The biggest obstacle to the advancement of technology in Ethiopia is Meles Zenawi and his vampire regime. For example, even Somalia, which doesn’t have a functioning government, has a much better mobile phone service than Ethiopia. The Woyanne regime has made it illegal to own and operate an Internet service. The private sector is blocked from entering the telecommunication industry. Every major industry in Ethiopia is dominated by Woyanne-owned mega corporations (vampires) that are sucking Ethiopia’s life blood, with the collaboration of the World Bank, IMF and other poverty-monger international institutions.
———————————
Developing States Must Foster Technology – Meles
The Daily Monitor (Addis Ababa)
Prime Minister Dictator Meles Zenawi has emphasized the need for governments in Africa and in other developing regions to create and develop market systems backed by appropriate technology.
In his lecture presented as part of the “African Economic and Business Summit”, Meles said low-level of technological development has been one of the major factors hampering the economies of African countries. [Meles the warlord himself is ‘hampering’ the Ethiopian and the Horn of Africa economy].
The Premier thief said the technology markets exist and operate if only governments actively and effectively intervene in such processes.
“There is no development without technological development. There cannot be a free and competitive market in the technology market because every product is unique,” Meles told the audience. (It must be a punishment for the audience to have to listen to this guy).
In the absence of such intervention, he said, there can be no technological development and hence “non-development”. (Woyanne intervention is preventing technological development in Ethiopia).
“This is the case everywhere and indeed developing countries suffer even deeper problems in technology market because of low-level of accumulative knowledge,” Meles (who expelled over 40 Addis Ababa University professors) explained.
The Prime Minister Woyanne warlord described such a situation as a “vicious circle” developing countries are caught in to date.
His paper gave an in-depth analysis of the ramifications of technological advancement or the lack of it on overall economic development of countries and their capabilities to harness global markets.
“Developing countries accumulate technological capabilities primarily through adoption and adaptation of technologies already discovered by developed countries,” he underscored.
As one of the setbacks of such processes of adoption and adaptation, he cited the costs of time and money spent on research as those who want to embark on it “will have to carry out extensive search for the best awareness and the best suppliers of the technologies”.
“Once the technology has been bought, the company and its personnel will have to learn to use it properly through learning by doing.” “This is an extensive process (of) making mistakes and learning from them,” he said.
Those who adopt or adapt any such technology, he said, will have no patent right over it. “Sooner or later, others will acquire the same technology without going through the same process by simply poaching employees of the pioneer company.” “From the point of view of the pioneer company, however, it forces the cost of introducing the technology and competes with those who copy from it without carrying the cost in time and money.” Because of “the unique nature of market failure they face”, developing countries have been intervening in technological markets even more than developed ones, Meles (the vote thief) observed.