to have political skills. Six more individuals were added under coercion and blackmail, not in consideration of what is best for the party. Many of the six new individuals who were added to the IL do not have any political skill. One of them, in fact, is politically extremely damaging to Kinijit. He is single-handedly responsible for the U.S. State Department’s negative views towards Kinijit, not to mention the numerous supporters who left the party because of his uncivil behavior. For the IL to be effective, it needs to be organized according to the jailed leaders’ design.

Protect Kinijit’s image
Kinijit, a party that advocates justice, peace, love, and tolerance is currently attracting some of the thuggish elements in our society. These self-proclaimed “Kinijit supporters” are similar in their character to Woyanne supporters–uncivil, intolerant, and ignorant. They claim to be Kinijit supporters, giving a false impression that most Kinijitians are like them. There is no doubt that some of them are Woyanne agent-provocateurs.

COMMENT

A further blow for a beleaguered leader

The Economist

ETHIOPIA’S prime minister, Meles Zenawi, now spends most of his time heading off his enemies. In the capital, Addis Ababa, the government’s response to its defeat in last year’s contested general election was to shoot scores of opposition protesters and imprison the city’s elected mayor. This led to the suspension of aid from his previously loyal Western backers.

To the south, in the Ogaden desert, he has been fighting with the Ogaden National Liberation Front (ONLF), a rebel group that seeks autonomy for south-eastern Ethiopia. On August 11th Ethiopia reported having shot dead 13 ONLF fighters slipping across the desert from Somalia. Ethiopia’s recent military incursion into Somalia in defence of the Transitional Government in Baidoa threatens imminent conflict there against Islamist militias based in the capital, Mogadishu.

On top of this comes the distinct possibility of a conflict with Ethiopia’s arch-enemy Eritrea in the north, where perhaps as many as half of Eritrea’s young men are massed under arms on its side of the disputed border.

Eritrea’s increasingly totalitarian regime has become a regional menace; its foreign policy now appears to comprise nothing more than to support any enemy of Ethiopia’s, no matter the cost. On August 8th Eritrea announced its biggest coup to date; a brigadier-general heading the 18th division of the Ethiopian army defected to Eritrea with several ranking officers, hundreds of soldiers, and plenty of weapons.

The general, Kemal Gelchu, was an ethnic Oromo. Probably as many as half of Ethiopians are Oromo, a good number of them Muslim. According to the government’s system of ethnic federalism, the Oromos are meant to have a large stake in power. In reality, they are weak and neglected, just as they have always been. A few support the Oromo Liberation Front (OLF)—another rebel group seeking a “fairer” Ethiopia, meaning a shift of power from Mr Zenawi and his fellow Tigrayans, who account for, at most, 7% of the population, but who have dominated the government and the economy since taking power in 1991.

Mr Gelchu’s defection puts a face to the deep unhappiness in the non-Tigrayan bits of Ethiopia. He and his men will now undoubtedly join the OLF and fight the Ethiopian government. Force is the only language the government understands, Mr Gelchu says. Alas, force may be exactly what Mr Zenawi is going to get, and on many fronts.

Announcement to Kinijit members, supporters and the general Public

Press Release
Kinijit International Leadership

Kinijit International Political Leadership Committee on behalf of the Kinijit leadership is actively pursuing the realization of the objectives of Kinijit and mobilizing the Ethiopian community for the struggle for freedom and democracy. The release of our leaders is the prime objective of our activity. Maximizing the utilization of various media outlets including those that are its own as an instrument for the struggle.

It is to be noted that several concerns have been raised with regard to the website (www.kinijit.org) which has been an official outlet of the party. Recently, the Kinijit International Political Leadership has been closely looking at the issues raised, including ownership, management and performance of the website. After carefully discussing the issues in three consecutive meetings and exhausting all the possible rectifications, it was found difficult to continue using Kinijit.org as the official website of Kinijit. The website has not been under the supervision of any authorized body of Kinijit. In such a situation, the leadership is left with no choice but announce its disclaimer to the public.

Therefore, we hereby announce that KINIJIT.ORG has ceased to be the official website of KINIJIT. An alternative website will be announced soon.
Kinijit as a party and Kinijit International Political Leadership as an authorized and mandated body to represent our leaders in prison are not responsible for any posting on the website. This is also to kindly request those people who do have access to the control of the website to refrain from portraying the site as the official website of Kinijit.

Any communication with respect to this issue can be made through the e-mail address:[email protected]

Kinijit International Political Leadership.
August 15, 2006

Interview with Lidetu Ayalew

Ethiopian Review conducted an interview with former Kinijit Vice President Lidetu Ayalew on Saturday, August 12. The interview, which is 2 hr and 38 min. long, covers Ato Lidetu’s political activities before the formation of the Coalition for Unity & Democracy (CUD/Kinijit), preparations for the May elections, disagreements within Kinijit before and after the elections, his decision to enter the parliament, current activities, and his future political outlook.

