Skip to content

British money to prop up Ethiopia’s dictatorship

Posted on

Britain has decided to give upwards of $250 million a year to shore up the Zenawi regime under the guise of helping the Ethiopian people.  There is ample evidence that much of foreign aid to the Zenawi regime is used to brutalize and keep Ethiopians poor.

Human Rights Watch has put it bluntly to donors who pretend to help the poor in Ethiopia.  “Ethiopia’s repressive government has put foreign aid to a sinister purpose, with officials in Ethiopia’s ruling party using their power to give or deny financial assistance to citizens based on their political affiliation. Perhaps even more shocking, international donors appear to expend more energy pretending these abuses don’t exist than trying to address them.”

After thirty years of famine assistance, Ethiopia still can’t feed its people.  So-called aid is used to enrich a tyrant and his coterie who make Ghaddafi look like a boy scout.  Yet donors continue to turn a blind  eye to the suffering of the average Ethiopian as long as the regime in power continues their bidding.  Is it too much to ask “Donor Do No Harm”?

Ethiopia is Top UK Aid Recipient

Peter Heinlein | Voice of America |

Britain has chosen Ethiopia to be its biggest recipient of development aid during the next four years. Several donor governments are ramping up assistance as Ethiopia sets ambitious goals for eradicating poverty and hunger.

Ethiopia will receive $2 billion in British development assistance in a four-year period.

Howard Taylor, head of the British aid program in Ethiopia, says the decision to boost assistance was based on need as well as evidence that the country has made major strides in recent years.

Ethiopia Prime Minister Meles Zenawi says his country’s economy has grown at a rate of 10 percent or more during each of the past seven years.  International aid agencies question the method of calculating the figure.  But Mr. Meles says that even double-digit growth would not be enough because Ethiopia’s population has increased faster than the country’s rate of economic growth.  The population now stands at around 80 million people.

Taylor says that although the accuracy of the government data can be debated, there is no doubt that Ethiopia’s economic growth is accelerating. “The precision of the data is disputed, and we have an ongoing conversation ourselves with partners, including the government itself, about some of that data.  But the headline issue, which nobody disputes, is that there has been from a low base tremendous development progress in Ethiopia over the last eight to ten years or so,” he said.

Taylor says recent studies show that Ethiopia receives far less aid than it needs – half as much in assistance per capita compared to other African countries.  He attributes that partly to donor concerns about the killing of anti-government demonstrators following Ethiopia’s disputed 2005 election.

“It’s a fact that overseas aid to Ethiopia did decrease after the 2005 election.  It has since increased.  I think the size of the population in Ethiopia is a key factor in why the per capita aid is low because Ethiopia is so populous and still growing so fast,” he said.

A poverty index released by Oxford University and the United Nations last year ranked Ethiopia as the world’s second poorest country, after Niger.  But the Ethiopian government’s latest five year economic plan includes the ambitious goal of achieving self-sufficiency in food.

Taylor says international donors are increasing their aid budgets, even as they struggle with their own economic troubles. “They’re certainly in the poorest 10 countries in the world.  But I think that’s an obvious argument for continued support and increasing what we do here.  We are trying to help the millions of very poor, very vulnerable Ethiopians improve their lives,” he said.

Britain and the European Union are among Ethiopia’s biggest aid donors.

The United States is the largest bilateral aid contributor to Ethiopia, averaging more than $1 billion in assistance per year since 2007.  During that time, U.S. aid has included more than $1.5 billion in food aid to prevent famine and alleviate chronic food shortages.

3 thoughts on “British money to prop up Ethiopia’s dictatorship

  1. Ethiopia can not feed its people because the popuation grows fast. but Ethiopia will be able to feed its because within 5 years the population growth will be stopped. In addition Derg and extrimists are to blame for the problem. Weyanes corruption and inefficiency is not the reason.

  2. Development with out freedom

    To tell you are simply dedebit chimp one does not need sky rocketing
    knowledge ,you come with a rubber shoes now you start wearing leder
    and for you and your likes it is development your allegation of derg
    sympathiser is completely true because the whole Ethiopian people except the illitrates and primitive woyannes is by far better even no comparison woyanne is enemy derg is Ethiopian that makes a failure by
    killing Ethiopian youths that the enemy already killed two generations

  3. Deposed dictators now are subject to lawsuits (CNN Transcript)

    ….His son, Saif, says the only options are to live and die in Libya. They may not have many other options. Analysts say there was a day when dictators on the ropes, like Moammar Gadhafi could bail out with their millions to places like the French Riviera, or Switzerland’s Lake Geneva. No more. SCOTT HORTON, INT’L. COMMERCIAL ATTORNEY: Deposed dictators now are subject to lawsuits. Both civil suits by the governments that succeed them, and human rights suits, and they wind up being prosecuted and successfully sued. Scott Horton is an international lawyer who’s helping two countries retrieve money from their former leaders. He says the investigation by the International Criminal Court of Gadhafi for crimes against humanity will scare off some potential hosts if Gadhafi leaves Libya. Saudi Arabia is a refuge of choice for ex-dictators, especially those how are Muslim. And Horton says the Saudis don’t feel beholden to that court. Zine El Abidine Ben Ali fled there from Tunisia. Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak may wind up there, but Saudi Arabia is not an option for Moammar Gadhafi. HORTON: He was shown in a criminal investigation to have had close ties to an effort to assassinate then crown prince now King Abdullah. And the decision to extend asylum is going to be Abdullah’s. It’s hard to imagine him welcoming Moammar Gadhafi. TODD (Reporter): One leader who might, Robert Mugabe, the equally brutal and uneven dictator of Zimbabwe. Mugabe and Gadhafi are close allies. Analysts say Gadhafi has poured millions of dollars into Zimbabwe’s coffers over the years. Gadhafi has some money he can bring with him to Zimbabwe, but experts say with much of it now frozen Gadhafi is not as attractive a guest even to Mugabe. So for as staying entrenched in Libya – TODD: Even Gadhafi’s old Latin American confidantes, Hugo Chavez of Venezuela and Daniel Ortega of Nicaragua may be getting cold feet. Scott Horton says during this Libyan uprising, their opponents, within their own countries, are getting more vocal against Chavez and Ortega for supporting Gadhafi. And they may feel it’s not worth it to take him in at this point, Wolf. As noble as it is to freeze their assets and try to isolate them analysts say some dictators when they are faced with the prospect of all this, will say, to heck with it. I’m not going to get outside of my country. I’m going to stay here and fight it out to hold on to what I have, and that may make some of these revolutions even more bloody.

Leave a Reply