There is one underlying relationship issue that the elite faced for over half a century: to be or not to be part of Ethiopia. Leading a struggle under one Ethiopia and becoming the power holder, the elite thought, was good because Ethiopia offered vast resources and much much bigger market that would translate into much bigger power for that elite.
On the down side, the elite thought, it risked losing power soon after it comes to power because it then had to face the elites coming from a much larger elite pool than the much smaller elite pool of Eritrea. They probably strongly felt that once they did the hard work and sacrifice in removing the central government, they would have to choose between sharing substantial power with the much larger elite base of Ethiopia or face heading a nation very ungovernable.
So they finally decided to forget the resources, the market, the history and the cultural relationship with Ethiopia that would have brought them more power because they were cowards who felt threatened by the future possibility of having to contest against the elite of the bigger Ethiopia.
What the elite never forsaw is that opting out of Ethiopia, just like opting in, has its risks, too. For all practical purposes, the elite is fully engaged in Ethiopian internal politics but without the legitmacy! If the elite of the highland Eritrea had decided to stay in the union, they would have had a legitmate right to involve and change the Ethiopia state they so dislike today.
The elite has to face this dilema again and again in the future and, hopefully, learn from its mistake. The mistake arises in the first place because there is a desire to rule others. Understanding that mistake will take the elite forward. The motivating principle should be development and justice for all. If that is your principle you have nothing to lose and the elite can easily get around the dilema that is paralayzing them for long.
Edu, not so renowned blogger