ER will withhold its comments on the interview until readers have the chance to listen and comment on it.

LISTEN HERE

COMMENT

Petition Letter to Shaleka Yoseph Yazew

Shaleka Yoseph Yazew
Chairman, Kinijit North America Support Committee
Washington DC

Dear Shaleka Yoseph:

We, concerned Kinijit chapter officers, chapter members and supporters, would like to lodge our serious concern and formal complaint on the purpose and intent of the Extraordinary General Assembly Meeting (EOGAM), called for August 19-20, 2006.

We will proceed into why we believe the initiative to call the meeting was illegal, undemocratic and conspiratorial. Further, we would venture to bring to your attention how the EOGAM, if allowed to proceed in its questionable form, will damage the credibility of the entire Kinijit operation and put serious dent on the struggle. We strongly and unequivocally believe that Kinijit and all related operations should be run in the spirit of the Kinijit Manifesto and in the format charted by our courageous leaders in Kaliti prison.

1.There is enough evidence to prove that the call for EOGAM is the brainchild of Ato
Moges Bruk, Chairperson of the Los Angeles Kinijit Support Chapter.

2.Ato Moges initiated the call for EOGAM and lobbied the support chapters without consulting and obtaining the approval of the LA Board of Directors. Therefore, the initial petition by Ato Moges and the subsequent measures taken by KNA office to call the EOGAM is illegal, dictatorial and devoid of normally accepted democratic practices.

3.Ato Moges never solicited with a clearly defined written petition and therefore was never able to justify the need for EOGAM, one that could not be delayed until the next GA meeting. The problems and challenges we face today are no different from the ones we faced during the May and July GA meetings.

4.That Ato Moges launched his vigilante campaign driven by his staunch opposition to the establishment of Kinijit International Leadership (KIL), which was sanctioned by our leaders in Kaliti prison, is an open secret. His recorded statement at the July GA meeting in Los Angeles and his email statement broadcast over the internet are sufficient proofs.

5.There is evidence to prove that Shaleka Yoseph assisted Ato Moges’s campaign to convene an EOGAM by lobbying chapters that are considered soft and vulnerable. An email communication from Dr. Gashu also reveals the level of coercion used to get chapters to support the meeting.

6.The KNA chapters are summoned to the August 19 Washington DC meeting without being provided a petition document which specifies the agenda and argues the emergency nature of the agenda items. Without such a document and without valid signatures of the parties supporting the petition, KNA should never have called the meeting. As a result, the meeting is null and void and the KNA officers who endorsed the costly meeting should be held accountable.

7.We do not know how many chapters subscribed to the EOGAM after being convinced of the need for such a meeting or how many were lured into supporting it. We do not also know how many chairpersons sought the approval of their respective boards before committing to the meeting. Even if the petition was done with good intent, it should be remembered that a call for EOGAM is not valid unless it is supported by a large majority of members, usually 66-75%.

8.That the call for EOGAM was made by Dr. Gashu, circumventing the secretariat and the Secretary General of KNA, proves the shoddy nature of the plot.

No, we are not EPRDF surrogates. No, we are not a group of anarchists bent on disrupting Kinijit. No, we are not power mongers. Indeed, we are individuals who like millions of other Ethiopians, are dedicated to the cause of democracy, justice and the rule of law. Even more importantly, we are committed to see to it that Kinijit support leadership functions observing democratic tenets, in full transparency and accountable to its constituency. This is the vision set by Kinijit the party and the example set by our leaders.

We earnestly hope we have presented a compelling case to let you appreciate the gross misconduct and consequently, the undesirable precedence which ensues if this EOGAM continues without serious and honest intervention. Here are our recommendations that hopefully mitigate the situation.

1. We request that the KNA Executive Committee make a formal apology realizing it has allowed itself to be manipulated by an individual who is sworn to “Kill KIL”.

2. We request that KNA officers who knowingly collaborated with Ato Moges be dismissed or receive stern disciplinary action.

3. We suggest the meeting be postponed even if participants sustain financial cost. They will still be in a position to salvage valuable time and some cost associated with hotels.

4. In the event the meeting cannot be cancelled or postponed, we suggest the GA use the time to streamline its operation after an open discussion on the many shortcomings of KNA which has virtually paralyzed operation and forced the community into a withdrawal syndrome from which it is difficult to extract.

5. We suggest that KNA establish a “Kaliti Commission” whose main purpose will be to focus attention on the plight and release of our elected leaders upon which Ethiopia hinged its hopes.

Sincerely,

Note: The signatories to this petition have agreed to email you this three-page document as an attachment to their individual notes, thus making it a legal and acceptable communication.

CC:
KNA Executive committee members
KNA Support Committee Chapter Board members (Individually)
Kinijit International Leadership